kvetching

11 ms·

91.
by kvetching 3y ago
They could have it open source and people like Gerganov could rewrite the code in C/C++, but god forbid they actual are open
92.
by kvetching 3y ago
I think Ilya leading the tech is plenty morale boosting
93.
by kvetching 3y ago
Right. All the evidence points to more potential being left on the table for emergent abilities. It would make no sense that the model would develop all of these complex skills for better predicting the next token, then just stop. It's
94.
by kvetching 4y ago
LLMs wont achieve superintelligence alone. He's jumped the gun and has now put on a clown wig.
95.
by kvetching 4y ago
I believe AGI using LLMs will need a cognitive framework to glue these models into. I don't think we're anywhere near having one model that reaches AGI with it's own agency and online learning.
96.
by kvetching 4y ago
Slaughterbot mini kamikaze drones were hypothesized 5 years ago - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fa9lVwHHqg AI & drone tech is fast enough that it would be trivial to build these now
97.
by kvetching 4y ago
The thing is, there's no evidence that the current path will lead to superintelligence. It could be the case that despite feeding a trillion dollars in compute / data to a model, that we still need to hold it's hand to do any
98.
by kvetching 4y ago
This is the real threat of these large AI models. They will revolutionize the ability to find vulnerabilities. Especially if we achieve AGI.
99.
by kvetching 4y ago
The world is in more danger if we give China the opportunity to create a communist AGI first
100.
by kvetching 4y ago
China won't stop their progress. If they achieve AGI first, consider us over. A communist AGI will be used as a cyberweapon. The world order is fucked right now. Verge of WWIII. Russia suspended nuclear treaty. China and Iran are helpi
101.
by kvetching 4y ago
If China achieves AGI first, we are done. The first thing they'll do is create cyber-weapons. Their AGI could find vulnerabilities in our systems and brick all of our devices. It's a far greater near term existential risk for us t
102.
by kvetching 4y ago
exactly. Specifically China. They've said for years, they want to be the global AI leader. They have more data than anyone. Now that they know LLMs work as good as they do, they are going all in. They achieve AGI first, that's bad
103.
by kvetching 4y ago
The question is, who's going to stop us from using it for commercial grounds. Most companies that would use these models would be startups and are years away from any sort of potential audit that may occur.
104.
by kvetching 4y ago
Read the Microsoft Research paper on GPT-4. Some extremely intelligent behavior emerged from just text that has nothing to do with the text it was trained on.
105.
by kvetching 4y ago
It's really messed up. It has so much potential. It could answer literally any question you would pose it before they neuter it. What's wrong with letting the user determine if it's a good answer or not? Let people see what t
106.
by kvetching 4y ago
My god. This is pure marxist bias of deconstructionism.
107.
by kvetching 4y ago
Obviously we can't "know" this. My thinking is largely influenced by consciousness researcher and founder of Qualia Research Institute, Andrés Gómez Emilsson. Here's a couple recent videos with him about why digital com
108.
by kvetching 4y ago
I'm sure they do. It's just not coherent, hence prefacing my comment with bound. It's just random mind dust. I am a believer of a form of panpsychism. And that the hard problem of consciousness is better formulated as the bou
109.
by kvetching 4y ago
Dang, dang, you are one hell of a mod. I can't believe you are giving me a 3rd chance. I will try my best. As my username suggests, this was a joke account, but I have come to appreciate this place. You're tolerance has given me p
110.
by kvetching 4y ago
Silicon chips will never be able to generate a bound qualia space as we have. Currently, you could prompt GPT to act as if it is sentient and has qualia, and it will do quite a good job at trying to convince you it's not a P-Zombie.
111.
by kvetching 4y ago
Even on ChatGPT Plus, it is using an old model text-davinci-002 as it says in the URL. The answers don't match what they should be for GPT-4 either. False advertising. They got my money already unfortunately as I was hoping to Try it,
112.
by kvetching 4y ago
It says you can use GPT-4 with ChatGPT-Plus. But when will https://chat.openai.com/ Plus officially be running GPT-4? Why did they would release this article and state it was available without actually updating the site. I&
113.
by kvetching 4y ago
Just because he's a Gentile doesn't mean he's bad at banking. It's really inappropriate to bring anti-semitic terminology into the discussion.
114.
by kvetching 4y ago
So essentially what you're saying is people should open a new account for every $250k they have, so their money is insured. Insane that this is something that people now need to worry about.
115.
by kvetching 4y ago
It's okay to be prejudiced.
116.
by kvetching 4y ago
Same story with many brands. Rather than raise their prices, they cut quality. Do companies not understand why people were buying them to begin with? Bounty paper towels are the latest brand that I noticed. They always were superior, thic
117.
by kvetching 4y ago
ChatGPT is a masterpiece. To code something from scratch that can do everything it does at the proficiency it does is impossible. Insane how quickly people take something for granted.
118.
by kvetching 4y ago
So frustrating to see people complain that it provides wrong information. With this logic it can never know anything. It is not made for querying. It's made to complete the text you provide it, with some minor modifications to help it
119.
by kvetching 4y ago
One idea is that it could be full of quartz, something required for the Giza Power Plant hypothesis.
120.
by kvetching 4y ago
But a strong solar flare might.

More ›