kukx

12 ms·

61.
by kukx 5y ago
> there appears to be few if any incentives for FSD to improve beyond... I think it is simply not true. Creating a FSD that could replace human drivers eg in case of trucks is potentially highly lucrative and it would make the economy mo
62.
by kukx 5y ago
> without trying to kill people Do you suggest that Tesla is trying to kill people? That would be a ridiculous statement. I bet the risk of getting injured by Tesla beta version of FSD is miniscule compared to a risk of getting into acci
63.
by kukx 5y ago
Why do you discard the possibility that Tesla will save lives in the long term? You may say it is unlikely, but it is not like Musk did not deliver world scale breakthroughs. Also, regarding the medicine, do you really believe we do not do
64.
by kukx 5y ago
It is faster this way. And anyway it would be impossible to simulate the real world scenarios in the synthetic environment. One of the potential benefits of FSD is that it will save lives, hence should we go slow about it or take a reasonab
65.
by kukx 5y ago
It can be useful of you want to use a non standard way to paste stuff, example a right mouse button in putty.
66.
by kukx 5y ago
Also the exceptions exist usually for a good reason. Trying to get rid of them without understanding it is a bad idea.
67.
by kukx 5y ago
The conclusion is derived from the basic principles. Of course if even more money was given directly to non productive people the prices would increase even faster!
68.
by kukx 5y ago
Of course. Printing money inflates its supply. And increasing the demand for products (by providing easy money) without increasing the supply of products (and actually decreasing it by restricting work) will lead to higher prices. It is eco
69.
by kukx 5y ago
And their income will grow on trees. It will fail unless the government gets easy money from eg producing oil like Emirates. Otherwise someone needs to produce stuff. We already have a big inflation problem that is directly related to polic
70.
by kukx 5y ago
Let's cover parkings with PV roofs then we can make use of this energy.
71.
by kukx 5y ago
The strict sql_mode is often manually disabled. I bet it is off on most shared hostings.
72.
by kukx 5y ago
Why should everyone be paid a lot? Is everyone's labor really worth the same? Should not people be paid according to the value of their input? I am super fine with people charging me little for their services as long as they deem that
73.
Old BlackBerry phones will stop working from January 4(techradar.com)
2 points by kukx 5y ago|0 comments
74.
by kukx 5y ago
In case of crypto you can easily go to 0 or near 0. However gold is historically stable in terms of a real value.
75.
by kukx 5y ago
By the same logic we can justify any [social issue] division. The sad thing is that the rules are arbitrary and do not help in solving the issue. Actually it is in the interest of the division to create or exaggerate problems to justify its
76.
by kukx 5y ago
If anyone is in doubt that's the purpose of this endeavor here's a related fragment: "- Realizing the declaration of the world’s resources as being the common heritage of all people. - Replacing money-based nationalistic econ
77.
by kukx 5y ago
It is a gamble. The interests can go up and then you could be cooked. And anyway you need to find a way to get ahead of the inflation with this money. Sure it is an opportunity but not without risks.
78.
by kukx 5y ago
I wonder how long they will stay a "Gold Microsoft Partner" after this.
79.
by kukx 5y ago
I did not say that taxes are evil per se, but bad taxes are bad. "This undermines the free market (...)" - yes taxes obviously affect the free market. They are often meant to skew (regulate) it, like tax that targets unhealthy pro
80.
by kukx 5y ago
Your last argument could be reduced to "if evil happens to me, why not make it happen to others". If taxing investment is bad let's agree not to do it, instead of perpetuating the abuse. And no, definitely not all money is pr
81.
by kukx 5y ago
I was referring to the WFH aspect the parent post mentioned. My point was that the admins could get the same level of access as if they were physically on site, assuming the correct setup.
82.
by kukx 5y ago
It is a matter of preparation. You can make sure there are KVMoIPs or other OOB technologies available on site to allow direct access from a remote location. In the worst case technician has to know how to connect the OOB device or press a
83.
by kukx 5y ago
I do not think it is about the form. I believe it is about whether we can make others sacrifice for the common good. And this discussion involves us all.
84.
by kukx 5y ago
Or a child of such woman? Or... The society as a whole has an interest in keeping itself healthy. We should look for the solution together.
85.
by kukx 5y ago
I do not know what the author means by productivity. On the surface there is a structure in the thought achieved by versioning the term, but beyond that there is just the chaos of ideas. And I am not sold on redefining the words, please inv
86.
by kukx 5y ago
Canada could ban Huawei domestically, maybe. But a wider ban that would really hurt Huawei can only be pulled off by some later entity eg US, EU.
87.
by kukx 5y ago
For the love of God, we do not want a government to be in charge of the innovation. When government declares specifically what technology is mandated then we can be quite certain that there will be no more progress in this area. For example
88.
by kukx 5y ago
Be careful with conspiracy theories. Some people get banned for them. While they are sometimes true (eg Watergate), usually they are not.
89.
by kukx 5y ago
Weapons are also tools for peace, an atomic bomb helped a lot in that regard.
90.
by kukx 5y ago
I know that there are built in workarounds ie default aliases and the case can be omitted. But it creates another set of problems related to documentation and code samples/conventions. The objects passing is great, but it is not enough

More ›