kubb

6 ms·

151.
by kubb 5mo ago
Thanks for the PFAS old codgers.
152.
by kubb 5mo ago
It feels like you’re upset because your favorite language has objective flaws that people are pointing out. You’re also trying to minimize people’s lived experiences and pleading with them to stop pointing the flaws out. Sure, Go is better
153.
by kubb 5mo ago
Apparently a single person can live in Busan on 1500 USD per month. 200k buys you 11 years, not accounting for inflation and COL increase. A 40 year old person can’t retire on that money.
154.
by kubb 5mo ago
That’s trivially true always and everywhere haha
155.
by kubb 5mo ago
You can retire in Korea on 200K after tax?
156.
by kubb 5mo ago
Should be usable with ssh port forwarding?
157.
by kubb 5mo ago
Utterances that come out of executive’s mouths don’t have truth values. They’re sounds meant to irritate people’s nervous systems to achieve the exec’s goals.
158.
by kubb 5mo ago
Now let’s see Paul Allen’s AI adoption strategy.
159.
by kubb 5mo ago
Well, how much is it? Nuclear costs are front loaded.
160.
by kubb 5mo ago
Sorry, there are many better things to read than Scott's thoughts.
161.
by kubb 5mo ago
The first and the last. Doesn't come as a surprise that they're regularly added to HN, often multiple times and rarely ever get more than 5 upvotes.
162.
by kubb 5mo ago
They'll just need to update the prompt with "make sure there's no UB", and it should be good.
163.
by kubb 5mo ago
Gosh it's quite embarassing to have to spell it out, but you inserted the part about Scott's motivations. It can't be found in the text. Neither can any specific discussion of what the dangers are and how we can steer clear.
164.
by kubb 5mo ago
Indeed, why warn people about real things that exist in the world? That is EXACTLY the same as inciting fear about something imaginary (not even projected).
165.
by kubb 5mo ago
Sounds like the burden is on you to explain either 1. If you're not treating my claim as a black box, explain explicitly what is your model of what the article was about? Are you aware, for example of the last paragraph of the arti
166.
by kubb 5mo ago
If the scary AI is so inevitable, why do you feel such an overwhelming need to convince people about that? Surely you can just wait a bit, and they'll see for themselves.
167.
by kubb 5mo ago
So, the same thing we've all been doing already with Termius and Tailscale, just locked into ChatGPT?
168.
by kubb 5mo ago
Folks! This is a quip from a novelist! Take it with a grain of salt. It has to be punchy, not accurate.
169.
by kubb 5mo ago
I know that most people aren’t into nvim, but I really love obsidian.nvim for this. Beautiful searching and editing experience and all the KM features that I need, all on plain Markdown. I’ve been extremely happy since I set it up.
170.
by kubb 5mo ago
When it works.
171.
by kubb 5mo ago
This is some kind of a meme where people believe things can’t be defined in legal terms and therefore can’t be regulated. These people are usually not lawyers. Does anyone know where it’s coming from? I can certainly believe that incompeten
172.
by kubb 5mo ago
"People deliberately misuse the very mechanism that was designed to indicate successful completion, so we added another, flawed detection mechanism based on IO, because there's no way they'll do the thing that they should hav
173.
by kubb 5mo ago
Let's wait 10 years and see.
174.
by kubb 5mo ago
You will need 100s of billions to make a viable POC.
175.
by kubb 5mo ago
Now check how much OpenAI got in their last funding round, and you have your answer.
176.
by kubb 5mo ago
The money will go to LLMs.
177.
by kubb 5mo ago
Not in the next decade. Won't get funded.
178.
by kubb 5mo ago
s/competitor/intelligence services/
179.
by kubb 5mo ago
Whenever someone complains about not being able to use a slightly different syntax, I assume they just don't have any neuroplasticity anymore.
180.
by kubb 5mo ago
Altman must be much more strategic and calculated in his communication than Trump who just kind of blurts out whatever.

More ›