Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kubb
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
28 ms
·
601.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
But you understand why one of these things is legal and the other is not? Because the employer has power and the employee doesn’t. Of course they should, but they have much more influence on the law so they don’t.
602.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
> nothing has to make sense It does make sense. The companies are expected to exponentially improve LLMs, and the increasing versions are catering to the enthusiast crowd who just need a number to go up to lose their mind over how all jo
603.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
> to justify the full version increment I feel like a company doesn’t have to justify a version increment. They should justify price increases. If you get hyped and have expectations for a number then I’m comfortable saying that’s on you
604.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
It's all you need after all.
605.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
I’m still waiting for the first compelling piece of computer generated literature or cinema. I’d say art but for many, generated pictures are amazing so I’ll accept that. But creating compelling narratives seems impossible right now. I wond
606.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
Aren't Zed and Nova and vim meant to be general-purpose editors too?
607.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
What happens when you return from a proc when the enclosing function has already returned?
608.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
I think you get the point that I’m making though. You could substitute vaccines by plate tectonics or evolution by natural selection or that smoking causes cancer.
609.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
> Sure, but it does undermine it. Not really. Take something like vaccines. There’s a ton of verified evidence that they work, and the view that they cause harm is not well supported at all. The fact that someone published papers about i
610.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
Respectfully, the replication crisis in science doesn’t invalidate scientific consensus. The stuff that actually is thoroughly checked and widely accepted still stands, and is a much stronger foundation because it has been challenged and ve
611.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
The claim that conservatism is rooted in an inability to process reality is a misrepresentation. The actual cornerstone of conservatism is an instinctual preference for stability, order, and the familiar. The danger arises when this instinc
612.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
It's brilliant, we don't actually need to go full communism, we just need to threaten it, and things will improve for the average person!
613.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
If you believe that building more housing is a solution to the housing crisis, then building large blocks of flats from prefabricates should seem like an attractive option. You can build cheaply and efficiently because of economy of scale,
614.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
I agree that fast iteration and the „easy to get something working” factor is a huge asset in Python, which contributed to its growth. A whole lot of things were done right from that point of view. An additional asset was the friendliness o
615.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
2 to 3 was possibly precisely because of user lock-in and sunk cost. This kind of global update was unprecedented, and could have been totally avoided with better design.
616.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
Ever been an expert who had to work on a codebase created by a novice? They invent the weirdest things. I know I used to do that too 10 years ago.
617.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
Sounds like a fun job, I’d love to do something like this in my 9 to 5. It’s also amazing how much work goes into making Python a decent platform because it’s popular. Work that will never be finished and could have been avoided with better
618.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
I assure you forcing everyone into one of two options results in way more division. You can probably imagine why.
619.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
Also practice, programming is hard, but just because one person doesn't understand something, doesn't mean it's impossible or a bad idea.
620.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
It’s brilliant because you can always shift the blame on the user. Wrong prompt, wrong model, should have used an agent and ran 3 models in parallel, etc. Meanwhile we get claims that the tools are as capable as a junior programmer, and CEO
621.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
Worth remembering how much marketing effort and money there was in pushing Java in the 90s: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NVuTBL09Dn4
622.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
I wonder if we get automatic LLM translation of codebases from language to language soon - this could close the library gap and diminish the language lock in factor.
623.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
When someone tells you they know how the future plays out because they saw it in fiction, oh boy you better be skeptical.
624.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
Science fiction pattern matching is a problem nobody talks about. People see something that vaguely resembles a movie that they saw and act like that movie is reality now.
625.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
I’d wager 90% time spent at Google is fighting incidental organizational complexity, which is virtually unlimited.
626.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
It’s because the art for these games was so good, it didn’t feel like the hardware was a limitation, more like it just had a particular style. I’m currently playing Octopath Traveler 2 and it completely recreates this feeling, the art is be
627.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
You mean horizontal, at the bottom of the door. That one can be justified by ease of cleaning. I mean vertical at the side of the door. You can literally make eye contact with the occupant as you walk by.
628.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
There’s a lot of excuses but in the end America can’t live in the future because of its culture. People will say stupid stuff like "oh it’s because we pay for their defense", or "oh it’s because we have freedom", or &quo
629.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
You'll become a servant for the people who have some wealth, and they'll feel thrilled to be able to order you around.
630.
▲
by
kubb
1y ago
One more to the list: We persuade reports to tackle tasks that they know are useless but will need to get done to appease some moron with power.
More ›