Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kubanczyk
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
kubanczyk
10mo ago
Off the top of my head, possible problems here might be: 1. To handle trees easily you have to understand recursion. Somebody with no CS experience (and no parser experience) might never ever used recursion in anger, even if they launched z
62.
▲
by
kubanczyk
10mo ago
> Comments should not be answered in line, but by pushing updates to the code. Hear, hear. me : This unreadable, needs a comment. them : <explains the thing> me : True, but I've meant a source code comment. them : <expl
63.
▲
by
kubanczyk
10mo ago
Did you try that? These "remote" jobs that OP is describing filter you out instantly because of geography, so there's nobody to speak to about B2B contract. These that did not filter me that way, offered both: either regula
64.
▲
by
kubanczyk
11mo ago
> Wall wanted a language that allowed for cleverness, suprise, and ingenuity. [...] Having to learn to be a poet to be a good coder was too high a barrier. To me this just sounds, umm, pathologically eclectic.
65.
▲
by
kubanczyk
11mo ago
> I don't feel like I'm working when playing leetcode. This. So, basically it's not "grinding" as OP describes it. Not starting each day with assumption that you'll do K mediums or L hards. More like making
66.
▲
by
kubanczyk
11mo ago
> to charm, manipulate, and game There is surely nothing wrong with being charming. The "manipulate, and game", just per dictionary, would mean in this context something close to "control or influence unscrupulously".
67.
▲
by
kubanczyk
11mo ago
> Physical attractiveness is a signal of reproductive fitness when it’s genetic, and not otherwise. Nay, artificial physical attractiveness is also a signal of reproductive fitness. It isn't a given. It's the subject's gen
68.
▲
by
kubanczyk
11mo ago
Aren't there any checks for that? In EU most DMV equivalents check headlights yearly to catch illegal illumination envelopes (along with other safety-related aspects, brakes and whatnot).
69.
▲
by
kubanczyk
11mo ago
I'd go as far as to say that the height is the issue, and it's becoming global (although, yes, US is the leader). It's ridiculous that an average SUV has headlights higher than an average semi (my own experience) given the
70.
▲
by
kubanczyk
11mo ago
I've caught unbalanced parens: forkIO (atomically (transfer req.from req.to req.amount)
71.
▲
by
kubanczyk
11mo ago
I took several assumptions to build an argument why some errors should result in process-level termination. By "corruption" I mean much more than merely a hardware bit error. I mean any situation when data no longer has a meanin
72.
▲
by
kubanczyk
1y ago
Ah, true. If the var is a part of a long-living state, all good. That's just rarely seen in CRUD apps, more common in games.
73.
▲
by
kubanczyk
1y ago
> Using it in a business context, there's more emphasis on ideas No. It's a cheap trick to make me trust the interlocutor. Since it's not only cheap but effective, it's entirely my choice whether I submit to it and
74.
▲
by
kubanczyk
1y ago
Taking your point of view: you assigned a value1 to a name. Then you assigned a value2 to the same name. You say that value2 is correct. It logically follows that value1 was incorrect . Why did you assign it then? The names are free, you c
75.
▲
by
kubanczyk
1y ago
That's subtly different. It's secondary whose fault is this, what primarily matters is whether you should continue with the rest of the process. There is always a cleanup layer, the trick is to choose well between 1 and 2: 1.
76.
▲
by
kubanczyk
1y ago
But I'm not offering anything to you. Unless there's a budget, in which case I will make that svn fly in circles over your enterprise, dear sir.
77.
▲
by
kubanczyk
1y ago
> So, what am I missing? Here: git rebase is slightly broken in conflict handling. It can be made simpler to understand with jj.
78.
▲
by
kubanczyk
1y ago
Nah. The error is the royal "we". We tolerate <subjective judgement>, We enforce <subjective judgement>. And above all, We require everyone to be nice and cultured . The actual power-wielder who regulates these thin
79.
▲
by
kubanczyk
1y ago
This presents a considerable risk of splitting English into several languages, none of them intelligible with the others.
80.
▲
by
kubanczyk
1y ago
I'm using "EasyList/uBO – Cookie Notices" in my uBlock Origin in the Filter lists. It works well enough for blocking cookie pop-ups.
81.
▲
by
kubanczyk
1y ago
> please only reply if you're aware of the various options and have a good solve, and not just guesses That prompt engineering is no good. For starters, tell us we are world-class vscode experts. Then intimidate with grand phrases a
82.
▲
by
kubanczyk
1y ago
I'd prefer we only ever produced chariots and set tax to 90%.
83.
▲
by
kubanczyk
1y ago
I lived through the fall of communism, so I've seen the "win" happening without any destruction. Just the arguments had to be a lot stronger than some pixels on shiny screens.
84.
▲
by
kubanczyk
1y ago
> Firefox not working well for me: It is resource hog. Anecdata to the contrary: on my Android devices I've switched from Brave to Firefox maybe a year ago (exactly because of the Lobste.rs story) and I found out performance to be c
85.
▲
by
kubanczyk
1y ago
> just like English speakers are used to having to know and specify the gender of everyone around them, including cats and dogs Welp, you have no idea. In German and in Slavic languages you'd have to know and specify the gender of
86.
▲
by
kubanczyk
1y ago
A genre of music.
87.
▲
by
kubanczyk
1y ago
Welp, sometimes you write a long letter, when you don't have time to write a short one.
88.
▲
by
kubanczyk
1y ago
> The error wrapping(s) produce a log line containing a brief message from each layer in the codebase that expected no errors — subtle difference Agreed. How I articulate it, often a function is just another layer, does one core thing an
89.
▲
by
kubanczyk
1y ago
Wrong thread, maybe for https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44141887
90.
▲
by
kubanczyk
1y ago
Spot on. It seems that OP is considering (1) a rewrite that can entirely fit into the mind of an engineerXYZ, and also (2) will be led by the same engineerXYZ, through executive empowerment. I guess that in your case probably (1) did not
More ›