Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ktta
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
141 ms
·
661.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
@dang: Are influenced submissions investigated? This post was submitted by an account with no other submissions/comments except this. I suspect some mischief, but have no proof. Is is possible to look at the first few votes made for th
662.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
Many people came to the same conclusion during the WannaCry malware attack. I'd suggest taking a look at those threads fpr related discussion.
663.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
Even if salts are unique to a single user, there's still a possibility where someone determined can get the password. That's because the user specific salts were probably in the same db. This will make it difficult since a brute f
664.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
Do you by chance have hard numbers about SHA2 with/without hardware instructions and BLAKE2 on a specific Intel CPU? I've wondered about trade off between SHA256 vs BLAKE2. In the future there'll be no debate since more and m
665.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
Yep. That's the one. I just wanted to say that this tech isn't groundbreaking, especially since adobe came up with that so long ago.
666.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
I remember adobe showcasing this with photoshop. I can't find the video right now, but it was basically about Photoshop automatically filling in almost half a screen of material. I'm looking for a video on youtube specifically.
667.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
Found some links to ampproject.org in the source, looking at the website, I think we've found the answer. Surprisingly I don't think that website is affiliated with Google. I could find only a single reference, except on this page
668.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
Tunnels might look more futuristic, but I can't imagine a world where building layers of tunnels will be cheaper than larger roads. We've already put the R&D into roads, and the cars that run on them. Routing problems have als
669.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
It is very easy to come up with theoretical numbers and look nice. We already know know the subway infrastructure works. Forget what exists currently, and try to calculate the theoretical throughput of the subway system. I bet you'll c
670.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
What's going on with the website? Does any know what the 'amp' in the URL stand for? Is it the same as Google's AMP project? Here's the non-AMP version: https://www.engadget.com/2017/05/17&
671.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
The last mile problem isn't about difficulty to drive, it is about congestion. Tunnels, however long they maybe to take advantage of the speed, must end. At the endpoint is where the problems start with trying to accommodate capacity e
672.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
(If you're taking about inter-city travel) I really doubt one person on a lane can be faster than a freeway with 4+ lanes (in one direction) no matter how fast it is going. Another thing you'll have to consider is that there will
673.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
See I don't know what specifics they're talking about when they say 'a large network'. It'll obviously be more efficient to dig a wider tunnel than multiple tunnel on a single route. So, unless I'm wrong, to me
674.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
Uhh, this isn't going to be the panacea many are making it out to be here. This will not come close to accommodating the current capacity of freeways. The tunnel is being planned to be 14 feet wide, which is how it suddenly becomes via
675.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
Maybe SHA instructions like Intel?
676.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
That's changing, because 4.9 kernel is being worked on. Although it is currently buggy, that won't be the case for long.
677.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
Are you the owner of the spreadsheet? If so it is missing many x86 options like Udoo, JaguarBoard, UP board and others.
678.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
I've used rclone[1] with great success (it can sync specific folders which looks like what you want) but I've since then moved on to a commercial service called Insync[2] because I was having rate limiting problems with the Google
679.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
Flying cars are what comes next after cars, and that's been going on for several decades now isn't it? VR does have great potential, but not as it is right now. IBM and Xerox have put in a lot of money then in a lot of things. And
680.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
A good answer to the question "why move to nftables?" https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2016/10/28/what-comes-aft...
681.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
Apart from buying an actual dev kit like HiFive from SiFive, a great way to get into it is to buy SiFive's FPGA kits https://dev.sifive.com/freedom-soc/evaluate/fpga/ The FPGA board can be used for other
682.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
Apple has never been about spearheading the 'next big wave'. It's modus operandi has always been step in late, but do it right. VR as I see it now isn't any where close to being the big wave that people are anticipating
683.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
Are you sure? Because everyone is still waiting on the Mac mini and Mac Pro that is overdue. I really doubt apple's doing anything in the VR space.
684.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
Good luck on your project! Be sure to visit r/rust in case you have any trouble. The people over there are very helpful. There are couple books/guides around about good practices in rust. You should be able to find with proper goo
685.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
Addition to comment - Note that Douane being a kernel modules is not a bad thing. Little Snitch also installs a kernel module. I just would say it didn't go as smooth as I had hoped. It is still the closest thing that comes to Little S
686.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
I wonder how it compares to Douane[1] which is touted as the alternative to Little Snitch. I wasn't very happy with Douane since it was a kernel module and a memory bug (Think it missed a free) caused kernel panics on every single boot
687.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
I doubt that's the case anymore. With Chromebook Pixel, it was understandable because it was plain as day. In this case, it looks like they put in a lot of effort into design and the overall effort seems to show that they do want the
688.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
Although I'm a bit skeptical of its security, you might want to check out Authy.
689.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
I'm not calling it one of the BSDs, but you still have to consider who's running the show. The FreeBSD part behind pfSense is as important as the Debian beind VyOS (although I'm not suggesting VyOS here). If things are comple
690.
▲
by
ktta
9y ago
Isn't a linux headless box a great alternative to pfsense for non-commercial use? The problem here seems to be that home users now have to shell out more. If you're going to use OpenVPN and other common software, why not just move
More ›