Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ksk
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
24 ms
·
211.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
>oing something simple worked in 2000s but nowadays a single developer cannot do what was passible back then and you need a team, and as mentioned above, massive financing to be fast to market. I would like to add to this that our toolin
212.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
I think you're getting to the the crux of it. Exactly What actions make it seem like the other person has branded you as untrustworthy? Would a cashier counting the money you gave them be a sign that they don't trust you? Or an ai
213.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
I would expect someone with principles to behave differently. There certainly are principled people at Google (the recent-ish google walkouts come to mind). Maybe the principles I'm thinking of are no longer valued at Google.
214.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
>Everything everyone says about greenhouse gas benefits of remote work just went out the window as soon as air travel is mentioned. Well, but that kind of criticism applies to anything and everything. For e.g. Do you also judge whether t
215.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
As you alluded to, if you only judge something in its most optimal setting, then of course that thing seems very workable and successful. There are very few objective truths when it comes to WFH policies; there are only compromises that peo
216.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
Google is the new Trump :P (relax, its a joke)
217.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
If Google has their way, a big chunk of the web will be absorbed by AMP. I don't understand why so many talented people at Google continue to support this kind of takeover. It goes completely against the hacker ethic that built the int
218.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
It's ironic to see this news as social media companies fight against online echo chambers, and social media bubbles.
219.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
Unfortunately, this is not possible on their consumer OS branch (unless you hack the system, but I have found that it often makes the OS unstable because its in an unsupported system state). For me, our IT manages the systems. They get to d
220.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
Today's software is vastly better in UX than software in the 90s and 00. Certainly I don't attribute all of that to telemetry, but your opposite view is incorrect.
221.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
What are you basing this on? Are you talking about Windows or just random telemetry?
222.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
I fully understand the frustration after seeing people having their computers reboot in the middle of presentations and other important events. That's why they made multiple products. Consumer OS = you don't want to be the sysadmi
223.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
Agreed. I think MS has decided (for better or for worse) that the average user is not a good system admin, and/or a consumer OS shouldn't require one. Our IT maintains W10 pretty well. I have a test box in my office and I regularl
224.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
There are several ways to approach the curation/kid-friendly problem. You can have simple curation apps (which are banned in the current appstore AFAIK) that are not full stores but simply point to an app store (apple or non-apple). Yo
225.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
I agree with this policy in principle, but a ton of non-technical people in my office know that the recycle bin in Windows is never automatically emptied and rely on that fact (scary!). The 'expectation' can vary based on your exp
226.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
Well, then the good thing for you is that you have to simply not install those other stores, and keep buying from Apple's official app store. Why prevent other users/devs from using them?
227.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
Or, you can have multiple app stores and kid-friendly app stores will specially curate apps to make sure there is no adult content, or other unwanted features. We already do this with a wide variety of physical goods. Apple doesn't get
228.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
>I find it hard to see as a win for consumers based on the scummy practices of the companies in this advocacy group. Comparatively consumers are much better with Apples requirements from my perspective. Its a clear win for users and dev
229.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
That is great, you can avoid using app stores you don't trust. Why prevent other users from using stores they trust? Apple isn't the only company that can run an online store. There are countless online web stores selling all kind
230.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
If you build an OS + hardware, how are you assuming apriori that you have users and also developers who write software that targets your platform? But anyway, the answer is no you should not be legally mandated in your case of boutique prod
231.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
Its a vision document that outlines their vision. Nobody gets 100% of what they want anyway.
232.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
Its not on the outside of the box, its on the inside. Apple forbids in-app discussion. I wonder what Apple would say if the app had a browser component that directs users to a web-page. These draconian rules are such a clusterF* hope these
233.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
Anything you disagree with here? https://appfairness.org/our-vision/
234.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
What do you disagree with on this page? https://appfairness.org/our-vision/
235.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
>If you do want to use Firefox on iOS (irrespective of having your logins there or not), Secrets is also able to fill in FF using iOS's Password AutoFill feature. Well, that solves my problem!
236.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
This is the first I've heard of Secrets. Seems like a cool product! I've been relying on FF to save my web logins, but annoyingly iOS opens up links in Safari and I have to re-open them in FF to get the auto-fill to work. Any futu
237.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
The point is, what differentiates products that come out of this project from another startup that is also struggling to stay afloat? If the answer is nothing, then why should anyone treat you any differently (because those other companies
238.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en-US#infosharing "We provide personal information to our affiliates and other trusted businesses or persons to process it for us, based on our instructions and in compliance with
239.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
Indeed, I thought they might have missed it :)
240.
▲
by
ksk
6y ago
Your [1] , its here: https://www.quora.com/How-did-Steve-Jobs-thrive-in-a-technic...
More ›