ksjskskskkk

9 ms·

91.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
rclone is garbage if you need performance or just copy between two points you control. it shines when you need to sprinkle your data over many "clouds"
92.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
because in the very near future everywhere will only accept a couple issuers. not even paranoia, already happened once. just like oauth in the beginning and then everyone cried about how ugly their design was with "oauth nascar" a
93.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
this is part of the: passkeys as the ultimate centralized online identity plan.
94.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
every single newpipe problem is google actively breaking them. every time it crashed failing to parse some video is even more reason to use it!
95.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
yaml, all the xml mistakes for the new generations! can't wait for yamxslt.
96.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
karpersky writes about then from time to time. since its not the CA key but some CA signed by those CA they just revoke that one and move on and nobody cares. last year (or the one before) they discussed this at length on the mozilla chats
97.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
you forget systems have humans in them. most online banking scams hijack bank domains and use CAs for that country gov, which usually have keys leaked or sold on the right (wrong?) places. just look at india or brazil list of small govt CA
98.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
on 2: caches for one
99.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
https everywhere is literally throwing the baby with the bathwater. yeah we got a little better at hiding content, still leaking ton of metadata, and still vulnerable to all the root CAs in your browser... and lost cache and everything else
100.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
lol. kids down vote literal history
101.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
ironically, the seminal paper in economy about information asymmetry bringing overall quality downfall to the entire market was on lemon cars
102.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
> [sw] took more than six months just to get set up with the wrong information, an overly manual process, and in the end, wasn’t nearly worth the squeeze for the clients. southwest is the only one that won't give "gifts" t
103.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
everyone in this thread agrees google problem is all management and product and that buying a company is just a palliative way of acquihiring a still ungoogled management team. which don't last long, obviously. you're all just tel
104.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
you're wrong most of the time and google is too big and disfunctional to have a goal. it's just PM fiefdoms to extract profit from half done projects. if google actually had one maintenance coder it could conquer the world
105.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
when dual booting recently, i realized all the wifi security in windows is handled by the wifi driver! only noticed that because one laptop lost wpa3 after a driver update so i went looking into what's packaged on those. it's insa
106.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
sell a better solution and get rich. btw what we have today is the worse of both worlds. apple et al can tie you to a identity which you cannot use to recover your data but they can sell to advertisers or act on police requests from that pr
107.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
it was a group effort. started with ISP selling your mistyped dns queries to google or whichever search engine they could sign a deal. from there there was a race to capture as much mistyped domains until google had the end-game idea to pay
108.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
you mean optimizing for profit alone?
109.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
what two people do with their hidden browser settings is irrelevant to the world. they darkpatterned the world into using AOL Keywords.
110.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
the new "think of the children"
111.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
the same reason you deliver a big project you don't want to work on in the last minute
112.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
in this thread: people who is still learning nix, or people who barely got hooked on nix. and lastly people who looked at nix and didn't like it. absent: everyone who understand the finer details on software packaging and already imple
113.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
shoot the messenger. since you have stocks of the billion dollar message
114.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
big tech hires the same researchers as Philip Morris in the 50s
115.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
compare google QA and release process to someone bound by auto or medical industry. imagine a google peace maker. lol
116.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
Occam's razor: Google processes are all built around hosted software. they're still learning how to actually ship code to users device.
117.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
most of those examples don't even have a webapp or website.
118.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
oh, right. let me talk to the devs of imessage, which is one of the notifications hinted at the origin of this discussion last week
119.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
DRM by definition is on the client and opaque. I'm not sure where you are getting all that misplaced goodwill and hopes of lack of capabilities
120.
by ksjskskskkk 3y ago
it doesn't. companies can't author works, just own them. that's the reason de etre of the silly "made by ai" discussions.

More ›