Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ksd482
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
ksd482
3mo ago
I am not sure if you are being sarcastic because I don't know how people view IEEE "digital badges", but anything from MOOCs on LinkedIn stopped being valuable a long time ago, if it ever was.
32.
▲
by
ksd482
3mo ago
Here is the linked course in the article: https://iln.ieee.org/public/contentdetails.aspx?id=B570F53B5... $240 (non member price) for a 5 hour course. Did I read that right? Or is it more 5 hours of instructional video
33.
▲
by
ksd482
3mo ago
That's a great point. The "vocabulary resolution being low" basically just means within our own limited context, it's low. But that doesn't mean it's a good measure. Heck, I'd say it isn't.
34.
▲
by
ksd482
3mo ago
If one were to go about translating brain waves from dogs to meaning, we'd run into a big problem immediately: vocabulary resolution. What I mean by that is we'll have a very limited number of words to which a dog's brainwave
35.
▲
by
ksd482
3mo ago
That's just the wafer disc. Looks like it was presented to Sam Altman for ceremonial purposes. The wafer disc is what the CPU gets "printed" on.
36.
▲
by
ksd482
3mo ago
And they are bigger too. Everything is bigger.
37.
▲
by
ksd482
3mo ago
I wonder in the case of Francesca Gino, how much of that was driven by Harvard. I remember it was technically initiated by the Harvard business school, but it was probably triggered by data colada launching their own investigation. This spe
38.
▲
by
ksd482
3mo ago
Can you elaborate ? Recently a Harvard president, Claudine Gay was sacked. Also Francesca Gino was also punished for her (alleged still ? ) fabrication of data. So what's the problem ?
39.
▲
by
ksd482
4mo ago
I don't think an economic model would work. Only a political one would work where the government would redirect a lot of funds towards this, making it a lucrative profession. Adtech works because there is a lot of money in it. There is
40.
▲
by
ksd482
4mo ago
> we shouldn't stop insisting that things change for the better I never said we shouldn't. What I meant by "Change will always be coming. Embrace it.", is to accept it as a reality, be ready for it and prepare for it.
41.
▲
by
ksd482
4mo ago
Of course not. But expect it and prepare for it.
42.
▲
by
ksd482
4mo ago
Change is the only constant. Nothing lasts forever. Good times will come and go and so would bad times. I think as humans we are used to small time frames which are proportional to our own lifetime. But the world: say climate, population, g
43.
▲
by
ksd482
4mo ago
Yes. The difference is now the money is coming from you rather than selling your data. Which is what you want. Of course, they could still sell your data anyway. That's why it's important to pay attention to their T&C.
44.
▲
by
ksd482
4mo ago
levkk is talking about concurrency. The list you gave doesn't explain high concurrency requirements for usage.
45.
▲
by
ksd482
4mo ago
I am really sick of AI generated videos. I don't have anything against AI videos per se but the fact that it's so easy to generate videos that people are churning out really really bad quality videos out there. There's anothe
46.
▲
by
ksd482
4mo ago
LOL! My knee jerk reaction was going to be "dude, it's sarcasm". But you are way ahead of me :)
47.
▲
by
ksd482
4mo ago
Nowhere it mentioned anything about saving the progress. Can someone comment on if there's a way to autosave the files on every keystroke?
48.
▲
by
ksd482
4mo ago
Is the approach analogous to one way hash? But with mathematical statements? Given that they can’t be proven, so it’s effectively unpredictable and “un-generatable” ?
49.
▲
by
ksd482
4mo ago
> It is fraud. I think we are talking semantics here. While fraud does require intention to deceive, I get the sentiment that hallucinated citations shouldn't be dismissed as simply carelessness. It should be something stronger than
50.
▲
by
ksd482
5mo ago
I think it's a cool idea. It could be great for discovering new papers in a fun way.
51.
▲
by
ksd482
5mo ago
It’s clear my comment is unpopular. I genuinely thought it would be well received. And I think what you are trying to communicate is your disagreement. Which is totally fine. I don’t claim to be right. I’m here to learn. I accept I could be
52.
▲
by
ksd482
5mo ago
But 3b1b videos provide neither (1) nor (2). And they don't claim to either.
53.
▲
by
ksd482
5mo ago
Range?
54.
▲
by
ksd482
5mo ago
> I like YouTube content like 3Blue1Brown You are the first one I know who said that. Thank you for saying that! I think his videos are amazing but they are NOT meant to teach you the material. They are providing a high level intuition w
55.
▲
by
ksd482
5mo ago
Another way of looking at this is "getting early feedback" by failing fast. It's another way of doing things and not necessarily incompetence.
56.
▲
by
ksd482
5mo ago
Are you disagreeing with the explanation? I am curious why. It makes sense to me. Move slowly and deliberately while avoiding big mistakes. As opposed to moving fast and making big mistakes which by comparison is slower.
57.
▲
by
ksd482
1y ago
Most of the world depends on China for goods, thus trade.
58.
▲
by
ksd482
2y ago
Thank you for the recommendation. Did you mean section 5.6? That's LLMs and RL. Section 5.4 is Imitation Learning.
59.
▲
by
ksd482
2y ago
Bitcoin has no intrinsic value. It is not backed by anything real. Gold has its uses. It’s a pretty metal and has practical uses in engineering and medicine. It has been a choice for jewelry for thousands of years.
60.
▲
by
ksd482
2y ago
orev is not talking about people. He's talking about market forces. That is, device manufacturing companies.
More ›