ks1723

9 ms·

31.
by ks1723 3y ago
Just to add to this, only the two learning rates are changed, everything else including initialization and data is fixed. From the paper: Training consists of 500 (sometimes 1000) iterations of full batch steepest gradient descent. Training
32.
by ks1723 3y ago
No, it is not wrong. I think your statement comes from a rather short sighted view on scientific and technological developments. We need progress as a society and as humankind to develop and further advance our (currently rather poor) state
33.
by ks1723 3y ago
Ha, it’s just that I am old ;-) Thanks for the link!
34.
by ks1723 3y ago
Hmm, interesting. I really wonder how I could miss this all my life. (Would have made them here as well, but not anymore) Edit: spelling
35.
by ks1723 3y ago
Interestingly I became aware of a similar cultural difference regarding punctuation: I frequently use three dots ‚…‘ in more informal emails at the end of a sentence to indicate that I am not sure about something yet or still wondering abou
36.
by ks1723 3y ago
Ok, then I misunderstood, and we can only agree to disagree. I think there need to be people caring about organizational stuff which you cannot fully formulate as engineering problem: setting deadlines, putting teams together, determining t
37.
by ks1723 3y ago
I agree with you and you basically make the same point as wanted to make: you can’t just frame it as an engineering problem, it involves accountants and bosses. So your original statement „If you frame it properly to engineers, they can sol
38.
by ks1723 3y ago
This is too simple. For large endeavors (building a plane) it is impossible to formulate all contributions to all quality criteria/cost and constraints into a technical engineering optimization problem. Let alone when re-structuring an
39.
by ks1723 4y ago
As a side question: What is the NIST post-quantum debacle? Could you give some references?
40.
by ks1723 5y ago
Sorry, this is just wrong. Bell‘s inequality and the very related Bell-Kochen-Specker theorem [1] state that local hidden variables (one ball is blue, one is red, but we just don’t know it) are not consistent with QM. [1] https:/&#x2F
41.
by ks1723 6y ago
I fully agree to the last point. He had (and probably/hopefully continues to have) very interesting discussions on all kinds of topics ranging from physics to biology to philosophy to psychology to social topics to ... in his mindscape
42.
by ks1723 6y ago
This is a little too simplistic/misleading - yes, QM is linear in terms of states, vector spaces and operators acting on states (its just functional analysis [1]) - it’s not linear in terms of how probability distributions and states b
43.
by ks1723 6y ago
First of all this is quite interesting and I appreciate your effort, thanks! And since I am currently looking for a lean time tracker which runs locally for a single user without any internet and cloud stuff, this is very useful. I fully ag
44.
by ks1723 7y ago
I am not so sure about this since i read this Insider view: https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/bdfqm4/the_real_rea...
45.
Destabilizing turbulence in pipe flow(nature.com)
1 points by ks1723 9y ago|0 comments
46.
by ks1723 9y ago
What i found quite surprising in that context, is that the volume of the n-dimensional ball for any finite fixed radius goes to zero as n goes to infinity (see, for example, section "high dimensions" of https://en.m.wik