Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
krisoft
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
31.
▲
by
krisoft
2mo ago
I did a test a few months ago. A friend of mine wanted to develop what i understood to be a simple single page web app. But since she didn’t have any software engineering experience she asked me to help. Around that time everyone was talkin
32.
▲
by
krisoft
2mo ago
Curious that none of the attempts draw the frog from side profile. If i have to draw this i would immediately know that drawing a recognisable frog is the easy part of job. Expressing a particular jaw shape and melding it on the frog is the
33.
▲
by
krisoft
2mo ago
> this is a tangent but you should revisit your assumptions about giraffe anatomy I don't know. This is the scenario i was thinking of: I imagine a giraffe taking a palette of goods (maybe 1200kg) into its mouth and trying to lift i
34.
▲
by
krisoft
2mo ago
> giraffes for warehouses. I’m not even sure if you are joking there or haven’t thought your proposal through. Sure giraffes are tall, but they can barelly lift any weight. What use would a robotically controlled giraffe be in a warehous
35.
▲
by
krisoft
2mo ago
I wouldn't think that should be a problem here if there is any sanity how the system is implemented. With a normal (short stay, long stay) parking lot it is expected that cars leave all the time. A thief breaking into your car and driv
36.
▲
by
krisoft
2mo ago
There are some horror stories when those kind of systems break down. For example this one is about a van which got stuck in one for two years: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx207jwknp5o Or there was one in S
37.
▲
by
krisoft
2mo ago
A fenced off flat parking lot with a few cameras here and there. Not sure what you expect.
38.
▲
by
krisoft
2mo ago
> Just look at the Boeing 737 MAX. That is the best example for an unstable aircraft. No. Not in the aerodynamical sense. The Boeing 737 MAX is stable. In this sense: "The term stability refers to the tendency of an aircraft to rema
39.
▲
by
krisoft
3mo ago
Maybe. But also if the thing was not documented for years, then maybe the users learned how to use it without documentation? Or at least how to get what they need done. People won't read documentation of something they already know (or
40.
▲
by
krisoft
3mo ago
I don’t know if you know this but Peter Pan’s copyright is weird in the UK. There is a legislated exception in the law that it never expires and the royalties will forever go to a specific children hospital. Here are the actual words: http
41.
▲
by
krisoft
3mo ago
That sounds good, but wouldn’t you worry that the same hackers will let themselves in via the same route again? You would need to understand first how they gained access and verify that they can’t do the same again. That in itself could tak
42.
▲
by
krisoft
3mo ago
Yeah. Stuff happens. There is the famous case of dropping the NOAA N-Prime weather satellite on the ground. They were trying to turn it from vertical to horizontal and they forgot to bolt it to the adapter. Worse: multiple people signed the
43.
▲
by
krisoft
3mo ago
> 30-day survival for out-of-hospital CPR is 10% Okay. And what is the 30-day survival for cases where CPR would be otherwise indicated but are not performed? It is a bit like complaining that jumping out of a burning airplane with a par
44.
▲
by
krisoft
3mo ago
At least yours can be in theory solved. (Given infinite amount of compute, great luck, or a very serious breakthrough in attacking the hash function.) Even harder would be an empty prompt, and the only accepted response would be a megabyte
45.
▲
by
krisoft
3mo ago
[flagged]
46.
▲
by
krisoft
4mo ago
Have you considered that maybe your sewing machine is faulty in some way? Either the model or the particular instance of it. I’m also a complete sewing machine noob. We have a sewing machine at our hackspace, someone gave me a minute long t
47.
▲
by
krisoft
4mo ago
> The information is there. Well. Not really? Of course a lot of information is available but still there is a lot of open questions. Just considering the Great Pyramid of Giza: was it built with an external or an internal ramp? What was
48.
▲
by
krisoft
4mo ago
> it doesn't make sense to do a job you'd hate That assumes using/not using ai will make me hate the job. Which is not true at all for me. Would be perfectly happy either way. (Or rather to say my happyness would depend on
49.
▲
by
krisoft
4mo ago
On the nuclear side I think the danger is purely reputational damage towards the company behind the LLM. If a journalist can prompt the LLM to tell them how to build a nuclear warhead. Even if the output text is nothing specific, or not eve
50.
▲
by
krisoft
4mo ago
It is. But doesn’t fit with the rest of the sentence. “In a television studio, theatre or concert hall, the room where performers await their entrance.” https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/green_room
51.
▲
by
krisoft
4mo ago
> people who are full of quickly-formed opinions My quickly formed opinion is that you are emotionaly disregulated and unpleasant to chat with. That is the only opinion i hold about the whole topic. > constantly trying to offload the
52.
▲
by
krisoft
4mo ago
Do you feel the same way about walking? If you wanted to get anywhere on land pre Bronze age your only option was to walk. Then we started riding horses, later we invented carriages, much much later bicycles, cars, and airplanes. Do these a
53.
▲
by
krisoft
4mo ago
> Cube; that was done in 3 weeks The cube was not “done” in 3 weeks. Maybe they shot it in 3 weeks, but there were years of pre-production, and at least months of post-production. (According to wikipedia.) Saying that it was done in 3 we
54.
▲
by
krisoft
4mo ago
> Loss of human life in a static fire is criminal. True. And yet it is not without precedent. Scaled Composites had an explosion while performing a cold flow test of SpaceShipTwo’s engine which killed 3. https://www.latimes.co
55.
▲
by
krisoft
5mo ago
> Why are you being mean? They are not. They are blunt. > why are you defending slop? Because they don’t believe it is slop. They believe you are unable to comprehend a not too advanced literary device and based on that accusing that
56.
▲
by
krisoft
5mo ago
How do you know that is a “gut ecosystem collapse” as opposed to hypermotility? Or an overgrowth of the gut ecosystem? Or a problem with the intestinal lining? Observing that if you eat/drink something specific then you get the shits i
57.
▲
by
krisoft
5mo ago
> if you take the highly reciprocal data of a biological connectome and unroll it into a DAG, you suddenly see motifs popping up that look similar to what we find in AI That sounds interesting. Where have you heard about that? Or is this
58.
▲
by
krisoft
5mo ago
> you'd rather say Andreessen-Horowitz, which is just as arbitrary as a16z Yes. I know Andreessen-Horowitz and I don’t know a16z. Reading the title i thought it will be about the cryptography serialisation specification. Turns out i
59.
▲
by
krisoft
5mo ago
> This study is based almost entirely on pre-existing "vignettes." This is basically the only way how to ethically approach the topic. First you verify performance on “vignettes” as you say. Then if the performance appears sati
60.
▲
by
krisoft
5mo ago
But that does follow. The economics working is not some outside factor. If the robot “could do the task” but would cost more than paying a human to do the same task then the robot “does not work”. It is frequently because the robot would be
More ›