krapp

98 ms·

961.
by krapp 7mo ago
It's always morally correct to celebrate the death of evil men.
962.
by krapp 7mo ago
Which is weird because the right explicitly called for violence against the left and transgender people in response but nothing ever happened to any of them.
963.
by krapp 8mo ago
That's going to be good money once the crash happens.
964.
by krapp 8mo ago
That's a lot of words to say "I prefer to ignore the evil that men do if I find them entertaining enough, and I think it's silly that anyone does otherwise." The Chuck Norris you admire is a figment of your imagination.
965.
by krapp 8mo ago
>Observing Islam does not make one Islamic. Observing ontological evil does not make one ontological evil. No, by your own words, "People who believe in ontological[sic] evil are ontologically evil people" If you believe that I
966.
by krapp 8mo ago
So people who believe in ontological evil are themselves ontologically evil. But because you believe this, you yourself believe in ontological evil, and therefore are ontologically evil. Weird flex but OK.
967.
by krapp 8mo ago
Unlike Chuck Norris I'm the life of the party.
968.
by krapp 8mo ago
Not even every important influential person in tech gets the black bar. You think an actor who is mostly known for low-effort internet memes and pretending to be a cowboy on tv deserves it?
969.
by krapp 8mo ago
>Who decides how much AI usage is permitted. In this specific case, the publishers. More broadly, government and society at large.
970.
by krapp 8mo ago
Hacker News is designed under the assumption that the quality of a discussion decreases and the likelihood of arguments/flamewars increases over time, and as the ratio of comments to upvotes increases. If you aren't willing to to
971.
by krapp 8mo ago
Uh oh. Looks like we're gonna have to cut spending on science, regulation, infrastructure and social programs even more.
972.
by krapp 8mo ago
Because people in the former group don't criticize those countries, they criticize Islam, and tend to categorize all Muslims (specifically Muslim immigrants) as ontologically evil. Meanwhile people in the latter group tend to be very s
973.
by krapp 8mo ago
They either voted for the authoritarian or they don't care as long as the authoritarian doesn't touch their guns. Womp womp.
974.
by krapp 8mo ago
Kamala was always obviously a better option than Trump. Let's not pretend people didn't know who and what Trump was, or that his behavior after 2024 came as a shock to anyone.
975.
by krapp 8mo ago
This site offers a public, non rate-limted API. IANAL but I'm reasonably certain that's authorization for anyone to use the data as long as they do so through the API. It certainly isn't the case that you need explicit legal
976.
by krapp 8mo ago
The anti-trust argument doesn't work for me. Neither Youtube nor any other single platform represent a "sector" in the way Standard Oil or Ma Bell represented a "sector", they don't "control the algorithm&
977.
by krapp 8mo ago
Some amount of government helps to some degree, otherwise government and anarchy should be indistinguishable, which is obviously not the case.
978.
by krapp 8mo ago
No, because people exist outside of government.
979.
by krapp 8mo ago
Netflix does it to drive engagement as well.
980.
by krapp 8mo ago
But algorithmic feeds can actually be useful for discovery of related material - I want Youtube to show me more Japanese jazz and video essays about true crime based on my watch history, I wanted Twitter to show me more accounts from wr
981.
by krapp 8mo ago
I don't think any social media platform has ever actually tried to present themselves as the entirety of the internet. I don't think anyone actually believes social media platforms comprise the entirety of the internet, either. Bu
982.
by krapp 8mo ago
Molerat at least seems to use Markdown but many do seem to be "Gemini but X." I wonder how much use any of those get?
983.
by krapp 8mo ago
>But I do not know a single developer who isn't using LLMs with a passion, even if its only just cursor and auto-complete A passion for using LLMs, not for making games. If they had a passion for making games they would recognize ho
984.
by krapp 8mo ago
If it makes the game in its entirety then it isn't a tool and those qualities don't factor in to the end product.
985.
by krapp 8mo ago
Given how many people on HN say they like Gemini in principle but wish it weren't so restrictive, some people would use it. All of those people might just be that cross section of HN users, however.
986.
by krapp 8mo ago
>Acting like most people made good and enjoyable games when it was handcoded is just not right. Every good and enjoyable game made was handcoded, with art, music, dialogue and design created with intent. I have yet to see a game created
987.
by krapp 8mo ago
The problem is your passion is for the LLM workflow and not the games, and the end result is going to be a powerful way to generate mediocre games.
988.
by krapp 8mo ago
Ideological zealots are more or less the only people who hate the modern web so much that they want to quarantine themselves within an entirely different and functionally limited protocol or ecosystem. Everyone else is fine discussing campi
989.
by krapp 8mo ago
Didn't the creator of the protocol go on a rant when someone made a browser for Gemini that included a favicon? I can't imagine the backlash if someone tried to normalize Markdown. Isn't the entire point of Gemini that it can
990.
by krapp 8mo ago
>A minute of silence to mourn the lost art of making games with passion. There are still... dozens of us left!

More ›