krackers

5 ms·

61.
by krackers 2mo ago
I had hoped the OP article would have gone into more depth on the intuition as to why you'd expect deltanets to work at all. It seems like we're going back to LSTMs and RNNs where you compress the history back into a fixed-size hi
62.
by krackers 2mo ago
There was a longform post on twitter which went through the same derivation at a bit higher level https://x.com/waterloo_intern/article/2081762065392541951 and in particular this image which clarifies the key esse
63.
by krackers 2mo ago
Where is there no way to view deleted wikipedia articles? Apparently only admins have access, which doesn't make sense for articles deleted for mundane reasons.
64.
by krackers 2mo ago
>reading are for a model that doesn’t exist anymore It's worse than that, the _same model_ from the same company can be quietly changed.
65.
by krackers 2mo ago
This may not account for enshittification. Clothes are "cheaper" in both senses of the word. Same for furnishings.
66.
by krackers 2mo ago
Apparently at least one of the apps mentioned does that. From the article >A Pac-Man smart TV app from Bright Data offers users the choice between viewing ads in the game or agreeing to allow their TV to serve as a residential proxy node
67.
by krackers 3mo ago
Shouldn't you use echo instead of cat?
68.
by krackers 3mo ago
Sodium vapor lamps didn't exactly have high CRI either
69.
by krackers 3mo ago
>C is twisted and weird. Why do you say this? I've admittedly never done a proper complex analysis course but I got the impression that that complex differentiability was a very strong condition that results in holomprhic functions
70.
by krackers 3mo ago
>Wasn't it proven true in general for n=2 Assuming you mean C^2 -> C^2, Do you have a link? If so it would be good to add to the wikipedia page. Also I'm not sure, but does the fact that there's a disproof for n=3 imply
71.
by krackers 3mo ago
Which tweet has the chain of thought? I was curious how it discovered this, did it use some symbolic brute force or some clever trick? Also is that the raw or summarized COT, it seems to have the hallmarks of raw COT (the frequent interject
72.
by krackers 3mo ago
I think another way to understand it is the generalization of the inverse function theorem. The inverse function theorem gives you local invertibility, but even being "locally invertible" everywhere does not imply global invertibi
73.
by krackers 3mo ago
I mean if someone came to you with a value of n that disproved collatz, wouldn't you go crazy as well?
74.
by krackers 3mo ago
I think the map sends (1, -3/2, 13/2), -> (-1/4, 0, 0) and also (-1, 3/2, 13/2) -> (-1/4, 0, 0) so it's not invertable which disprove the jacobian conjecture that polynomial maps over complex number
75.
by krackers 3mo ago
The surprising thing is that the counterexample seems relatively "simple" in that it's low degree, with coefficients that aren't too large. Does anyone more familiar with this know why this _wasn't_ found earlier, w
76.
by krackers 3mo ago
I thought the whole point of turnstile was that it detects headless browsers and it's supposed to be "difficult" to bypass. Apparently this just simulates clicking on the checkmark. Is it really that easy?
77.
by krackers 3mo ago
isn't this what they called a "ralph loop"?
78.
by krackers 3mo ago
Do they plan to have a whitelist of games? I guess they could remove rosetta support for most Cocoa frameworks while keeping OpenGL translation layer.
79.
by krackers 3mo ago
>But software that actually fucking works AND does what you want is still expensive as hell. Skilled craftsmen said the same thing, and yet everyone seems to prefer $1 Temu slop that breaks in a year.
80.
by krackers 3mo ago
Doctors generally aren't trained in systemic level thinking, probably because given how complex the body is any such broad connections can only be "intuitive" rather than rigorous, more an art than a science. This is probably
81.
by krackers 3mo ago
training on the test set is all you need
82.
by krackers 3mo ago
Not if the others tie for first place.
83.
by krackers 3mo ago
> it’s only when you fully understand the problem you can generalize Peter Naur explained this decades ago >Peter Naur argues that programming is fundamentally a human activity of building a mental "theory" - a deep conceptu
84.
by krackers 3mo ago
>Tell it you're in Africa. A great variant of the gay jailbreak https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47977134
85.
by krackers 3mo ago
A lot of data these days is synthetically generated. As an example, to make a model good at understanding assembly you simply need to round-trip code through a compiler and disassembler, then train against the source of truth and the assemb
86.
by krackers 3mo ago
On the face of it, yes? Emotions are very salient part of text, and as a language model you'd hope that it models them. I think the more surprising finding is that J-space is actually less load bearing than you'd assume, that you
87.
by krackers 3mo ago
>so how did he end up with something like that Is it not possible that the interventions were the cause of the disease? There's a lot about the body we don't understand, if you're mainlining supplements daily and doing blo
88.
by krackers 3mo ago
Oh I guess another thing related to all of this, is prior work on steering vectors. "Manipulating the j-space" seems not too different from steering, both ultimately work on the residual stream. I think perhaps it makes more sense
89.
by krackers 3mo ago
>J-lens beats a plain logit lens on some architectures and does nothing on others, and it isn't about size The paper talked about this, the jacobian matrix corrects for the shift in basis from initial to final layer compared to logi
90.
by krackers 3mo ago
>"it's a data stream" I knew the answer was going to be reservoir sampling. But it's only an approximate percentile. Unless the interviewer mentions that an approximate solution is OK, you would be stuck. (And it&#x27

More ›