Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kovyrin
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
Resources for Technical Operations Engineers
(kovyrin.net)
11 points
by
kovyrin
13y ago
|
0 comments
32.
▲
MySQL Monitoring with Cacti using 1-minute resolution
(kovyrin.net)
1 points
by
kovyrin
13y ago
|
0 comments
33.
▲
by
kovyrin
15y ago
Since there is no patch available for the latest Ruby Enterprise Edition, we've made a quick port of the official ruby solution: http://kovyrin.net/2011/12/29/ree-hash-collision-patch/
34.
▲
by
kovyrin
15y ago
MongoDb? ;-)
35.
▲
by
kovyrin
15y ago
You know, we never complained about cpu, memory, disk or network performance. The only real complaints were about the fact that no cloud instances had uptime of more than a week. I'm totally OK with shit being slow (we could always optimize
36.
▲
by
kovyrin
15y ago
Yeah, even if one could scale up his web/app farms 2400% so fast, I'd really like to see a database that scales up/out this well :-)
37.
▲
by
kovyrin
15y ago
Damn, this is exactly what I was experiencing: when I'd ask "wtf? how comes your management would not see the trend" I' d constantly receive "you're the only customer experiencing this problem!" bullshit.
38.
▲
by
kovyrin
15y ago
Yeah, we run 100+ dedicated boxes for 3 years now and our experience is really great. Hence the rant - why couldn't they provide the same quality of service and support for their cloud offering?
39.
▲
by
kovyrin
15y ago
Yes, their dedicated servers hosting is just awesome - the best I've seen! But their cloud stuff is terrible and this is what made me really frustrated and guess about it being a 3rd party service poorly integrated - their cloud offering su
40.
▲
by
kovyrin
15y ago
The thing is, all our cloud instances were redundant so SL downtimes almost never caused real service disruptions on the site. But when one instance dies, there is a huge chance that other one (two, five, ten) will die soon as well. As for
41.
▲
Softlayer Cloud: An operations guy's rant about really bad service
(kovyrin.net)
115 points
by
kovyrin
15y ago
|
40 comments
42.
▲
by
kovyrin
16y ago
I'd personally hate all my reading (including shit I open but do not like/read) to be shared on my account. Having control over what is shared is good IMHO.
43.
▲
Rails Can Scale
(kovyrin.net)
4 points
by
kovyrin
16y ago
|
0 comments
44.
▲
DB Charmer – ActiveRecord Connection Magic Plugin
(kovyrin.net)
1 points
by
kovyrin
17y ago
|
0 comments
45.
▲
Advanced Squid Caching in Scribd: Logged In Users and Complex URLs Handling
(kovyrin.net)
19 points
by
kovyrin
17y ago
|
0 comments
46.
▲
by
kovyrin
18y ago
Why would nginx be a bottleneck? and What kind of bottleneck do you mean?
47.
▲
by
kovyrin
18y ago
Actually I didn't want to freak you out :-) Of course we've heard (and even used) caching reverse proxies - I've just explained the flow of our thoughts and words in the chat room during the brainstorming. I mean one thing is when you know
48.
▲
by
kovyrin
18y ago
Actually squid is fast enough for us :-) And, as I already pointed out in comments to the post: Before choosing Squid 3.0 I've discussed this with percona guys (which I really trust since I worked there quite a while) and they shared with m