kouru225

28 ms·

361.
by kouru225 3y ago
Aren’t cigarettes a more stable currency?
362.
by kouru225 3y ago
Wouldn’t that still be a beneficial thing? It’s like how I don’t need a plumber but if I did need a plumber I’d go reach for the last one I remember.
363.
by kouru225 3y ago
I don’t disagree with the fact that all these things (government, psychiatry etc) function similar to how religion used to function, but I do vehemently disagree with the fact that these things are bullshit. Ever thought that the reason wh
364.
by kouru225 3y ago
It’s comments like this that completely prove my point. The idea that psychiatry is “religious” is absurd.
365.
by kouru225 3y ago
I don’t think I was implying that science intended to reject religion. I don’t think it matters what the scientific community intended though. Currently, science socially functions as a rejection of religion regardless of what the leaders o
366.
by kouru225 3y ago
I never said religion was correct. I said that science tries so hard to differentiate itself from religion that it labels anything that doesn’t appear to be logical as pseudoscience. Since the subconscious isn’t logical, subconscious issues
367.
by kouru225 3y ago
Honestly I feel like the science community’s disregard for religion has caused them to completely fail at dealing with human psychology. Science has spent the last 1.5 centuries presenting itself as a counterpoint to religion, but they fail
368.
by kouru225 3y ago
Ngl I actually see this as a condemnation of photography. It means that peoples notions of what’s beautiful is kinda stale and static.
369.
by kouru225 3y ago
I also used to move my cursor with high accuracy and I wish it was still an option.
370.
by kouru225 3y ago
Oh Jesus Christ this is terrifying
371.
by kouru225 3y ago
I don’t want humans on Mars. What would they do there? Sounds like a terrible idea.
372.
by kouru225 3y ago
Yea The Ramones were punk And don’t anyone tell me they were “proto-punk” that’s just ridiculous
373.
by kouru225 3y ago
I’d be fine with a dub if they kept the same sound design, but sound design is way more important than dialogue imo. Yea I’ll definitely watch with subs. I got absolutely no fear about that for a foreign movie. For an English movie though I
374.
by kouru225 3y ago
As long as they don’t mess with it I’m fine. I recently accidentally watched Castle In the Sky with the English dub and I was so angry at the terrible changes they made to the sound design. The opening scene in the Japanese version is compl
375.
by kouru225 3y ago
You can do that if you want to risk a legal battle, but Youtube doesn't care about your legal battle until its over. The fact of the matter is that footage can be copyrighted and videographers have the right to protect their copyright.
376.
by kouru225 3y ago
No. As someone who works in documentaries, you absolutely have to license footage of public figures, including news footage. There’s a reason most news media shoot their own footage. If you are commentating on it and making significant chan
377.
by kouru225 3y ago
>100% clips of public figures with no commentary. Demonetized. Doesn’t sound like satire or commentary to me
378.
by kouru225 3y ago
I walk by this all the time. There’s a big glass entrance on one side with a doorman and everything so it’s not exactly one giant slab on concrete.
379.
by kouru225 3y ago
The economic incentive should be for you to create as much good content as possible. If you have a continuous relationship between time listened and money generated, then it doesn’t matter if you have one 40 minute song or 15 songs totaling
380.
by kouru225 3y ago
Why is it that a “play” is defined by a discrete threshold line 30 seconds? Isn’t it way more logical to define some continuous relationship between amount of time played and amount of money generated like it’s done on YouTube?
381.
by kouru225 3y ago
Does the metaverse count though? /s
382.
by kouru225 3y ago
I tag a lot. Some notes still fall between the cracks though so recently I’ve been setting aside certain tags for dataview. I have so far a “review” tag and a “relevant” tag for notes that I need to reread to see if they’re relevant and not
383.
by kouru225 3y ago
Looks like you can get it an annasarchive
384.
by kouru225 3y ago
Reading “JQ” in this context makes me realize how terminally online I’ve been all these years
385.
by kouru225 3y ago
There was an early art collective called the videofreex that defined what you’re talking about in terms of channel direction. Basically they defined media in the 1980s as being one-way channels where there was no response from the audience
386.
by kouru225 3y ago
Relating may be the wrong word. Its one thing to empathize with someone’s pov, but it’s another to recreate it. We all are living, in some respect, in response to our environment. You can empathize with another’s pov but that doesn’t mean y
387.
by kouru225 3y ago
I was sort of exaggerating. I do get how it can be a useful process but it does seem like the author had blind faith in that type of organization without understanding the pros and cons of it, and I do think that the cons are way bigger tha
388.
by kouru225 3y ago
It doesn’t help to find different thoughts on the same issue because you can’t relate to the majority of them. When you find out that you, yourself, came to different opinions of the same subject, then you end up having a practical understa
389.
by kouru225 3y ago
They did this in Brooklyn in 2020 and a lot of people I know won’t ever forgive the cops for that. They kettled them and then beat them with batons. They had been completely peaceful.
390.
by kouru225 3y ago
I never understood the purpose of doing the daily note for these apps but I completely disagree with the author. Multiple times now I’ve been writing, gotten stuck, went to go look at relevant notes, and found a note thinking about the issu

More ›