kortilla

12 ms·

301.
by kortilla 9mo ago
They aren’t being threatened. They are already starving and this is giving them an opportunity out.
302.
by kortilla 9mo ago
It doesn’t matter what the average is though. If 1% of software is open source, there is significantly more closed source software out there and given normal skills distributions, that means there is at least as much high quality closed sou
303.
by kortilla 9mo ago
It has nothing to do with “incurious”. Being asked to draw the architecture for something that is abstracted away from your actual job is a dickhead move because it’s just a test for “do you have the same interests as me?” It’s no different
304.
by kortilla 9mo ago
>Ingress/egress are almost always a major bottleneck - how is bandwidth cheaper in space? Free space optics are much faster than data to/from the ground. If the training workloads only require high bandwidth between sats, this
305.
by kortilla 9mo ago
But how would that work? There isn’t unlimited money so who decides what software to support with state money and which developers? I don’t have trust in a bureaucracy to decide which developers should get paid to work on sudo. Just look at
306.
by kortilla 9mo ago
Can you link to some lists or an example discussion to seed my list to follow? Mastodon seems stalled out but I think it’s just a discoverability issue.
307.
by kortilla 9mo ago
There’s no criticism there. Calling people racists and bots is not criticism, it’s just name calling. There is nothing critical about it.
308.
by kortilla 9mo ago
I don’t understand the purpose of this comment given the context. People with plenty of real purpose and substance do post to Twitter (e.g. Andrej Karpathy).
309.
by kortilla 9mo ago
Im not comparing it to Tesla, im comparing it to any normal successful company (apple, google, nvidia, Exxon, whatever). Boeing is an anemic company that doesn’t innovate and it should have been allowed to bankrupt and break off into busine
310.
by kortilla 9mo ago
>Now instead of having NASA run it we SpaceX pay more than we'd ever have paid NASA for the same thing. This doesn’t pass the smell test given that the cost of launch with spacex is lower than it ever was under ULA. NASA has never b
311.
by kortilla 9mo ago
Being too big to fail is not really a desirable outcome, it’s just better than failure. Boeing is too important to fail as well but it’s been terrible as a shareholder
312.
by kortilla 9mo ago
Gmail is almost identical today as it was when it first launched. It just has fancier JavaScript
313.
by kortilla 9mo ago
Because of incentive alignment. They are the only ones incentivized not to do something stupid with their own resources.
314.
by kortilla 9mo ago
Capitalism doesn’t preach to be a solution for monopolistic behavior of actors that accumulate too much power. It’s a known downside of capitalism that has to be actively managed by the state. Capitalism has still delivered with massive suc
315.
by kortilla 9mo ago
It’s actually accepted as the primary now and telling people about “champing” is just seen as archaic.
316.
by kortilla 9mo ago
Wtf is your point? That’s what the moderators do here
317.
by kortilla 9mo ago
The plane will run out of fuel during step 1 or while on the way to an airport that has already completed step 1.
318.
by kortilla 9mo ago
> slid under the radar of the public consciousness. It is shady BS, and it’s why this phrase appeared in the article. Just because industry insiders are aware doesn’t mean it’s not shady. The same applies to modern cars reporting their i
319.
by kortilla 9mo ago
A phone knows if it’s dialing 911. It can activate features on this criteria
320.
by kortilla 9mo ago
Resource allocation without it is not a solved problem
321.
by kortilla 9mo ago
It got downvoted because it had no info about why you claimed there was no improvement. SpaceX wouldn’t waste money developing a system that had no improvement over what space force already offers.
322.
by kortilla 9mo ago
>from one direction, stopping at a median, and then crossing further over. This assumes a median, which is not present at most smaller roundabouts in the US.
323.
by kortilla 9mo ago
What do you call the moderators reposting stories they think would be good on the front page to “give them another chance”?
324.
by kortilla 9mo ago
“Letting quality sift to the top” implies that there is a way for this to happen without curation. Pure user vote driven things like Reddit are a failure (echo chambers, emotional appeals, bot rings, etc). So I’m curious what you think woul
325.
by kortilla 9mo ago
Reels skews older in the user-base, which skews the average to the right.
326.
by kortilla 9mo ago
It doesn’t matter how many times it sounded. It matters that it stopped while still in a stall and began again during the process of recovering the stall. When you’re panicking and the airplane is telling you what you’re doing is starting t
327.
by kortilla 9mo ago
IMO that’s the wrong take about that crash. The stall warning stopped once the attitude was above a certain amount, which was an insane decision on airbus’s part. You can see in the CVR that the stall indicator stopped many times despite th
328.
by kortilla 9mo ago
> I don't understand how people are dismissing that so easily Because that’s not where 99.9999% of attacks come from Fire up a web server on a public ipv4 address and you’ll get hundreds of requests per day from bots probing endpoin
329.
by kortilla 9mo ago
The destination IP header from the internet belongs to the router. There is nothing internal to connect to without NAT.
330.
by kortilla 9mo ago
Nobody on the Internet can send a packet to an internal IP on your network except for immediate L2 neighbors (I.e. your ISP). Symmetric NAT 100% stops inbound unsolicited connections to the public IP. And using the public IP is the only way

More ›