korroziya

15 ms·

91.
by korroziya 4y ago
Thank you for proving my point.
92.
by korroziya 4y ago
Most of the writers for the Atlanic are dead wrong (hell most op-eds are regardless of source) but David Brooks is a "conservative" by liberal standards so people on HN and Twitter love to call him out more than their progressive
93.
by korroziya 4y ago
It's as bad as you think: pompous and reads like we're all idiots and the author is that one guy at the high school party who was fixated on being the "smartest guy" in the room. Edit: Dead blog link.
94.
by korroziya 4y ago
What's wrong with any of those statements?
95.
by korroziya 4y ago
The fact that you don't know who he is does not help your argument. EVs have a large carbon footprint that takes time to balance, and they won't be replacing ICEs anytime soon.
96.
by korroziya 4y ago
Tried doing a newsletter in my final year of highschool, around the time of the 2008 financial crisis. Got a couple classmates and a few bemused teachers signed up, and once a month wrote up 500 words talking about what was going on in our
97.
by korroziya 4y ago
It's sad that HN has been infested with this level of sensationalist ridiculouness.
98.
by korroziya 4y ago
Just curious, how many "daily" deaths are there from extracting gas out of the ground?
99.
by korroziya 4y ago
You can tell from their wording that they have a "renewables good, oil bad" mantra. Like I said, they're happy to mention deaths stemming from fossil fuels, but not mention the lives that were helped by that form of energy. I
100.
by korroziya 4y ago
>Compare that to the daily deaths due to mining coal, extracting gas, shipping those to the fossil fuels to power stations, and the deaths due to fossil fuel pollution including those from climate change Oh go join Greenpeace already. I
101.
by korroziya 4y ago
Your link is from a trade association made up of Solar power interests. How is that any less biased?