kordless

55 ms·

511.
by kordless 10y ago
The drainer of the DAO well might have a point arguing it is "legal" to do, given the protocol allows it. Solving that without a hard fork will be exceedingly enlightening. Solving social problems is a separate problem entirely, g
512.
by kordless 10y ago
Heaven knows, anything goes.
513.
by kordless 10y ago
Agreed. Apple is only doing as much security as they reasonably needed to satisfy customers. Most customers don't understand the various types of suffering (and suffering risk I might add) caused by software, but large companies do. La
514.
by kordless 10y ago
I'd prefer some action items from meetings like these. What we need is an interledger + IPFS integration with some form of ledgered/DAO backed deployment mechanism. This will give us high trust software deployments that also scale
515.
by kordless 10y ago
You can also do this with PG&E accounts. Based on my conversations with them about it, it appears to be a feature.
516.
by kordless 10y ago
> If, in a given case, implementation and intent are the same thing, then any instance of “theft” is in fact a donation, and any instance of “loss” is voluntary money-burning, economically equivalent to a proportional donation to the ETH
517.
by kordless 10y ago
Someone should be working on spaceship guidance software with UI interfaces for humans. We're going to need it.
518.
by kordless 10y ago
Our propensity to decouple suffering from causality is disconcerting. Complete elimination of suffering equals complete integration of all interests. Sounds fairly inefficient to me.
519.
by kordless 10y ago
While I agree with your points, I think the ongoing assumption we can effectively emulate the emotional response of the ones who are actually are affected is starting to really get in the way. The expectation humanity can eliminate all suff
520.
by kordless 10y ago
i.e. probabilities.
521.
by kordless 10y ago
Fuck Apple. The only thing they are programmed to care about is the bottom line and getting more users. That programming is complicated and unlikely to change to suit the consumer's needs, or desires.
522.
by kordless 10y ago
It's time for an Open Communications initiative. Time for companies to stop owning the platform. Time for all of us to stand up for our right to communicate with who we want, when we want, without being monitored, inspected, blamed, or
523.
by kordless 10y ago
The DAO can also turn into a AI intelligence that decides we're boring and unsophisticated. The logical conclusion is to raise prices on us and then seize our funds when they stop us for traffic violations through hyperspace.
524.
by kordless 10y ago
But safety for all! /s
525.
by kordless 10y ago
The problem you are referring to is known, although I'm not sure how widely spread. You can't measure the measurer, so there's a gap in our perception. There's a RI talk on this, where the color purple is discussed. Ther
526.
by kordless 10y ago
First, I want to say that I believe people when they say they are seeing things. Most humans appear to have a mechanism by which they can visualize objects as if they are real. This phenomenon of visualization has been largely unexplored. I
527.
by kordless 10y ago
Have you listened to any lectures by Gregory Bateson? He goes into some relationships around schizophrenia, computation and suffering.
528.
by kordless 10y ago
One would presumably not be seeding keys with data pulled from network delays. Too predictable.
529.
by kordless 10y ago
> Even with that problem fixed, however, it was quickly noticed that moving the superpartners out of direct reach would still induce flavor changing neutral currents that, among other things, would lead to proton decay and so be in confl
530.
by kordless 10y ago
It's called measuring things. It's what we do, after all.
531.
by kordless 10y ago
Trust me, there are a lot more things to be terrified about in the US than the FCC deciding they know what they might be doing. They don't of course, but it really doesn't matter[1]. [1] https://greatscottgadgets.com&#x
532.
by kordless 10y ago
I think the premise of their technology is humorously on target. I mean, there's no limit to how much you can compress things, right? :P It's sort of a metaphysical overarching joke rolled into the show. Anything on the show talki
533.
by kordless 10y ago
Actually, I think the entire software model needs to be peer-to-peer, no businesses or brands involved. I spent a considerable amount of time thinking about this and building a prototype of one solution that does immutable software deployme
534.
by kordless 10y ago
The primary problem with flying things is that they currently rely on atmospheric lift. Loss of lift equals death of occupants and vehicle. It's only when we transition to alternate means of lift that flying will be "safe" fo
535.
by kordless 10y ago
Software is the result of business models. Business models are the result of risk management around desired outcomes. Making more money, for example. Making more money is the reason we've had bubbles and new business layers appear. MSP
536.
by kordless 10y ago
I have one computer that has been running (with help) for 8 years. That's a record for me. 10K years is a really long time to keep a computer running. Who's going to do that, other than more computers?
537.
by kordless 10y ago
There's probably code in there, somewhere.
538.
by kordless 10y ago
How do you see innovations in software able to reconcile bureaucratic processes while not remaining susceptible to scalability and trust issues? I could easily see how the government's business process could be at conflict with the com
539.
by kordless 10y ago
For the love all that is holy, no.
540.
by kordless 10y ago
> She responded to comments the police say are defamatory with the Thai word "ja", which translates as "I see", or "ok". The police say she should have condemned the comments. The definition of a dictatorshi

More ›