koolala

33 ms·

691.
by koolala 2y ago
It does fit it. Perfectly. It's incredible. Like an Internet of all Human Knowledge released before 1965. OpenAI could of done this. The battle to me is just people respecting ideas instead of saying they are impossible or unnecessary
692.
by koolala 2y ago
Good-enough? Please please type out what a truely open source ai model with open weights and open data would be like. I picture it like a Tower of Babel! Very far from "Good-enough"!
693.
by koolala 2y ago
Ideals vs. Gut Instinct
694.
by koolala 2y ago
Look at Apple spending a billion on ads to say they respect your privacy or the Earth. Meta is buying / licensing a market sector in an industry they dominate where they have full control of our data. Our data is what got them that bil
695.
by koolala 2y ago
True? The cynicism is arguments over "true". If you trick yourself into believing this is what Open Source looks like (no source data) then you lose out on imagining what a real open source AI with open source data would be like.
696.
by koolala 2y ago
Can you imagine how incredible an open source model would be for research / humanity beyond the buisness needs right in front of us? Open-Knowledge source with an Open-Inteligence that can guide you through the entire massive digital l
697.
by koolala 2y ago
Model Weights are not the Source. Why can't that be obviously like a binary isn't source code - a binary is compiled from source. You can open-license the data in a binary so it can be reverse-engineered / modded but that doe
698.
by koolala 2y ago
"the first frontier-level open source AI" They are never going to stop saying this or show us the actual source data. Imagine if they did... Do they even entertain the idea? Can they really not imagine Open Source AI being possibl
699.
by koolala 2y ago
Trivial? ."the model is open source and the released weights are, well, open weight." I'm not sure why you don't want open source model data or think open source is trivial. This sentence makes no distinction or point.
700.
by koolala 2y ago
You don't want AI data to be open? You don't want massive libraries of open knowledge spanning all cultures accessible finally to anyone in the world in any language?
701.
by koolala 2y ago
Imagine an "Open Source" & "Open Weight" model that could give you a HTTP link to the source of any idea it knows directly from its public training database.
702.
by koolala 2y ago
"Open AI" started the corporate takeover "open" messaging and Meta ran with it.
703.
by koolala 2y ago
Please call it Open Weights and not Open Source. Open Souce AI will be nothing like Open Weight AI. Open Source AI will be able to reference and share its underlying truth data. Imagine an Open Source AI trained on all GPL code or a Public
704.
by koolala 2y ago
Sounds similar to UML: Unified Modeling Language diagrams. I wonder if TLA+ could convert to diagrams instead of Math notation.
705.
by koolala 2y ago
People talking about people is taboo to me. It's a very easy habbit to get into. I like seperating Ideas from People.
706.
by koolala 2y ago
People also like colloquially saying "The Square Root of -1". Technically wrong but personally meaningful. GA is mainstream once normal people start joking about the square root of zero. We need to imagine and teach even more imag
707.
by koolala 2y ago
1 + 1 didn't need rigor for years. then people did it in the Pricipia Mathematica and no one was happy. i + j is just as silly as 1 + 1.
708.
by koolala 2y ago
I'm ok with that if it means working with Pipes all day. Just needs affordable housing nearby... or my car...
709.
by koolala 2y ago
I'm glad you seem to know what I mean. I love imaginary numbers like the Square Root of -1 or the Square Root of 0. They can only be used like: nil²=0 i²=-1 j²=-1 And combining them into complex forms like: (i + j) (nil + i) What can I
710.
by koolala 2y ago
As this shows, ei and ej are imaginary numbers. This confusion is the biggest issue in GA to me. Typically Linear Algebra users don't use imaginary numbers either. It's all connected when doing geometry though and its pointless to
711.
by koolala 2y ago
How is complex / imaginary numbers not what they are doing? Numbers that square to -1, 0, and 1 are the bread and butter of the GA I know. Exploring different combinations of types of imaginary numbers and their products and space desc
712.
by koolala 2y ago
How can I get hired to do bioinformatics with pipes all day? Sounds like a dream. I have VR and control systems experience.
713.
by koolala 2y ago
What about Clifford algebras over the imaginaries? Is that included in your idea of reals?
714.
by koolala 2y ago
Mathematics and Namecalling is a major ego problem. I agree 100%.
715.
by koolala 2y ago
Pot. Kettles. Not-cracked but Blackened by hellfire.
716.
by koolala 2y ago
What's it even mean to use Imaginary Numbers or Quaternions "rigorously"? It's Geometry. The point is points, lines, applying transformations. If anything the field needs less rigor and more friendly intuition.
717.
by koolala 2y ago
This person is selling "rigor"...
718.
by koolala 2y ago
Squaring and Cubing should be geometric ideas - not just another way to do 1D multiplication. We need new operators for transforming a number into a higher dimention.
719.
by koolala 2y ago
:( no hope of scanning fiber displays ever i guess
720.
by koolala 2y ago
If Valve makes a Deckard Linux headset thats fun to dev for and achives a solid Linux VR experience it could change the field of computer science.

More ›