knocte

53 ms·

571.
How to Use Smuxi with Tor(smuxi.im)
1 points by knocte 11y ago|0 comments
572.
by knocte 11y ago
I don't imagine Satoshi bragging like this douche does.
573.
by knocte 11y ago
Nice! Immutability islands are the future.
574.
by knocte 11y ago
Or rather crypto-network-for-value-transfer, which is more correct and doesn't include law-jargon on it.
575.
by knocte 11y ago
He made a career out of playing. (Moral of the story.)
576.
by knocte 11y ago
> errors returned rather than thrown WHATT??? did they do the same mistake as Go?
577.
by knocte 11y ago
People generally think that landlords prefer renting via AirBNB instead of full-time renting because it provides more income. This is just one side of it. There are more advantages: - When the property is not rented, you can use it for your
578.
by knocte 11y ago
> AirBnB should implement the rule that you only get to list 1 rental. Disagree to an extent. If you have two extra bedrooms in your house besides your bedroom, you should be able to have 2 listings. The rule should be "only N listi
579.
by knocte 11y ago
Yes it disincentivizes that but it also penalizes people that need to rent their place to pay rent in a different place to where they bought the house originally (there are many reasons to not sell your house in this scenario).
580.
by knocte 11y ago
There you go, 75 days a year? That affects small-owners in the same way as multi-owners.
581.
by knocte 11y ago
IMHO all the regulation to be done against multi-property landlords should be created at the state-level, I mean, decoupled from any Airbnb-like infrastructure ("don't shoot the messenger!"). That is, the state has ultimately
582.
by knocte 11y ago
You're missing the point, BitcoinNG is not going to be an altcoin. You missed this paragraph from the article: "It is worth noting that there is no conflict or contradiction between NG and Blockstream’s sidechains; in fact, Blocks
583.
by knocte 11y ago
Exactly, good questions, that's what I was wondering as well! After looking around, I think this is complete bullshit. I mean, it's a normal website with a normal HTTP download. The only difference is that the payment method is Et
584.
by knocte 11y ago
ok, now we need spotify to make a move
585.
by knocte 11y ago
facepalm
586.
by knocte 11y ago
I think IronPython is the worst of both worlds to be honest.
587.
by knocte 11y ago
I really can't understand how Python and F# can be in the same role.
588.
by knocte 11y ago
>Very likely - but details/license TBA. >Yes, there will always be a free way of using Fuse and Uno. If I had to choose, I would release the whole platform (not only Uno and your libraries, but your whole toolkit/IDE) under
589.
by knocte 11y ago
Some brief questions: * Will you open-source Uno? * Will you have a freemium model? (Free for opensource apps.) * Will you change the name like others have suggested? * Will you consider a no-JS model to develop? If all of the answers are Y
590.
by knocte 11y ago
>maybe one day we'll have browsers that come with several languages' runtimes baked in More security attack vectors? No thanks.
591.
by knocte 11y ago
Well, the Python-to-JS conversion could happen in the server and then this problem would not be there (but then there would be no Python when viewing the source of the page, I know... which is... less fancy?).
592.
by knocte 11y ago
I see that to use Brighton you need to import a bryton.js file and call "bryton()" on the onload event of the <body> element, and this rings my bell: isn't this a downside compared to normal javascript code? Non-trivial
593.
by knocte 11y ago
With the 'what' of course I don't mean 'what happened', as the latter would be actually kind of the 'why' you're making the change. So with the 'what' I mean 'what is being changed&#x27
594.
by knocte 11y ago
As for me, I don't care about the style at all. What I care is about the content. And the thing I hate the most are commit messages that explain the what , but not the why ! (It's the equivalent to comments in the code that expl
595.
by knocte 11y ago
Is this going to be opensource?
596.
by knocte 11y ago
>Would it outrage you for someone else to take your code, put a pretty GUI on top, sell it, and make millions while you make nothing? If he does it with the same license as mine (i.e. GPL), then no, it wouldn't outrage me (I would e
597.
by knocte 11y ago
>Funnily, they sell it on eBay at a price higher than their exchange rate Doing the opposite of that would mean a man delivering letters with money in them with nothing in return. Sounds too philanthropic, especially when we're talk
598.
by knocte 12y ago
Exactly what does "proprietary company" mean? I think you're mixing terms. Proprietary is for software. And Microsoft releases both open source and proprietary software.
599.
TypeScript support in XamarinStudio and MonoDevelop(lastexitcode.com)
3 points by knocte 12y ago|0 comments
600.
by knocte 12y ago
Yes, especially for the IO code, which is C# code p/invoking into Windows kernel APIs. Mono project has been mainly pulling Microsoft's code that is managed, which is the one that should run in any OS unmodified.

More ›