kn8

12 ms·

61.
How to Transition Individual Contributors to Leadership Roles(humaans.io)
3 points by kn8 7y ago|0 comments
62.
People Talks: Remote with Andrew Gobran at Doist(humaans.io)
1 points by kn8 7y ago|0 comments
63.
by kn8 7y ago
The two drawbacks of module/nomodule that I don’t see being discussed often: - babel compiles async/await down to regenerator when using modules: true (at least for now) - the definition of “modern” browsers will change eventuall
64.
Kapitan adds support for Helm charts as input(kapitan.dev)
1 points by kn8 7y ago|0 comments
65.
Show HN: Healthier – style agnostic linter – a friendly companion to Prettier(github.com)
1 points by kn8 7y ago|0 comments
66.
Designing custom React hooks – sequencing of async effects(twitter.com)
1 points by kn8 7y ago|0 comments
67.
by kn8 7y ago
The privacy policy they used for App Store app can be found here: http://zap.jackmallers.com/privacy
68.
Announcing Zap iOS on the App Store(medium.com)
1 points by kn8 7y ago|1 comments
69.
An Overview of Feathers – An API Framework for Node.js(kn8.lt)
1 points by kn8 7y ago|0 comments
70.
by kn8 8y ago
Fathom - very simple, very pretty, great all in all Countly - a little richer, e.g. geo view Matomo - the most feature rich, closest to GA (haven't used)
71.
by kn8 8y ago
Because there's a barrier to entry with some of these "less ethical" tools, especially analytics, hard to compete with free or having to self host. We can/need to do better?
72.
Short Guide Comparing 2FA and Security Keys(twitter.com)
1 points by kn8 8y ago|0 comments
73.
by kn8 8y ago
And here's my write up of how you can quickly host your own instance of Fathom using dokku: https://www.kn8.lt/blog/hosting-your-own-analytics-with-fath...
74.
by kn8 8y ago
But why is nobody using that? Specifically, I would think 99% if stuff being shipped today is bundled with tools like webpack.
75.
Hosting your own analytics with Fathom(kn8.lt)
7 points by kn8 8y ago|0 comments
76.
by kn8 8y ago
Is the issue esoteric languages or just languages you don’t use? Which languages do you use?
77.
Great Divide in Front-End Development(css-tricks.com)
11 points by kn8 8y ago|0 comments
78.
by kn8 8y ago
Youtube?
79.
Decoding Zuck's doublespeak(twitter.com)
3 points by kn8 8y ago|1 comments
80.
Ghost Blogging Platform can now be used as a headless CMS(blog.ghost.org)
19 points by kn8 8y ago|7 comments
81.
Are New React APIs Replacing Redux?(medium.com)
2 points by kn8 8y ago|0 comments
82.
by kn8 8y ago
I'd say: - meant to be not React only - less opinionated in that it doesn't include jest - smaller in scope/code, so easier to understand what it does by reading the code (?) - allows extending configuration - focus on SPA us
83.
by kn8 8y ago
For a different definition of zero though. While webpack now does something useful with no configuration (which is great), you will most likely end up adding lots of configuration for any application. Whereas with jetpack there's a cha
84.
by kn8 8y ago
That's an interesting perspective. I'd add that one option in those situations could be to utilise Webpack plugins. In one project we were bundling JavaScript with webpack in a service behind an online IDE. We used a couple hand r
85.
by kn8 8y ago
Yeah, I mention it in the Comparison[1] section of the docs ;) [1] https://github.com/KidkArolis/jetpack/blob/master/docs/08-co...
86.
by kn8 8y ago
Yes, but it's a solid foundation that they all try to offer. Raising the bar for what you get from the tool by default, ideally without making assumptions that would exclude it from any use cases. I'd argue one of the reasons Next
87.
by kn8 8y ago
Thing is, in my experience, the configuration can get quickly very difficult when the plugins don't play nice. It's not just webpack's configuration, it's also babel and babel-loader and postcss and postcss-loader and so
88.
by kn8 8y ago
That's a fair point. I don't know what the best solution to this problem is, but I do think there's a problem. Requiring the users to install 20 or more dependencies (@babel/ , @postcss/ , webpack-*, etc.) and writ
89.
by kn8 8y ago
Same, the global pkgs I always have installed are: * nodemon * npm-check * ndb * serve * webtorrent-cli * jetpack
90.
by kn8 8y ago
Nah, I think installing locally is more common and often recommended. But I personally like the convenience of executing ad hoc bits of js on my laptop using `node` or `nodemon`. Why not the same for browser javascript? E.g. you could do so

More ›