klysm

54 ms·

1. 961.▲
   by klysm 3y ago

   Well if they’ve never lost an object then how would you go about doing that.
2. 962.▲
   by klysm 3y ago

   That’s one way to close out those tickets.
3. 963.▲
   by klysm 3y ago

   7.2 million dollars doesn’t hurt
4. 964.▲
   by klysm 3y ago

   You'd get more if you turned on JavaScript I think
5. 965.▲
   by klysm 3y ago

   Because I know exactly what the CLI commands do, the work anywhere on anybody’s machine, and I don’t know what a GUI is actually going to execute
6. 966.▲
   by klysm 3y ago

   Those are also viewed as high risk
7. 967.▲
   by klysm 3y ago

   Yes it’s different but conceptually similar in the sense of ambient execution context. I prefer implicit variables like scala has but it gets the job done in C#.
8. 968.▲
   by klysm 3y ago

   C# has the same thing and I use it for the exact same things
9. 969.▲
   by klysm 3y ago

   Definitely useful knowledge, but it sucks that’s what the world runs on in my opinion. It really does just need to be built from the ground up again
10. 970.▲
    by klysm 3y ago

    Even executables imo should be very thin wrappers around libraries
11. 971.▲
    by klysm 3y ago

    It’s amusing that this decision just accelerated that outcome
12. 972.▲
    by klysm 3y ago

    I didn’t have a very hard time kernels, but building the gnu toolchain is an absolute disaster
13. 973.▲
    by klysm 3y ago

    I had a terrible time with blazor. It’s semantics are clunky
14. 974.▲
    by klysm 3y ago

    I wouldn’t be surprised if we saw some leaks of weights
15. 975.▲
    by klysm 3y ago

    Wow what a mess
16. 976.▲
    by klysm 3y ago

    It sure as hell can be wasted though
17. 977.▲
    by klysm 3y ago

    This is a good idea for Postgres but only because of its specific semantics
18. 978.▲
    by klysm 3y ago

    This has happened to me several times on the internet and it’s a bizarre feeling. It’s weird to think about other people out there in the world living almost the same life trajectory as you
19. 979.▲
    by klysm 3y ago

    Strong doubt. The problem is LLMs don’t have a robust epistemology (they can’t), and are structurally unable to provide a basis over which they’ve “reasoned”.
20. 980.▲
    by klysm 3y ago

    I find I love the ideas of structure and routine, and fully grasp the importance of maintaining invariants and discipline, but utterly fail to apply those concepts to my life. Rather frustrating
21. 981.▲
    by klysm 3y ago

    Holy shit that is insanely good
22. 982.▲
    by klysm 3y ago

    Desolder the modem temporarily
23. 983.▲
    by klysm 3y ago

    I feel similar with the “every morning” stuff. The problem is I have a very hard time making some happen every morning.
24. 984.▲
    by klysm 3y ago

    Let’s be grateful it’s not high current
25. 985.▲
    by klysm 3y ago

    I’d be fascinated to read more about that second part
26. 986.▲
    by klysm 3y ago

    Whatever the answer is, unfortunately we have to regardless
27. 987.▲
    by klysm 3y ago

    Perhaps you are alluding to the connectors also having to be rated?
28. 988.▲
    by klysm 3y ago

    open and absolutely flooded with garbage
29. 989.▲
    by klysm 3y ago

    I'm very skeptical that's high quality for all use cases. Architecture is a huge trade off space and what's right for a particular product is most certainly wrong for another.
30. 990.▲
    by klysm 3y ago

    In practice though the factor of two can be relevant