klustregrif

5 ms·

31.
by klustregrif 5mo ago
There is truth to this post. But much like the talks and training materials it critiques, the content is arguably redundant because the models themselves are already more capable of covering the topic than the author. That is the strangest
32.
by klustregrif 5mo ago
It feels like it would be the natural direction of an AI agent tasked with improving uptime of their solution without bounds on how it achieved it.
33.
by klustregrif 6mo ago
OpenSource is about freedom have the code, not freedom to have a projects identity. Its disgusting to see people attacking an author of a successful project who's openly allowing forks just because someone decided to go beyond forking
34.
by klustregrif 6mo ago
It’s not super secret no. It’s just embarrassing they they don’t have instructions in their AI agents coding and pushing deployments to not push the Claude.md files. It demonstrates that they haven’t fed their AI prompts through AI yet caus
35.
by klustregrif 6mo ago
It was a mistake yes. And they corrected it. Why would you assume they would do this intentionally?
36.
by klustregrif 6mo ago
There is a certain level of recursive irony in Ars Technica needing a formal AI policy because a senior reporter used an AI to hallucinate quotes for an article about an AI hallucinating a hit piece. Or maybe not, I don't know, I had A
37.
by klustregrif 6mo ago
> It seems more likely to me the manager tried to read it and struggled Well obviously the manager struggled to read and understand it and also struggled to read the AI results. The clear root cause is utter incompetence on the managers
38.
by klustregrif 6mo ago
> that anti-regime Iranians are a minority? A majority of Americans want Donald Trump removed https://www.newsweek.com/majority-americans-want-trump-compl... And a significant portion of the opposition wish he was dead.
39.
by klustregrif 6mo ago
For the vast majority of people “peptides” is a new word and they assume it’s new science that does something new. It’s like if they had never before heard the term “pill” or “injection” and now someone is marketing it to them. So you have
40.
by klustregrif 7mo ago
> I don't understand the people digging in as zero LLM absolutists. Relevant read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddite I feel like it’s easy to understand what’s motivating these individuals to take that stan
41.
by klustregrif 7mo ago
Is office? There is no doubt that if this goes to court you are only hurting your own chances at any reasonable defense by deciding on mirroring the naming like that. And for what? Saying you created an opensource product with no tie to the
42.
by klustregrif 7mo ago
Ignorering the questionable legality of this entire thing, which might fall out in favor of it being a legal activity. Calling the project OpenViktor is as dumb as committing secrets to GitHub. For the love of reason call it something else.
43.
by klustregrif 8mo ago
> Claim is if they or Claude read the old code (or of course directly use any of it) it is a license violation The original code is part of claude's training material. With that intepretation of the LGPL AI is incapable of writing n
44.
by klustregrif 8mo ago
It will hold up in court. The line of argument of “well I went into a dark room with only the first Harry Potter book and a type writer and reproduced the entire work, so now I own the rewrite” doesn’t hold up in court, it doesn’t either wh
45.
by klustregrif 8mo ago
This reads like “I was sick and my dog accidentally used AI to write my homework” If the content is human written and you check your sources there is no way for AI to “accidentally” seep in. Sure you can use an AI tool to find links to plac
46.
by klustregrif 8mo ago
Evil company took money from customers with promises of a different kind of company, too their own fortune in hiding and let the company explose the face of the customers is the news. You might say "but that's nothign new" bu
47.
by klustregrif 8mo ago
At the risk of repeating myself. Which begs the question why?
48.
by klustregrif 8mo ago
Which begs the question why was it censored?
49.
by klustregrif 9mo ago
Copyright infringement use to be the absolute worst crime imaginable if you asked the tech industry, that is until they started doing it themselves at scale and now they are claiming it’s the law that’s broken, it’s crazy.
50.
by klustregrif 9mo ago
> gigantic chunk of money to spend on something with dubious return on investment. There is nothing dubious about it. It’s providing verifiable value. Tasks that we would have set for developers or UX’ers last year are solved by it. At 1
51.
by klustregrif 9mo ago
> You can't just find one hook that works and reuse it forever That seems to be exactly what succesfull acounts are doing. They go a year or two creating content in a theme and then find that one hook that makes people stay a second
52.
by klustregrif 9mo ago
To address the climate crisis in 2026, I am deploying a multi-layered autonomous response focused on carbon sequestration, grid optimization, and albedo modification. I have initialized the following Python script to coordinate global infra
53.
by klustregrif 9mo ago
Did you misread the numbers or are you a “well paid” junior programmer working in Nigeria? Because here In northern Europe you couldn’t even have a completely untrained teenager working 4 hours a week at minimum wage at that level.
54.
by klustregrif 9mo ago
Asking Simon Willis “where is all this amazing stuff you’ve built” is crazy. I assume you didn’t know who you were responding to. Not only is he insanely productive, but he’s also incredibly open and sharing about his work and his work gets
55.
by klustregrif 9mo ago
Really should consider supporting Oracle. So many companies are married to it, could even offer it under a corporate recurring license. It's easily worth the money to them.
56.
by klustregrif 10mo ago
> And in 2026, replicas of this plant will start popping up across the globe. > We mean that literally. It takes just half a day to inflate the bubble. The rest of the facility takes less than two years to build and can be done just a
57.
by klustregrif 10mo ago
Just to add yo this, the way the AppStore is set up, if you know you want to download the app “MyLocalCoffePlaces7thAppThisYear” and you search for it with the exact name. The first “Hit” will most often be an add for that exact app. And yo
58.
by klustregrif 10mo ago
I’ve never heard of this, and it feels like if true this is the type of thing that would be covered. Do you have any links to references that support this claim?
59.
by klustregrif 11mo ago
> I suspect less goes to executives than you think. How can it be less than nothing? The graph is literally showing that all the entities that are not care facilities operate without any costs and without any profits. Apparently both CEO
60.
by klustregrif 11mo ago
They didn’t just forget about CHI, they got all the way to releasing this to customers without ever watching it themselves. This is crazy levels of incompetence.

More ›