Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kllrnohj
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
17 ms
·
331.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
The Mac Pro is the only Apple system that has user-replaceable storage. The Mac Mini & Studio both feature slotted storage modules, but Apple firmware locks it and so it can't be replaced much less upgraded.
332.
▲
Answering What Is HDR
(android-developers.googleblog.com)
4 points
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
|
0 comments
333.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
Yes, it's an excellent laptop. But being good and being innovative are not the same thing. There's nothing innovative about the M1 lineup. It's better on the same axis that laptops have been improving at consistently. As
334.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
> For instance, the unified CPU and GPU memory Was already common and widespread with iGPUs in CPUs on x86, and was standard on all ARM mobile SoCs for a solid decade. AMD in particular had already done a bunch here with their APUs inclu
335.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
iPhone was a new UI focused around capacitive touchscreens which at the time was itself an entirely new category. What, exactly, did M1 change about anything about using a laptop? Longer battery life? Faster? Okay, same improvements as had
336.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
Surely you realized the "2" in Rosetta 2 isn't just quirky branding but because it's the second time they did that very thing? How was it a "big innovation"?
337.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
Apple Silicon either followed Microsoft's direction (who pushed for ARM laptops a solid 8 years before M1) or just did a better iteration than Intel at the same time Intel was struggling. Regardless of how you want to frame it, there c
338.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
Waiting until others struggle with early pains before swooping in with a polished version after the idea has been demonstrated is also Apple's consistent playbook. They've never been innovators, that's not their strength. The
339.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
Not if it's not crashing at all and is just a fundamental difference between Android's memory management and what the Debian guest is expecting (which is no RAM management at all)
340.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
> Switching away from the app can also mean it crashes. That sounds more like it's being killed for RAM reasons rather than "crashing"
341.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
> Microkernel vs monolithic kernel is more of a marketing rhetoric than technical differences. It's not, they have meanings and they can't just make up something different and pretend it's a microkernel when it isn't.
342.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
And yet https://developer.huawei.com/consumer/en/doc/harmonyos-guide... Looks shockingly similar to Android Studio including the exact same program layout on the filesystem and SDK compatibility selection. Ar
343.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
Harmony OS 1-4 were openly Android-based. It's Harmony OS 5 that supposedly is this new thing. Which did you use?
344.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
Anyone claiming to have made a microkernel, seemingly quickly, with Linux ABI and driver compatibility while supposedly being 10-20% faster would also be getting the same amount of skepticism. Especially if that was just one component of a
345.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
Wait, doesn't that also pretty obviously say it's not a microkernel at all? They use "class 1 mechanism-enforced isolation" which isn't address space space isolation per the paper, and thus they solved ipc performan
346.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
It's even harder to get an accurate picture of what Chinese companies are actually doing. Like the wiki page for Huawei's OS Next is pretty incredible. By which I mean, rather actually unbelievable. https://en.m.wikiped
347.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
> Just a single YouTube video in a single firefox tab will bring you up to at least 10W. 10W for video playback is a lot . 5w average for light workloads is not unrealistic... I think your perception of power consumption is a number of
348.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
If you can avoid eye rolling at the stupid name, the new Ryzen AI lineup (codename strix point) is really, really good. Very efficient.
349.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
My AMD Framework 13 running Fedora (an officially supported option: https://frame.work/linux ) also gets around that amount of battery life. And can run games surprisingly well.
350.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
> In Cyberpunk, you still have to wait around in elevators, which seem like diegetic loading screens. Cyberpunk has vanishingly few elevators. While it may be a loading hide in some spots, it's certainly not indicative of the game w
351.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
> I don't know what the author wants If only they had written an article about what they wanted... > but perhaps it's some kind of industry insider view similar to where "true artists' make movies that are so dark
352.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
> results is all Figma images gets exported as PNGs and bloat the website It's not just size but also decompression time. JPEG is way faster to decode which is also on the critical path towards time-to-display
353.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
> What kills performance are not memory copies, but locks. I'm pretty sure if every thread executing an LLM model had to have its own copy that that would murder performance more than any lock does, and it won't even be close.
354.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
This isn't arguing about exploit risks of the language but simply whether or not it meets the definition of memory safe. Go doesn't satisfy the definition, so it's not memory safe. It's quite black & white here. Nice
355.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
Critically to the authors point that type of data race does not result in UB and does not break the language and thus does not create any memory safety issues. Ergo, it's a memory safe language. Go (and previously Swift) fails at this.
356.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
> in this case, "memory safety", to describe the property of programming languages that don't admit to memory corruption vulnerabilities, such as [..] type confusions > The fact is that Go doesn't admit memory corr
357.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
And yet tech at large is determined to call LLMs "artificial intelligence"
358.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
Because Replit is a vibe coding product. It's all over their homepage. So of course the CEO is going to apologize when a companies primary product, used as advertised, destroys something.
359.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
> it looks like the momentum didn't die despite Google's apathy. Google is a founding organization of jpeg-xl and are a core part of the team. Chromium punted it, but Google as an organization hasn't exactly since they hav
360.
▲
by
kllrnohj
1y ago
SSDs are just limited write cycles whereas HDDs literally spin themselves to death. In a simple consumer NAS usage, like if this was just photo backup, that basically means SSDs will last forever. Meanwhile those HDDs start hitting borrowed
More ›