klibertp

32 ms·

361.
by klibertp 3y ago
> The Germans were forcefully re-educated after WW2, do you also disagree with that? No. But that wasn't under gunpoint, was it? The Allies left quickly, at least in the West, and local authorities enforced the re-education. Similar
362.
by klibertp 3y ago
> The russians have been oppressing and killing Ukrainians for over 300 years I know - and they did the same here, in Poland. We've lost our sovereignty, our culture was suppressed for centuries, and then we lost our elites in mass
363.
by klibertp 3y ago
Thanks. I was thinking more about the guy who actually put in the coordinates and pressed the button, and whether they were aware of what their action meant. I kind of forgot about the ones who gave the order and were aware of the whole p
364.
by klibertp 3y ago
> but out in the public, by regular units, on the streets and roads of cities and villages all across Europe. Interesting, I just posted a family story illustrating one of these crimes: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?i
365.
by klibertp 3y ago
> What do you mean by 'actual'? I mean the historical Nazis from WW2. Again: you admitted that not all Wehrmacht soldiers were evil, monsters, or even Nazis (other than nominally). But, in your words, all soldiers fighting fo
366.
by klibertp 3y ago
Somehow, not all soldiers fighting for Germany were monsters, but > russian soldiers are evil nazis, not normal people. Russian soldiers are. These are your words from upthread. Why is Russian army staffed by "evil nazis" exclu
367.
by klibertp 3y ago
> but because they want to and are encouraged to kill as many civillians as possible? How do you know that? Link please. > it won't convince you to stop supporting russia anyway. Exactly this. I'm saying that killing people
368.
by klibertp 3y ago
> Where did you get this unicorns pooping rainbows bullshit? It's called "humanism," and it's not bullshit. It mostly says that killing people is wrong. Of course, you think otherwise, so it might seem like bullshit t
369.
by klibertp 3y ago
> They are currently also bombing civilian areas, fully aware that they are civilian areas. They might be "fully aware" that those areas are used by the "enemy" to stockpile materiel and gather personnel. That would m
370.
by klibertp 3y ago
Don't bother. Seriously. You won't convince anyone irrational enough to generalize hundreds of thousands of people into "russian soldiers are evil nazis, not normal people" with rational arguments. The only way to convin
371.
by klibertp 3y ago
Very possible, yes: https://github.com/tumashu/vertico-posframe . You can position the box anywhere you want by configuring the parameter: vertico-posframe-poshandler . posframe-poshandler-frame-top-center
372.
by klibertp 3y ago
Tabs are built-in from a few versions, see https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Ta... > have the command bar/line/whatever it's called at the top I think what
373.
by klibertp 3y ago
Yeah, I like the conclusion from the article I linked: > Unlike claims by either keyboard or mouse advocates, when I do experiments myself, the results are mixed. Some tasks are substantially faster if I use the keyboard and some are sub
374.
by klibertp 3y ago
Oh, that looks lovely! I'll need to check them out. > Fully open source, the mouse (that I own) uses QMK for its firmware. Which means I can use key binding layers rather than single buttons. On this topic, I bought a System76 lapto
375.
by klibertp 3y ago
On this point, multiple cursors binding (C-S-<mouse-1> for me) is also useful sometimes.
376.
by klibertp 3y ago
Scrolling is indeed one of the things that both are and feel faster with the mouse. I also came to like docs popping up on mouse hover (in IDEA and with lsp-ui in Emacs), as well as "go to definition" on C-<mouse-1>. The con
377.
by klibertp 3y ago
Related: https://danluu.com/keyboard-v-mouse/ - "The widely cited studies on mouse vs. keyboard efficiency are completely bogus." EDIT: More on topic: I tried, but the percentage of times when my stroke wasn&
378.
by klibertp 3y ago
If English is not GP's first language, it's quite possible his mother tongue has precisely the opposite rules regarding capitalization, especially when writing to someone. While it wasn't hard to switch to capitalizing `I&#x2
379.
by klibertp 3y ago
Hmm, I'm intrigued. I looked at your blog - not very close, no time right now, but I feel I would enjoy a more thorough read - and I find, for example, this[1] post to be quite sensible on its surface, even if I may not agree with ever
380.
by klibertp 3y ago
Let me know when you can prove that "logical" and "intelligent" were ever stored on the same shelf, much less being meaningfully equivalent. If anything, we know that making a general intelligence (the only natural examp
381.
by klibertp 3y ago
I think binaries are refcounted and shared in Erlang? I'm not sure if this happens between schedulers/cores, though. They're also obviously immutable, so might not be what you mean by "sharing memory atomically". Ot
382.
by klibertp 3y ago
Hmm, that's sad. I guess the difference with Typed Racket is that the Racket devs and researchers behind it were all completely sold on the idea from day one, which resulted in a quick progress in annotating the whole of the stdlib. Wi
383.
by klibertp 3y ago
There's no Typed Clojure, still? I seem to remember people porting Typed Racket to Clojure; a quick search gives me core.typed[1] and typedclojure[2]. There's an example[3] looking like this: (t/ann hello-world-error [t
384.
by klibertp 3y ago
> Yes, as everyone knows, you are only entitled to an opinion about software if you are also a successful business entrepreneur without external funding. That's not it. I disagree with the GP, but they do have a point: coding for pa
385.
by klibertp 3y ago
No, the GP is correct: Erlang and Elixir are 100% equivalent on the BEAM, because Elixir compiles to Erlang AST, then that is compiled with Erlang compiler to BEAM bytecode. I honestly don't know what you mean by the React example, but
386.
by klibertp 3y ago
In the words of the author, C++ is ("arguably") less complex and easier to use than Rust[1]. The guy should have been here yesterday when Conan and C++ modules were discussed... But then he'd need to know at least a bit of C+
387.
by klibertp 3y ago
I think it's just the combination of a direct match in a subdomain name, the popular and widely linked to domain name, and lack of any other context in query. I don't remember whether DDG does anything to the scores it gets from B
388.
by klibertp 3y ago
No. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=kafka also mentions Apache Kafka before Franz's wiki page. DDG's very existence hinges on NOT profiling you, in any way.
389.
by klibertp 3y ago
It's not how the language "works", it's what the language offers. When all you have is a hash table, or when all you have is an object, you get to refer to keys and properties uniformly - because they are the same thing.
390.
by klibertp 3y ago
You can't confuse keys in a hash table with properties of objects. It's not confusing, it's a useful distinction. Most languages that have both objects and associative arrays (so not Lua or JavaScript) make this distinction.

More ›