kleer001

24 ms·

91.
by kleer001 3y ago
I found the code more reliable if I kept the function as atomic and low level as possible and to start a new chat if it got off the rails and loopy. I'd start with a better and more conscience queery to get a mlre thoughtful answer.
92.
by kleer001 3y ago
Not all IMHO. I think the next step is layering human choice in weights on yop of the already established models.
93.
by kleer001 3y ago
It's pretty shit and pretty expensive to learn how useless it is.
94.
by kleer001 3y ago
Not even close by several orders of magnitude across two dozen disciplines. But yea, we're heading there.
95.
by kleer001 3y ago
I doubt it. From what I understand the info that's out there already is more that enough to bootstrap useful human level intelligence. Anything people make in the near future isn't going to be that radically different. Sure there
96.
by kleer001 3y ago
How old are you?
97.
by kleer001 3y ago
Nope. Tried it more than a few times over my life. Maybe I never learned the "right" method. Always seemed like a waste of time compared to actively learning and internalizing useful intuitions about the world.
98.
by kleer001 3y ago
So, you've done this? Sounds like survivor bias. Doesn't seem like there's enough hours in the day. Care to site some examples with testimonies from kids that feel like they're getting enough attention and care from thei
99.
by kleer001 3y ago
> it's just Youtube videos No it's not. Khan A. has a huge structure associated with it. There's tracts. It's constantly growing and improving. There's assisting other students. Maybe it's not as intimate a
100.
by kleer001 3y ago
Creation and destruction are both very attractive. Maintenance is not.
101.
by kleer001 3y ago
Air conditioning retrofit for places that never needed it before
102.
by kleer001 3y ago
If I had had the will power at your age I would have built up my body. This and quality sleep feed everything else for the long haul.
103.
by kleer001 3y ago
I love the effort, and the package looks great. But it seems like a very early version and not yet ready for prime time. However, in a year I'm sure it'll be spontaneously demanding equal rights :)
104.
by kleer001 3y ago
> Have you ever struggled with loneliness? Yea. For a bit in my 20's and 30's. I think like most nerds. > If so, how did you cope with it? By distracting myself. So, not very well. But thankfully I'm more of an introve
105.
by kleer001 3y ago
I'm the opposite of what you're asking. I've been trained by dozens of years on dozens of systems to accept the BS that's built in as much as possible. The only thing I carry is my data (on dropbox, I know) and my begrud
106.
by kleer001 3y ago
Probably only two more papers down the line... maybe a year, maybe two. But like anything new it'll be expensive at first. My prediction is that within 20 years we'll be making full length high quality movies, automatically. Every
107.
by kleer001 3y ago
> Local LLMs are in production as the backbone of highly valued businesses. That surprises me. Would you be able to point some out to me? From what I've used of local LLMs they seem nearly unusable.
108.
by kleer001 3y ago
> That is pants on head ... entertaining I love these quirky working too hard for an iota of questionable gains. It warms my heart and soothes my soul. IMHO this kind of behaviour is going to be our saving grace when the aliens come and
109.
by kleer001 3y ago
From the limited amount I understand training an LLM solely on Wikipedia would lead to a lower quality model as there's parts of language and intelligent communication missing (but that's my intuition). Instead a LORA could be tra
110.
by kleer001 3y ago
Not me. But I do love that it can read and write to disk. That seems super fundamental to long term use. Naturally that's trivial to do with a vanilla ChatGPT api. But this is a bit "easier" .
111.
by kleer001 3y ago
No, the power and money to run high quality servers like ChatGPT4 and MidJourney or DallE. Sure there's local-able alternatives, but they're lower quality and lower bandwidth and not being used as a business proposition. Just like
112.
by kleer001 3y ago
>> i'm not sure why these projects are even really bothering trying to stop it. CYA aka https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cover_your_ass also it still requires tons of money to run, so it's likely only busi
113.
by kleer001 4y ago
Thank you. I could tell from the length of the post, didn't even have to read it, that OP needs a bit more grounding in real life and how trade-offs work.
114.
by kleer001 4y ago
For those who worry this is the end of safety for all mankind I'd like to point you towards this quote from the Victorian era "Rogues are very keen in their profession, and know already much more than we can teach them." Alfr
115.
by kleer001 4y ago
Not exactly the thing you're asking, but smoke detectors rely on radioactive material as do many medial imaging technologies. But yea, not nukes themselves, just the technology and innovations that they made along the way... were the r
116.
by kleer001 4y ago
My local city library Erowid.org
117.
by kleer001 4y ago
No no, just a fad. It's the same signal pulse as a dopamine spike, as a fad coming and going through a culture (think hula hoops or fidget spinners). Not that ChatGPT it's self is a fad, just the discussion here.
118.
by kleer001 4y ago
It's not exactly CAD, but it's motion graphics and cg: https://spline.design/ai I suspect someone else is working on the accuracy necessary for actual CAD work.
119.
by kleer001 4y ago
FP = Functional programming. Yea, everyone else probably knows that. But maybe I'm tired, but it took me a while to parse that.
120.
by kleer001 4y ago
I believe that humans, in general, will work towards their best interest and reduce their short term (if not long term) pain. Not all the time, not in everything. But, in the end, pain is not subjective. Sure, there's the myth of slow

More ›