kjrose

10 ms·

31.
by kjrose 5y ago
Weirdly the NFTs being forever is an argument in their favor. As hilarious as this whole charade is.
32.
by kjrose 5y ago
It felt like they were trying to double their keywords in a way that might feel natural?
33.
by kjrose 5y ago
How does this handle someone spending bitcoin outside of the virtual bank?
34.
by kjrose 5y ago
It's what I meant. The stop trying to overly polish something and just be honest with your goals. Turn off the "salesman autopilot" so to speak.
35.
by kjrose 5y ago
This has been my experience with so many entrepreneurs. They have these visions that are planned and structured and overly though out that they miss the primary pain point their business is trying to solve and lack the ability to pivot beca
36.
by kjrose 5y ago
I think I remember how this story ends... it isn't well.
37.
by kjrose 5y ago
I thought Facebook made some changes to prevent this after the last time someone demonstrated how easy it was... I guess those changes didn't work. Makes sense considering how you can pretty much uniquely identify anyone with a zip cod
38.
by kjrose 5y ago
So < 50% wow.
39.
by kjrose 5y ago
It's not a Ponzi. It's a speculative asset and one that people are buying hard into, some because they think they can avoid being the bigger sucker and some because they genuinely believe it will be useful in the future either as
40.
by kjrose 5y ago
If you could replace BGP globally instantly with no problems. What would you replace it with?
41.
by kjrose 5y ago
Doesn't the fallout from this like make it a bad thing to do though? They are pretty much attacking their biggest fans. I am pretty sure that's generally not a good idea from a marketing standpoint.
42.
by kjrose 5y ago
I did not know this. It makes a whole lot of sense and is totally reasonable. Does this mean that a graphics designer who buys a font can just use it at will without royalties as long as they don't distribute the file?
43.
by kjrose 5y ago
Is anyone here a lawyer who can explain why it's worth taking such a big publicity hit over this by Take-Two? Like it is clear these guys are not taking away any business from them, nor are they really losing any money. Is there some s
44.
by kjrose 5y ago
Nope
45.
by kjrose 5y ago
I really like the idea of automating these things, I am pretty sure I miss out on a ton of free deals and good opportunities to save money. However, the amount of trust I'd have to have in any system where they can scan all of my email
46.
by kjrose 5y ago
Ironically, I could see people actually paying for this service by splitting the "gift cards" etc. that are found. Essentially, it's an automated service to find all of the places where programs give you free stuff for little
47.
by kjrose 5y ago
I've been working on applications of network flow theory and ecological measures to macroeconomics to determine mesoeconomic scale measures for use by decision makers and businesses. These measures use certain properties to determine b
48.
by kjrose 5y ago
The question is how quickly can google and facebook lose their advertising monopoly by playing this game.
49.
by kjrose 5y ago
Facebook decided it wants to arbitrarily decide what is truth... before the science is actually settled. When you do this, this is what happens.
50.
by kjrose 5y ago
I'd anyone remains on freenode after this, they deserve whatever comes to them. Irc servers are not that hard to start up and libéra is already in place. It's a matter of time now before they lose most of the users.
51.
by kjrose 5y ago
Honestly, there's an pretty solid rule you don't crap on your channel owners by using chanserv. That's the number one way to be clear that having your channel on their server is fundamentally unsafe.
52.
by kjrose 5y ago
Well. That's a good sign that whoever bought out freenode has no comprehension of group psychology or the fact that this behavior is more likely to lead to people leaving very rapidly. Barbara Streisand syndrome anyone? It is so clear
53.
by kjrose 5y ago
There is a really good reason for this. Everyone wants the shock value for the easy publication but no one wants to do the work to validate the original study because that can imply possibly being wrong. This is a major issue with the curre
54.
by kjrose 5y ago
It means you invoice and they pay after 270 days of receiving the invoice. Basically the large oil firms know they hold all the cards so they regularly delay payment as long as possible.
55.
by kjrose 5y ago
I'd agree. But I would be surprised to see that level of action. At least for the next while. Considering the payment time on an invoice is averaging 270 days now. I would be surprised if they moved on this.
56.
by kjrose 5y ago
This was the error yeah.
57.
by kjrose 5y ago
From my experience. They will hire you but they won't pay your invoice until net-270
58.
by kjrose 5y ago
The fact this was paid off, and paid off so rapidly means that targeting major infrastructure for massive payoffs is going to become more and more prominent. The next time though, it'll be $50M. I work with people in the oil fields and
59.
by kjrose 5y ago
As a note, this doesn't seem to work with Brave. It only got one of the applications my machine has installed, and I don't have a slow machine nor a slow internet where I am. I'm a bit surprised it got even one of them though
60.
by kjrose 5y ago
Same here. You can absolutely fill up the board in a way where there's almost no problematic sections, and then suddenly it's like. ok, well, no lines for you. I got like 5 lines I think.

More ›