kirushik

12 ms·

91.
by kirushik 12y ago
Having ability to forward requests to an actual API of my service seems to be nice-to-have feature. (Especially for 5512 and 5513 ports, where actual correct 200 OK responses are expected.) Any plans on that?
92.
by kirushik 12y ago
What's the mathematical expectation of "Let's pay $300K for the security analysis?" –$300 000, and good publicity among security experts. What's the mathematical expectation of "Let's start a contest with
93.
by kirushik 12y ago
And even alias 'emacsclient -t' to 'vim' in shell, to keep one's existing habits of CLI editing.
94.
by kirushik 13y ago
It's opensourced under Apache 2.0 license. That means, it's free as in freedom, with all the legal ability to be forked and profited from. AFAIK, the only substantial difference between Apache 2.0 and GPLv3 is that APL2 is not cop
95.
by kirushik 13y ago
For sake of correctness — recent versions of Phantom.js are not dependent on Xvfb or any other variant of X, and there are grandmotherly prepared binary builds on the official website (kinda statically linked, so no dependency on WebKit as
96.
by kirushik 14y ago
Obviously, the next step is XMPP federation protocol support crippling in GTalk: https://www.fsf.org/blogs/sysadmin/google-backslides-on-fede...
97.
by kirushik 14y ago
More specifically, Google is forbidden to replace IETF-approved and wide-acknowledged API with its own proprietary substitute without being accused of being evil. Seems to be fair enough for me, just in case anyone cares.