Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kingdomcome50
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
61.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
What about just mapping it? That is, simply choose the smallest increment necessary for your system and _enumerate_ every value within a window as your source of truth. There is less than a million hours in 100 years. Is this system going t
62.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
I see this sentiment often. But is this comparison fair? For example, what does the distribution of risk look like in each cohort (AI vs human drivers)? Presumably the risk of an accident is relatively evenly distributed between all AI driv
63.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
The problem with creating a dichotomy between "monolith" and "microservices" is that... well... it doesn't make any sense. You describe your "microservices" and I'll explain how it's really just
64.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
> When you make a decision as a manager or a director, the impact of that decision has a multiplicative force. The above resonates as an exercise in tautology to me. If the job of a manager is defined as a position in which a person'
65.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
Here's to hoping its some kind of newt. It would basically name itself!
66.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
You should have included the very next sentence in my quote. There is a difference between using React and "SPA-izing" everything in sight. React is a library . It doesn't mandate an SPA as its use-case, and, frankly, I'
67.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
I agree that the cargo cult is real and abuse of the "SPA" paradigm has never been higher! But that is orthogonal to the tool. React does make front-end web dev not suck. It may not always be the right tool for end-users, but as
68.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
I'm curious about this. I have been using the same webpack.config.js file (save modifying paths) for nearly 3 years. I kid you not, yesterday, I finally decided to upgrade to the latest version of webpack because I am about to embark o
69.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
I see this sentiment often, that React is too complex, and I just don't understand that criticism. Is there some bloat? I'm sure. But the problems that React solves aren't trivial either. The signature of a React application
70.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
Sorry, the impetus of my comment above was that CRA is introducing FAR MORE configuration/dependency/complexity than maintaining a webpack.config.js file! The build process of a modern React application has a certain amount of nec
71.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
I'm rather convinced at this point that all of these people chanting "Can we just go back to traditional approaches!" have never built a web app of reasonable complexity, never used something like React, or have some sort of
72.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
Have you ever ejected a CRA? Your problems are just beginning once you've opened that can of worms. I used CRA exactly up until the point when I ejected it the first time. Never again. The sheer amount of code behind CRA is... rema
73.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
Have you ever ejected a CRA? If you think your problems are about to be solved after doing the above... I have a bridge to sell you.
74.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
Does this solve the problem though? I'll be honest, I'm not very familiar with Haskell (and frankly only casually use FP in general), but I don't see how the pattern in your link alleviates my concern. The problem (truly the
75.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
> In order to write that you have to pin a reference to the state Forgive my ignorance, but why is that the case? Isn't `state` being passed into the loop? Mutability is orthogonal to the question of where one defines a unit of beha
76.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
I understand what you are saying. I'm not sure how your points are at odds with the OOP counterpart I describe though. The essence of your response seems to be "because we want to use a pure FP paradigm" to which _I_ would ad
77.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
Okay. I don't want to go too far off topic here but the OP is about F# so I'm certain many enthusiasts will be here, and I have been waiting for this moment to get an answer to a very specific question regarding Elmish: What is th
78.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
> I have never had a static type checker (regardless of how sophisticated it is) help me prevent anything more than an obvious error (which should be caught in testing anyway). "I have never worked in a non-trivial system that chang
79.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
You are connecting unrelated dots. While it could be argued that the "cloud provider" space is an oligopoly (though I would not argue that), simply deciding to not serve a specific business, even as group, is not an antitrust is
80.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
So it's not possible. So what? What is your point? We are back to square one. What conclusion are you trying to draw from the fact you can't set up 500 servers in 24 hours? Are you trying to say it's unfair? I just don't
81.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
I wouldn't be so hasty to call a lack of variety a result of efficiency. Sure that may be one factor, but it isn't trivial to ship such perishables like fruits and vegetables half way around the globe in a way that consumers are w
82.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
Sure. Does AWS owe them the amount of time it should take to reorganize? Why? It's business. I just don't get your point. I certainly wouldn't choose to continue serving a client if I thought doing so was costing me money.
83.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
No. I can't figure out how that is relevant though. Or let me put it like this: What is the appropriate number of machines and amount of time? And why? If you want to draw a line, support it please!
84.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
What am I supposed to say? Amazon doesn't really come off as the "good guy" by admitting they have weighed the current political climate against their profits. Especially given whose about to be in charge. They made a busines
85.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
> If you don't like it, build your own competitor That is fundamental axiom of free-market capitalism. How do you think it is supposed to work? I'm trying to imagine a system where competition doesn't exist... oh wait. It&
86.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
I can't say for sure, but I think the point is to highlight some hypocrisy of the "free speech" argument. That is, if you claim censoring ISIS speech is okay but not Parler speech, then you must also be claiming that there is
87.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
A religion is similar to politics only in that they are both beliefs. Your argument is essentially that any belief could/should be protected. I don't think you mean that, so I urge you to try to come up with a more coherent fo
88.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
Humanity has yet to find a greater way to seek objective truth than the scientific method. This discussion started as an exploration of the claim that [all] religion is based on misinformation. And I can see, upon reading that word, how som
89.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
Sure we can move the goalposts. No, we did not mine for our own minerals. What is your point? If our company was unable to secure hardware it would have ceased to exist. A shame for the company, its employees, and clients, but that's b
90.
▲
by
kingdomcome50
6y ago
I've seen this sentiment before, and I can't figure out the logic. I used to work for a company that didn't make 300K a quarter and we managed our own boxes. Yes our scale and problem domain was about an order of magnitud
More ›