kidzik

6 ms·

31.
by kidzik 11y ago
https://deepart-io.s3.amazonaws.com/hi-res/leon3.jpg - hi-res version of the algorithm is ready. Soon we will make the second edition of the test, stay tuned.
32.
by kidzik 11y ago
Indeed. We haven't pass yet - that's the first attempt though. Still only 66% of human accuracy is quite remarkable.
33.
by kidzik 11y ago
Here are the results so far http://turing.deepart.io:3838/
34.
Leon Gatys in a hi-resolution deepart(deepart-io.s3.amazonaws.com)
3 points by kidzik 11y ago|0 comments
35.
Visual Turing Test by DeepArt(turing.deepart.io)
5 points by kidzik 11y ago|0 comments
36.
by kidzik 11y ago
I am sorry, I didn't mean any legal accusation - it just feels a little odd that the description of the app sounds as if you invented the technology without ever referring to the original work.
37.
by kidzik 11y ago
No nasty implications sounds fair to me. Good luck!
38.
by kidzik 11y ago
"Stiefvater [...] described it to me as 'black magic,' and doesn’t even fully understand how it works. He downloaded it from Github, where a computer programmer he’s never met posted it." https://www.washingto
39.
by kidzik 11y ago
Indeed, there is a bug in submission form. You can register with longer emails through the registration form. Thanks for reporting the error.
40.
by kidzik 11y ago
Thank you very much! As these are recent changes which we haven't tested live, your comments are very useful and we are actually implementing them now.
41.
by kidzik 11y ago
Given that we are discussing it in the comments of the app who just misappropriated the algorithm, I unfortunately have to refuse your request for the moment, sorry. We love open research and open source but there is always some risk involv
42.
by kidzik 11y ago
http://deepart.io/latest/
43.
by kidzik 11y ago
Definitely it all requires more explanation as we take it for granted but for users it is not clear what is happening Unfortunately "I want it now" is not possible for the moment as the computations are really heavy and there is a
44.
by kidzik 11y ago
Good point, thanks! We actually had one, but we removed it in the current version (it seemed natural for us but it obviously is not) - we will bring it back. We simply have limited resources for servers, but still want to provide the highes
45.
by kidzik 11y ago
And now at http://deepart.io/ we have hi-resolution and the authors of the algorithm on-board. Thanks for mentioning us :)