khazhoux

11 ms·

241.
by khazhoux 1y ago
In fact, it was a photograph she took 8 months earlier, and she didn't realize its significance or implication. If useful data is shelved, is it still useful? For Watson, the image corroborated the double-helix theory and caused them
242.
by khazhoux 1y ago
Agree 100% with premise of the article. I feel like the big secret of the recent advances in LLM tooling is that these are all just variations of “send a chat request and process the output.” Even Tool Calling is just wrapping one chat
243.
by khazhoux 1y ago
You must be thinking of the ones that didn't vote? Yeah, they don't count. (voting is how you get counted)
244.
by khazhoux 1y ago
Oh shit, the company that revolutionized AI didn’t pay their fair share of SF property taxes. Now I understand the outrage!
245.
by khazhoux 1y ago
What taxes did the non-profit skirt? All the sources I can find say that the revenue of ChatGPT was through the for-profit division, and that they’ve been paying taxes on all their revenue. Is there some other tax that they’ve avoided payin
246.
by khazhoux 1y ago
What taxes are they not paying? I am unable to find any concrete claim of specific tax avoidance. Only these exasperated “but taxes” comments.
247.
by khazhoux 1y ago
This is it exactly. Plus, why do people think OAI is still special? Facebook, Google, and many smaller companies are doing the exact same work developing models.
248.
by khazhoux 1y ago
Something not usually discussed is the different kinds of internal sensing: - Seeing images (what we usually talk about). Can you see your loved ones’ faces in your mind’s eye? Can you picture an elephant? Can you hold an image still or
249.
by khazhoux 1y ago
We all doof from time to time
250.
by khazhoux 1y ago
I’m friends with a Disney animator. I asked him, when you draw are you seeing the image in your mind? He was confused and said of course, he sees it very clearly, and his drawings are just laying down that image. He didn’t understand wha
251.
by khazhoux 1y ago
I’m aphantasic and can hear internal monologue just fine.
252.
by khazhoux 1y ago
What taxes did they not pay? Quick research suggests that they do pay taxes on revenue, and I can't find any articles that definitively show what taxes they avoided by having a non-profit arm.
253.
by khazhoux 1y ago
Did OpenAI take donations? I’m assuming that the “donors” Thiel, Musk, etc, did receive stock. Massive lawsuit otherwise. But did regular folks donate? Otherwise it seems people are outraged that their hypothetical donations were misus
254.
by khazhoux 1y ago
> The workers and supporters who were taken by this idealistic vision I haven’t heard from any of the workers. Why are people white-knighting for them? My hot take is that they don’t mind being able to afford a house (or more) for thei
255.
by khazhoux 1y ago
I don’t understand the animus towards OAI going public. ChatGPT undoubtedly changed the world. The non->for profit status of the company is not impacting anyone. It’s not like their success was made possible by being a non-profit. Sud
256.
by khazhoux 1y ago
What separates being out from being in? None of us can play the game yet.
257.
by khazhoux 1y ago
Dude, that's a lot of work. I don't think any of us can become the next Charlie Kirk just to ride a quick drift. It's gotta be more low-effort and high-confidence. I'm thinking more like: incorporate a company with a m
258.
by khazhoux 1y ago
Genuine question: If one wanted to get in on the Trump grift, and had no moral qualms, how would you do it? Can you come up with a realistic fast path to snag, say, $5 million within 2 years from Trumpland?
259.
by khazhoux 1y ago
Yes! This will be the time they finally push back on Trump.
260.
by khazhoux 1y ago
TLDR: yet another blogger demonstrating a complete lack of intellectual curiosity by completely dismissing an idea instead of exploring its potential. There is a lot to discuss about a browser that has an LLM with local, personalized memory
261.
by khazhoux 1y ago
Everyone here ragging on Wang but I can never figure out how some people grow the balls to work themselves into such high positions. Like, if I met with Zuck, I think he’d be unimpressed and bored within 2 minutes. Yet this guy (and other
262.
by khazhoux 1y ago
This is a powerful visual representation. I would suggest that the impact could be even stronger if you provided side-by-side images of 50 Cent, where the second is scaled up proportionately.
263.
by khazhoux 1y ago
How can I play starcraft 2 without it?
264.
by khazhoux 1y ago
Where do you see antisemitism?
265.
by khazhoux 1y ago
Are you saying you think everyone can see basically the same amount of imagery? I’m quite convinced it’s a real distinction. I have nearly zero visualization. The main thing for me is that I may get a fleeting glimpse of part of an image
266.
by khazhoux 1y ago
I don’t think anyone thinks it should be like photons. I think we all understand that internal visualization is something different.
267.
by khazhoux 1y ago
I can draw better than most people, but have nearly zero internal visualization. I learned to draw by direct observation, committing the patterns to memory, and repetition. As a result, I have excellent (if I do say so myself) drawings fro
268.
by khazhoux 1y ago
I think the debate (/question) is whether it is Israel’s goal to eliminate the entirety of the Palestinian people. That does not seem to be the case, which is where the “not genocide” argument comes from. Now I understand that the UN
269.
by khazhoux 1y ago
I can understand your skepticism, but this is an example of what is termed “normal human conversation,” where people share their personal experiences. Quite often, one will find people sharing stories without the backing of statistical evi
270.
by khazhoux 1y ago
You said the middle class is the most unreasonably confident group of people. I don't see anything to that effect in what you posted. Yes, I think it's just your made-up dismissive generalization.

More ›