Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
khazhoux
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
51 ms
·
961.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
I didn't even realize that. I buy mine online.
962.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
Why do you need to “renew” the prescription if your glasses give you 20/20 already?
963.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
You're wrong. Not a single piece of working software (literally zero) was shipped before Agile was invented 15 years ago.
964.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
> OKRs are a good thing Our company ditched OKRs and we are running much faster. It turned out that people already knew, at any given point in time and to 95% accuracy, what's the most critical work to focus on. We didn't ac
965.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
Moonlight Sonata is a good example of how you can be "brain-limited" in learning a piece, rather than limited by technique and finger dexterity. Moonlight is very easy on the fingers. But the constant variations are a challenge f
966.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
> 3. Leia went into outer space unconscious but magically flew back in without dying??? I didn't think she was fully unconscious. Also, "magically"? She used the Force. It's an energy field created by all living th
967.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
> But a familiarity with the structural conventions helps the listener contextualize the listening experience. If I listen to Mozart or Haydn, I should expect that I’m going to hear something in sonata form TBH I listened to (and attende
968.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
sorry, I thought you were commenting on the original article
969.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
"This thing that most people today don't like, they really might love it if they gave these a try."
970.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
> Music is not really a language, despite all the theoretical attempts I always liken it to a language, but not in any formal ("theoretical") way. Rather, in the sense of: it conveys meaning and emotion, but if you're not
971.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
> What does it mean to understand a piece of work? Do I have to read the sheet music? Do I need to know musical theory? Should I be familiar with the composer's background? The definition is somewhat vague. Oh no, I didn't mean
972.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
> The thing about classical music is that you have to understand the works in order to really enjoy them Very strong disagree that this is required. Proof: the millions of people who have enjoyed it for 200 years without knowing a cad
973.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
And how will you decode it?
974.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
Yes, and if you gzip it it's even smaller. But the big takeaway is that the amount of info that fully defines a human, is what we consider "not much data," even in its plainest encoding.
975.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
It's just about 3 gigabytes (each byte a letter). Pretty mind-blowing, if you ask me.
976.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
I tried implementing something like this over the summer but couldn't make progress with the 20-30 minimum response time for each OpenAI-generated block. From the demo video it looks like this runs pretty fast -- or does it?
977.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
But people will still argue over leveling, no?
978.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
> In a way, beekeeping is stealing nectar from wild bees. Congrats! You've independently discovered the plot of Bee Movie , spawner of one million memes.
979.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
Summary: * Lorne is racist because there's not more minorities * Lorne is sexist because some of the cast have been accused of harassment * Lorne should not just hire comedians he himself thinks are funny * Lorne is bad because too man
980.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
His voice is very personal and very unlike the standard writing on SNL. At first I couldn't figure out why he was cast. But once he started doing his material on Weekend Update about his own life, it was clear that he brought somethin
981.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
> To be clear, I have always sort of assumed that Lorne Michaels is a crazy asshole who I would not enjoy spending time with. However, my strong suspicion that he's also a savant at picking talent has been repeatedly reinforced by l
982.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
I’d love to see a similar analysis for non-founders. I.e., the other N-2 people at the startup. Like, how many hundred-millions or even billions will exit have to be before you get $500k as the Nth employee of a typical Series A/B&#x
983.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
The point of patents is quite literally that inventors get to control the production of their inventions.
984.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
Let's go deeper... Who remembers their favorite programs (source or binary), and (for bonus points) has a link? Disks can be found at: https://philreichert.org/book/fred-fish/listing-01.html h
985.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
They were perfect morsels of source code goodness
986.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
> "Every" is a pretty big word, and it's a pretty immature attitude to write off whole groups of people. "Every" usually doesn't literally mean "every", but I'm sorry that my experience across
987.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
I'm talking about sprints, as is Boodman in the tweet. And having some proximal observation of the Chrome team at work, btw, Boodman is spot-on that that team kicked ass because they had awesome engineers and super-technical leadership
988.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
Those sound exactly like the things any team would do on a new project, regardless of calling it Agile, Scrum, Kanban, or whatever. I just don't see any difference between this and just having the philosophy: "Do first things firs
989.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
What a bogus claim. No piece of working software of any merit was ever written before Agile! ... um, I joke, but this is the attitude I see from every proponent of agile. "How can a team possibly deliver a product on time without
990.
▲
by
khazhoux
3y ago
He didn't really. The SQL is right there, and this is important. What I've experienced (unfortunately) across multiple projects is that people who understand databases will write SQL with a nice collection of helper and wrapper f
More ›