Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
khafra
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
68 ms
·
751.
▲
by
khafra
15y ago
Recursively applying the "pay attention to the two levels above you" rule gets us to "the CEO sets the corporate culture."
752.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
There's nothing here that couldn't have been done before the Internet; but the instant ubiquity of such well-written final words seems to increase the emotional immediacy of it, for me. I was taken aback.
753.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
If you go deep enough, shallow-water blackout can happen on the way back up. I don't know what could go wrong just doing laps a few feet below the surface, though, unless he simply stayed under until he passed out.
754.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
A physics degree can get you a mid-six-figure job as a quant on Wall Street.
755.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
Just out of curiousity, what's the salary of a personal assistant who can both keep your schedule, and set up an EC2 instance?
756.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
It's disturbing how seldom local jurisdictions follow the MUTCD. Just in case one does, though, I'm sometimes tempted to pull over next to those black-hoses-across-the-roadway speed measurement devices and spoof a lot of extremely fast traf
757.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
http://www.gwern.net/Terrorism%20is%20not%20about%20Terror.h...
758.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
The Democratic People's Republic of Korea has a lot of artillery aimed at population centers of the Republic of Korea. But most HN readers do not spend significant amounts of time in population centers of the Republic of Korea.
759.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
I find two-wheeled conveyances more conducive to sudden insight than either ambulatory or four-wheeled methods of locomotion. My guess is that the greater portion of conscious attention required enables more subconscious creativity.
760.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
I don't think you can get around the nightingale-ish expected value of this strategy, no matter how you adjust the stakes and number of bets.
761.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
Obviously, they didn't try to patent the Chinese Remainder Theorem, or any other previously existing mathematical algorithm. But, as the top-level comment and the original post point out, > ...any method of manipulating information (i.e
762.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
The experience which is validated by many independent tests is the feeling of tapping into something truer and deeper. I don't think the GP is questioning the feeling, just the actual truer, deeperness of it.
763.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
Assuming such beings work on the same physics we do, they need massive amounts of energy to run a galactic civilization; and they have the same sources available that we do: Stars; and for extra credit black holes. Putting a dyson sphere ar
764.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
The mind-blowingly relevant picture: http://proto-knowledge.blogspot.com/2011/02/human-radio-bubb... Of course, light goes really, really fast compared to anything physics says we can possibly manage for things with more rest mass than ph
765.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
The reason it's "liar's poker," not "outright fraud," is that if someone calls your bluff, you lose that hand. The successful traders were just good or lucky enough to be able to bluff the entire market.
766.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
> 1. Person A has position X. > 2. Person B disregards certain key points of X and [...] > 3. Person B attacks position Y, concluding that X is false/incorrect/flawed. > Person A doesn't need to be present or even know that
767.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
In Germany, Zero-Energy Building is already popular: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-energy_building
768.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
When I think of Hungarian problem solving I think of Polya's renowned book on proof heuristics, "How to Solve It"[1]. How accurate is that impression? [1] http://www.math.utah.edu/~pa/math/polya.html
769.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
That's pretty cool. I can't wait to see it for sale on inventables.com or some similar site.
770.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
Producing a good "creative work" is a useful enough signal that it's not a practice likely to die out: http://sarkology.wordpress.com/2011/04/11/why-creative-domai...
771.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
In 99.9% of things someone might be asked to explain, it's noncontroversial that at the bottom level it all runs on physics. csomar is extending that well-warranted assumption to one of the places it's sometimes contested.
772.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
Is it costing you any midmorning mental energy not to have that initial dose of caffeine?
773.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
The article showed a postage stamp bearing Samuel Clemens' visage, but didn't include his relevant quote: "A classic is a book that everybody wants to have read, but nobody wants to read."
774.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
Too late to edit, but I just found a good reference: http://scienceblogs.com/mixingmemory/2006/11/the_illusion_of...
775.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
I have to say, he lost some credibility with me right there. I have trouble believing that anybody who watches TV really understands the concept of a busy schedule.
776.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
I'm saying "lift is just Newton's third law" is approximately as descriptive as "the mind is just the interaction of weighted electrochemical links between neurons." The word "just" covers a lot of detail that can make the short explanation
777.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
The movement of a fluid according to Newton's laws is described by the Navier-Stokes Equations, which have no closed-form solution[1]. So, if your intuition gives you a picture of air moving downward from a wing, that's great. But if it f
778.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
If you have a hill without anything breakable at the bottom of it, and a bike you don't mind breaking, try pushing the bike down the hill. I don't have any hills here in Florida, but I recall that working pretty well as a kid living in mor
779.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
Any mailing list I can get on for notifications about that? I'd be all about a seersucker short-sleeve button-down or something.
780.
▲
by
khafra
16y ago
...and here we have a nicely presented example of the practical difference between the purely kolmogorov complexity-based Solomonoff Induction[1], and in-principle computable measures like the speed prior[2]. The latter is, of course, unnec
More ›