kgwgk

7 ms·

61.
by kgwgk 4mo ago
> Immigrants can't vote on federal votations, dumbass. […] And naturalized immigrants can!
62.
by kgwgk 4mo ago
The vote was not about limiting citizenship. It was about limiting the number of residents - if anything the effect would have been to _reduce_ that permanent underclass with fewer rights.
63.
by kgwgk 4mo ago
That’s unrelated to the fact you reply to.
64.
by kgwgk 4mo ago
> How many of those were born in CH? About one third. That would bring the fraction of naturalised foreign-born citizens in line with the US (which is also a kind-of-hard place to get citizenship, that's true). > CH has mandatory
65.
by kgwgk 4mo ago
There are 40k naturalisations each year (a similar number relative to population as in the US). Around 13% of the Swiss citizens have acquired the nationality via naturalisation (8% in the US).
66.
by kgwgk 4mo ago
Maybe yours is not a large AI native workflow?
67.
by kgwgk 4mo ago
If you were just repeating the commenter’s point about « choosing to pay 10X to 20X because you trust AWS more than Anthropic » what was not the point?
68.
by kgwgk 4mo ago
What is the point then of a submission about how you will be required to share data with Anthropic? I’d say that the point is precisely that it’s an issue when you don’t trust them as much as Amazon.
69.
by kgwgk 4mo ago
> how to clean up old projects What’s “new” is indeed the “new” bit in cleaning up new projects.
70.
by kgwgk 4mo ago
You may not have heard of TIPS (Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities) but they give you certainty even if inflation is uncertain. Currently you get 2.75% yield in real terms for the 30 year maturity: https://www.cnbc.com/
71.
by kgwgk 4mo ago
Not great, not exactly what “completely insane and way higher than other countries” evokes either.
72.
by kgwgk 4mo ago
> would expect to see a withdrawal of funds from the market by anyone following equal weight funds Would you see funds reducing their equity exposure and going into cash or what? Which funds would do that? Trackers wouldn’t do that so wh
73.
by kgwgk 4mo ago
>> S&P 500 is not the most popular US equities benchmark for pension funds. Russell is the preferred provider > Where are you getting this from? At least it seems correct for a subset that may or may not be representative: “Thi
74.
by kgwgk 4mo ago
You say you didn’t see it happening and I’m asking what would you have seen if you had seen it. What would have been different? Where would have you seen this pretrading that you didn’t see? Who is that someone that would have been selling
75.
by kgwgk 4mo ago
It’s true that S&P 500 is not the most popular US equities benchmark for pension funds. Russell is the preferred provider - and they will include SpaceX 5 days after the IPO.
76.
by kgwgk 4mo ago
Again, what would it have looked like? What does “other components trade down in anticipation” mean when SPCX doesn’t even exist?
77.
by kgwgk 4mo ago
> The market, broadly, never priced in a rebalancing of the S&P 500 And if you had seen it what would have that pricing looked like?
78.
by kgwgk 5mo ago
Not sure about “dumber” - it may be better than SOTA models at identifying which days of the week contain the letter “d”.
79.
by kgwgk 5mo ago
> I don't see how you'd prevent general public from accessing bags. People are routinely prevented from being where they are not supposed to be. Whether you put the baggage pick-up point in a publicly accessible area or on a re
80.
by kgwgk 5mo ago
Yahoo is still around and kicking. Even Lycos' corpse is still warm.
81.
by kgwgk 5mo ago
https://www.fidelity.com/learning-center/investment-products...
82.
by kgwgk 5mo ago
> I still think I'd be using That's fine. Other people may not want to pay 300x more and will rather make do with last year's SOTA. > For coding you always want to go with the best model Maybe you meant "For coding
83.
by kgwgk 5mo ago
For coding like for everything else in life cost is a factor.
84.
Grok Build is now available in Beta for all SuperGrok and X Premium+ users(twitter.com)
3 points by kgwgk 5mo ago|0 comments
85.
by kgwgk 5mo ago
> Available now to all SuperGrok and X Premium Plus subscribers.
86.
by kgwgk 5mo ago
It doesn't. Your initial assumption that the heat capacity is a thing that doesn't depend on temperature did (because it may apply to ideal gases as opposed to water where it just doesn't stay constant as you noticed later).
87.
by kgwgk 5mo ago
The question was > Why would the amount of energy required to increase the temperature of a defined mass of water depend on the temperature? and the answer is that it does, except if you have a very restrictive model where it doesn'
88.
by kgwgk 5mo ago
No, it doesn't go against the idea of specific heat. You may be thinking of ideal gases and even then specific heat may or may not be constant: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_gas
89.
by kgwgk 5mo ago
Orwell had been dead for several years when a Catholic priest started those cooperatives.
90.
by kgwgk 5mo ago
> We can never know what the exact details If only there was some SEC filing available disclosing additional information about the 6-months $20bn bridge loan which was on the news four weeks ago…

More ›