keymone

66 ms·

691.
by keymone 7y ago
cash fuels orders of magnitude more illegal activities. It’s hypocritical to go after crypto to solve illegal activities problem when you havent solves them for cash or at least brought down to crypto levels. And lastly - “let’s ban bitcoin
692.
by keymone 7y ago
The question was if it’s possible to pay with cash for illegal products/services. You keep dodging and dancing around easy and obvious answer - of course yes! Now the question becomes - why is it so hard for you to admit that cash is b
693.
by keymone 7y ago
I can’t even.. First, whatever you’re wiring - isn’t cash pretty much by definition. Second - why is your default example of paying for illegal product/service is about somebody in a different country on an international sanctions
694.
by keymone 7y ago
Hamburg’s car plates all start with HH and nobody cares (or at least I didn’t find anybody who does).
695.
by keymone 7y ago
wait, what? can i not pay in cash for illegal product/service?
696.
by keymone 7y ago
solution: don't have assignment operator.
697.
by keymone 7y ago
yeah, fair point, maybe there's a better example, but i hope i've conveyed the idea: some zero values are not absence of values.
698.
by keymone 7y ago
0 does not indicate absence of value. Think of temperature - 0 is a valid temperature and is actually not equal to 0 when converted to Fahrenheit. It becomes incorrect to check presence of temperature by just relying on Boolean coercion, yo
699.
by keymone 7y ago
Syntax complexity is highly debatable topic. It involves complexity of parsing (by machine), reading and scanning(by human), conciseness, coherence of syntactic constructs and more things I don’t know. I wouldn’t say prolog based syntax is
700.
by keymone 7y ago
I just opened this page on safari and I see just “bleepingcomputer.com” with a lock icon. Its great chrome will do the same. Every browser should. Low level technical details and historical artifacts should go die in fire.
701.
by keymone 7y ago
Amazing analysis, only problem is n=1.
702.
by keymone 7y ago
> If ethno-nationalists are not allowed to make their political case with speech, what alternative would they have but violence? Plenty of nazi sites on the web where they make all sorts of “political cases”. Don’t confuse inability to m
703.
by keymone 7y ago
- inciting violence and/or hatred feel free to add more
704.
by keymone 7y ago
Good riddance. Everybody who willingly or not provides platform for hate speech is an accomplice. I hope to see the day they will be punished same as the guy that pulled the trigger.
705.
by keymone 7y ago
No, it’s literally true. For different people in different contexts “you’re an idiot” can be both offensive and not. Even Intention to offend doesn’t matter in the slightest. For instance if I don’t care about somebody’s opinion, his statem
706.
by keymone 7y ago
It’s in the article on a different site for ducks sake. Or do you expect every submission to be reviewed and fixed according to your joke sensitivity standards?
707.
by keymone 7y ago
Clickbait title. Fastest doing what ?
708.
by keymone 7y ago
My speculation is that there is a class of instruments that get prioritized depending on main pilot’s side. It’s easy to assume there is a valid reason for that (ability to override and whatnot). Why would a sensor of which there are two, f
709.
by keymone 7y ago
Yeah, I agree, it’s still arbitrary, just on different level.
710.
by keymone 7y ago
A tiny additional detail - sensor alternates not because of some arbitrary adhoc rule but because aircraft always uses sensor on main pilot’s side and main pilot’s seat alternates each flight. Still boggles my mind how utterly incompetent a
711.
by keymone 7y ago
To put things in perspective, a 10x10x10 meters cube is 1000 cubic meters. 22 of those cubes is what we’re talking about. It’s tiny .
712.
by keymone 7y ago
> instead of handing out next generation a warmed/messed up planet with dangerous levels of green house gases, we would be giving them a pile of dangerous radioactive waste several miles under the ground Without actual numbers this
713.
by keymone 7y ago
a) you're confusing addressing something with presenting the address; b) you're completely (possibly intentionally) ignoring the context, which is all about specifically "www" part, the trivial non informative part that
714.
by keymone 7y ago
> implementing what the standard says do show me the standard that regulates how browsers ought to display identity of the site. because everything you've said is irrelevant otherwise.
715.
by keymone 7y ago
> host name is not redundant information in context of browsing web sites in the browser, www is absolutely redundant information. > do the work of changing the relevant standards since you're so much into standards, there is no
716.
by keymone 7y ago
> How do you know which port is being used if you don't know the protocol by using the browser you opt into vieweing the web, which historically is used via http/https on ports 80/443, and just as historically, majority of
717.
by keymone 7y ago
> Browsers hide port 80 only for HTTP and port 443 only for HTTPS, because those are the well-known ports for those protocols how is that different from "browsers only hide www part of domain name because this is a well known histor
718.
by keymone 7y ago
it's a tax. as long as apple's walled garden is so much better than anything else - no reason to worry.
719.
by keymone 7y ago
could you elaborate please?
720.
by keymone 7y ago
> not for browsers to lie about it's just like your opinion man. not showing redundant information is good. if you disagree where's your rant about browsers lying about port 80 by not showing it? if your point is that www.name.

More ›