keybored

19 ms·

331.
by keybored 5mo ago
You shot off a one-sentence rejoinder about capitalists building a future. What does it mean? Not worth your time to explain, but worth your time to nuh-huh about your autor intent after the fact.
332.
by keybored 5mo ago
None of these X-for-agents seem to motivate why they don’t use X.
333.
by keybored 5mo ago
I can believe making hundreds of thousands of (Am.) dollars from your own work. I can believe making millions of dollars from your own work. I don’t believe that you can make billions of dollars from your own work. Instead you work yourself
334.
by keybored 5mo ago
> Not to scare anyone off these tools. I use them every day. I’ve shipped more in the last twelve months than in any previous twelve, and I think the people sitting this out are making a much bigger mistake than the people leaning in. Hu
335.
by keybored 5mo ago
Norway, Finland, the Baltics. If you’re talking about Russia.
336.
by keybored 5mo ago
> The NRA Foundation and the Heritage Foundation are also registered as 501(c)(3). Yeah, organizations like think tanks (Heritage Foundation) are supposed to influence policy/public thought/elite thought. That’s obviously not a
337.
by keybored 5mo ago
I don’t think I’m the naive one if you think those “hated capitalists” had the intention of building a bright future for the collective us.
338.
by keybored 5mo ago
I’ll ask my mother if I was dropped on the head as a child.
339.
by keybored 5mo ago
Do for-profits become altruistic when corporations get tax breaks? Edit: I’m replying to the “reasonable one” point.
340.
by keybored 5mo ago
Right. Finding the bug is in itself a win. It seems we’re jumping from that spend-electricity-to-find-bugs win to arguing about how some things around it are not quite good or comfy.
341.
by keybored 5mo ago
Assuming that non-profits are altruistic seems fallacious. Granted, I don’t know why they are assumed to be by some; it’s just presented as such because it seems obvious, no arguments need to be given. It’s clearly fallacious to assume that
342.
by keybored 5mo ago
I’ve never even met her.
343.
by keybored 5mo ago
So far I’ve indulged the complaining from OP in this subthread. Here’s a contrast. I have always hated environmentalism that is solely about individual, piecemeal work. A cause that correctly identifies the political problem is exactly so
344.
by keybored 5mo ago
Then we must build our own future. One where we deny the capitalists access to their own automated killer robot armies.
345.
by keybored 5mo ago
Whatever the play here they can’t be angling for any external PR or internal morale boost. What if they wrote: “This is a tough economy and we have to tighten our belts.” Maybe that’s naive of me. Bad signal to investors as opposed to insig
346.
by keybored 5mo ago
Two days ago: “Today I've made the difficult decision to reduce the size of Coinbase by ~14%” (layoffs) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48021368
347.
by keybored 5mo ago
I only skimmed this. Lots of “not to be read , but to be verified ; process , not the artifact; not x but...”. “AI-checks-AI pipelines as first-class CI infrastructure, not bolt-on curiosity”—what’s the contrast here? Is it serious aspi
348.
by keybored 5mo ago
> into something trivial that no one would disagree with. Start a topic on democracy here and at least a handful will argue against regular people governing society and their own lives. That’s more than no-one.
349.
by keybored 5mo ago
People balk at this not being an independent cause. Yet I’m skeptical. Imagine this permaculture computing thing in an alternative reality. Very environmentally friendly—but very narrowly about computers. It has nothing to say about the usu
350.
by keybored 5mo ago
> Using your own final example: could you not argue that if you trim the edges every day to fight weeds (read: practice permacomputing as a daily lifestyle), then over time the weeds may never grow to their fullest extent? There are two
351.
by keybored 5mo ago
I understand. :) Sorry about the sour response.
352.
by keybored 5mo ago
Don’t insult me.
353.
by keybored 5mo ago
This by itself looks like a popular topic here (judging by the votes to comment ratio). But as is expected the topic gets derailed because people would like resilience, mindful use, and ecological care truly by themselves , not within a pa
354.
by keybored 5mo ago
Doesn’t even apply unless someone says that (1) there are too many “standards”, and (2) so we are making this standard (neither apply here). Someone made something. We should really consider eventually retiring memes because they just end u
355.
by keybored 5mo ago
Imagine you start on a trek to find the sage with the answer to why idiot sociopaths rule everything, why wars that don’t even benefit the aggressor are started, why there is enough food for everyone twice over but people are still starving
356.
by keybored 5mo ago
It can be fruitful to consider the potential negative ramifications of one’s work for once. Especially so when the program is busy anyway.
357.
by keybored 5mo ago
Just look at what they write. There is a correlation between the Agentic Multitasker and the type of person who wanted results and didn’t care about the coding in itself. That’s what they themselves keep writing. They are not the same peopl
358.
by keybored 5mo ago
Okay I don’t believe in the strictly-speaking idea of a soul with an afterlife yadda yadda for any entity at all. I should have said consciousness.
359.
by keybored 5mo ago
This is real. You are not imagining it. Oh sorry. I cribbed that from the article itself. > > This is real. You are not imagining it.
360.
by keybored 5mo ago
What income brackets correlate with having a PhD? Is it mostly underpaid teachers, overqualified service workers, or something else? I don’t know the answer.

More ›