Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ketralnis
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
91.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
and if you never end the block everything you do is safe from now on. Judges don't want you to know this one weird trick
92.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
I was reminded by another post on HN today: RAD - Rapid Application Development. Newer "no/low code" systems pale in comparison to what novices used to be able to do with Visual Basic or Hypercard or even old PHP. I was one o
93.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
I wouldn't go so far as "use re2 instead" of re for everything as a superstitious "X tool is objectively better than Y tool" but if you're performance bound on regexes definitely do look at re2. For context on
94.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
That's needlessly defeatist and "it's so bad out there there's no point in trying" is a thought terminating cliché. We can and should improve development practises, mitigate vulnerabities (ASLR, WAFs, etc), isolate
95.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
None of that is my problem. My belongings belong to me. I don't care if a bean counter somewhere was slightly happier about it before it got to me. The moment the car is my car, it's no longer their car to start charging me access
96.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
In either of these cases the car you exchanged your money for physically had the seat heaters in it already. You were buying (or renting) the password to be allowed to use your own belongings. To me this isn't nuanced at all. It's
97.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
IMO "you can turn that off" is absolutely not an acceptable answer to this stuff. It's my computer and it shouldn't be doing anything that I didn't specifically tell it to do. And that's not even to mention how
98.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
I practised picking locks on your house and broke the lock because of a poor lock design. Yeah okay the lock sucks. But I probably shouldn't have been doing it on your house in the first place and now you've got a broken lock. Who
99.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
Pretty much every invasive thing starts out as a more acceptable less invasive and is stepped up one thing at a time. "Oh okay it's just non-citizens" "oh okay it's just criminals" "oh okay it's just
100.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
There's pretty much never a "why". Fashion is fashion. You can look back at some things that occured and say "well it's because it's easy" or whatever, but to be rigourous you'd have to also apply tha
101.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
Alright. Sounds like it's not for you then. That's okay. I don't know what you want us to say here. If you don't like it then you don't like it. No skin off of anybody's teeth if egypturnash isn't convince
102.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
Sadly the days of "keep using the software" are mostly over. Between security updates and platforms frequently making backwards-incompatible changes you'll hit the wall eventually. The rest of the world has opted into the con
103.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
Not a physicist but basically yes. Most quantum mechanics calculations involve the path integral[0], a sort of sum of all possible Feynman diagrams[1] that an interaction could involve and the more of these you involve the more accurate you
104.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
good thinking I definitely need this useful and widely used code to be legible and platform independent
105.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
"People say otherwise" because it's not true. I run my own email and I do just fine. The last blacklist I had was from Hotmail about five years ago
106.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
What’s wrong with it? Not enough json kubernetes mongo rust npm AI cloud react? Or is “old” just the same as “bad”? Sadly “move on” today means moving to a single vendor’s walled garden. We don’t really have truly federated protocols anymor
107.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
> idk what they'd have to do to make me move over, but man, it'd have to be demonstrably valuable - not just the same thing but different 3 feet over that way. - Since Apple is currently charging 30%, another app store might ch
108.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
Since forever? It turns out that more than one thing can be bad
109.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
They also run the local government and ban any other malls from existing. Nothing could be more rent-seeking.
110.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
like every "well technically" you should read it is "not really"
111.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
For iOS maybe. Most of those applications are also using Apple's networking libraries and are effectively required to be on Apple's infinite software update treadmill to continue to be listed, keeping them young and hip in perpetu
112.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
> Customers who don't pay extra are getting less service than they used to for the same money they used to pay Sure, yeah. That's how price increases work. Nobody's arguing that it's not a price increase. But if your
113.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
I don't think either of those is true? It's not hidden, they put it right up on their blog https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/new-aws-public-ipv4-address... the opening line of which is "We are introd
114.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
Why do they blur the keyboard in every photo? So strange
115.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
I'd guess using uuids for the keys instead of ROWIDs might help. I'd also guess that UNIQUE constraints must also trigger a conflict and that "close together" in index btrees also does. If that's true then using a u
116.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
Communism, Marxism, Fascism, and other "everything I don't like is ____" names aren't the same thing as totalitarianism. You can tell because this is a right-wing government trying to do this while Communism and Marxism
117.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
Same, I take all of my coins to the grocery store and dump them in before finishing off whatever's left with my card. It takes some time to get the machine to take them all so I don't do it if there's a queue behind me but ot
118.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
They didn't say it was an intentional backdoor. But if it were, the result would be the same. It's hard to secure encryption keys. If you had a backdoor based on a key that you had to keep secret, leaks like these can happen. If M
119.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
Prenups can say (almost) whatever you want, so the short answer is to cover maintenance expenses in the same document that gives you a stake in the property in the first place even if that stake is just a residence one. Of course that'
120.
▲
by
ketralnis
3y ago
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=uphill+both+ways
More ›