kephasp

7 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by kephasp 4y ago

   Why would it be hard to prove that functional code is actually runnable?
2. 32.▲
   by kephasp 4y ago

   > Immutability is great but everything-is-recursion is not. Why oppose a real pattern and a imaginary one?
3. 33.▲
   by kephasp 4y ago

   You may find it interesting to study FP a bit more, because recursion, when understood, is pretty universally felt as way more readable than its imperative alternatives. I also usually find currying extremely practical and easier for me whe
4. 34.▲
   by kephasp 4y ago

   I'd ask the opposite question: why would you use a dangerous paradigm when a safe one exists and the dangerous one doesn't offer much benefit?
5. 35.▲
   by kephasp 4y ago

   Is there data supporting the notion that immutable structures are slower? There are many cases where there won't be a single difference in performance and there are a bunch of cases where immutable structures will be way faster than mu
6. 36.▲
   by kephasp 5y ago

   ES is always a technical trick. It's a way to store data, it's unrelated to the business domain…
7. 37.▲
   by kephasp 5y ago

   If the ES is "unnecessary", then it's not ES by definition. If events are not your source of truth, it's not event sourcing , just event logging.
8. 38.▲
   by kephasp 7y ago

   It's ironic that the post would say security is a PL issue, but not adress capability-safe PLs like E, Pony or Caja…