Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kens
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
35 ms
·
601.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
The terminology is a bit of a mess, but usually a PLA is highly structured with an AND plane and an OR plane, so it implements sum-of-products logic. A gate array is more general, with arbitrary connections.
602.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
Knuth's famous paper "The Complexity of Songs" (1977) deserves a mention. He describes how most songs of length n require a text of length proportional to n. But he goes on to prove the complexity of Old MacDonald had a farm
603.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
I'm not sure what you're asking. IDT used the same gate array for numerous 7400-series products. As a result, simple chips would waste most of the die, while complex chips would use most of it. The tradeoff is that using a gate ar
604.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
Yes, a ULA is another name for a gate array. A while ago I bought an 8086 chip on eBay that turned out to be a random ULA chip that was re-labeled: https://www.righto.com/2020/08/inside-counterfeit-8086-proce...
605.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
Author here if there are any questions...
606.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
Thanks!
607.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
> I think it's grossly disingenuous to say "computing market" and then ignore the entire smartphone/tablet market. Note the presence of the sentence: "Of course, mobile phones are almost entirely ARM."
608.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
According to Dave Bradley, one of the creators of the IBM PC, "We chose the 8088 [over the 8086] because of its 8-bit data bus. The smaller bus saved money in the areas of RAM, ROM, and logic for the simple system." Another thing
609.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
Neat! Eventually, Intel added the CPUID instruction so you could determine the processor type without trickery.
610.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
Author here for your 8086/8088 questions...
611.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
I reverse-engineered the HN ranking algorithm a few years ago [1]. To answer your question, posts have a sudden drop due to several types of penalties. Many posts are penalized from the start due to their title or domain. A "controvers
612.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
The explanation for why they chose this printer is in a conference paper published in the National Telesystem Conference, 1982. Unfortunately, I can't find these conference proceedings anywhere (even in physical form). If anyone happen
613.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
I answered that question elsewhere in this thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39768125
614.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
As far as cryptography, the military AN-UGC/74 teleprinter worked with cryptographic equipment such as TSEC/KG-30, KG-84, KW-7, and KY-57 [1]. You'd send the data stream into the crypto equipment and then to the teleprinter.
615.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
You don't need to speculate. As I explained in the thread, the Shuttle teleprinter was based on the military AN/UGC-74 teleprinter but had many modifications including new three circuit boards for the FSK decoding.
616.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
Serious answer: I post things on Twitter because it is easy, lets a huge number of people read my thread, and provides easy interaction. I post the same threads to Mastodon and get orders of magnitude less interest. I also write blog posts,
617.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
Three ways you can read the thread: a) Log into Twitter. b) Read the same thread on Mastodon [1]. c) Wait until I turn it into a blog post. [1] https://oldbytes.space/@kenshirriff/112124283096167861
618.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
To clarify, that is an emulator specific for the IBM 360/50 that runs the microcode. It is a demo, not a useful system. It has nothing to do with Hercules.
619.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
Curiously, early Intel 386 processors had a bug where 32-bit multiplies were genuinely nondeterministic: some answers would depend on the voltage, frequency, temperature, and manufacturing conditions. The problem was essentially analog, a l
620.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
I'm confused by one statement in the article: "Lockheed turned the Hiller Helicopter plant in East Palo Alto into the control facility for all spy satellites". Presumably the control facility was the Blue Cube (later Onizuka
621.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
Author here for your vintage computer questions :-)
622.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
An APL keyboard typically wasn't exactly a custom keyboard, but a standard keyboard with APL characters accessible through modifier keys. Often there were adhesive labels on the front of each key showing the special characters or you c
623.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
I'm not familiar with that. But if you can't build them with modern technology, 1950s technology wouldn't work either.
624.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
Author here for all your electromechanical computer questions :-)
625.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
Author here for any analog computer questions...
626.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
That history is a bit muddled so let me clarify. I'm a big fan of Federico Faggin, but Stan Mazor, Ted Hoff, and Masatoshi Shima are also co-inventors of the 4004. Next, the 4004 had approximately nothing to do with later processors in
627.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
> Does 99.995% [1] of hackernews sound reasonable enough to you? How did you come up with that number? I looked at the link and just one of the outages listed on January 10 was 59 minutes. That alone makes the uptime worse than 99.99% fo
628.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
No, eight nines is 316 milliseconds of downtime per year. 30 seconds of downtime a year is six nines. (I spent a long time working on high availability at Sun, so the numbers immediately looked wrong.) https://en.wikipedia.org&#x
629.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
I investigated 132 columns in detail and wrote a blog post about it. It's complicated but essentially, 14 7/8" paper was a standard size going back to the IBM 402 tabulator in 1948, where it was used for 88-column output usin
630.
▲
by
kens
3y ago
The original definitions of "hard error" and "soft error" were for disks and go back to the early 1970s at least. A soft error was a recoverable error that could be handled by re-reading the disk sector. A hard error was
More ›