Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kelnos
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
39 ms
·
811.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
If it was included unintentionally, then it's a leak.
812.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
I always write code like that. I don't like early returns. This approximates `if` statements being an expression that returns something.
813.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
Oh god, I was so close to believing Malus was a real product and not satire.
814.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
So it's true that the several of the top topmost comments are anti-MS or at least worried, but there are plenty of replies to those that are defending MS. A few of them: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17229625
815.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
I've had so many discussions with friends over the past 15 or so years where they've praised Microsoft and their embracing of open source, and have given me a hard time for continuing to distrust them. To be fair, I was a teenage
816.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
It's also unclear if it's the laws alone that saved those 57 kids. If the laws didn't exist, presumably some of those 57 kids would still have been in rear-facing child seats, and would have survived, no? (Unless their
817.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
> I cannot imagine deciding to give up a child because of a minor inconvenience like this. I don't think the article was suggesting that parents sit down together, ask each other "hey, should we have a third kid?" and on
818.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
I've never had a car where you could disable the passenger-side airbag. We did have a car like that in the 90s, but it didn't come that way from the factory: my mother had a mostly-irrational fear of them (she was on the shorte
819.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
You're not really arguing against the paper; the study showed a lower birth probability of only 0.73% in places with car seat laws. That suggests that yes, sometimes it does deter parents from having a third kid, but most of the time
820.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
It depends on how many kids you have, no? I did know other kids when I was growing up who shared a room with one or more siblings, but some parents want to be able to give each child their own bedroom. So a three-bedroom apartment might no
821.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
That... doesn't make any sense.
822.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
> There were 9 crewed missions and 1 almost killed its crew (I will omit Apollo 1 for now). I could argue that Apollo had a 1 in 20 chance of killing a crew. That's not how risk analysis works. Let's say every Apollo mission
823.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
The "watchlist" made me a bit uncomfortable. I get that it's satire, but putting real people's names in a list of people you're (even jokingly) watching for fraud, and assigning a "risk factor" to them (e
824.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
I think in the US we already have that; it's just that our current leadership is in love with oil and gas and thinks renewables are "woke" or something. The number of renewable energy projects that have been cancelled or sta
825.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
https://xcancel.com/LeoLabs_Space/status/2038680177408880719
826.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
> A big reason we invest in this is because we want to keep free and logged-out access available for more users. Are these checks disabled for logged-in, paid users?
827.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
> The unsafe versions of these things literally throw out history and replace it with a fiction that whoever did the final operation wrote everything, or that the original author wrote something possibly very divergent from what they ac
828.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
> Does NeoVim support Claude Code? Why does it need to? Just open CC in another terminal window or tab. Or run it in a split inside vim, using `:term`.
829.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
I just have vim open in one terminal tab and Claude Code open in another terminal tab. Works great.
830.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
I would say yes, that's a good way to make the distinction. It's even more than that: the feed is different for every single user. With a site like HN, everyone sees the same front page at a given time. What makes it to the fron
831.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
Agreed. There are lots of people posting shitty things on Facebook, Twitter, etc., but on LinkedIn, everyone is so fake . They're putting their best professional face on, heavily self-censoring themselves, and their content plays to
832.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
> It's more than just procedure or habit, your hands feel dirty and you want to wash that off. I'm not sure that's reliable across people. I'm definitely like that; whenever my hands feel the least bit dirty or oil
833.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
Even if you don't care about humanitarian causes, all of this stuff that's been axed directly contributed to US soft power, globally. That's all in the past now, though, and the US is declining as a global power as a resul
834.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
I assume you're being sarcastic, but you're essentially right. There's no such thing as natural rights or universal law. We only have what the people in power grant us. That's been the case for what I assume is the en
835.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
> Just because I think that no country should meddle in another's affair A random person wanting to cross the border to attend a protest is not a "country meddling in another's affairs". It's an individual wan
836.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
Right, hence the toplevel commenter's bit about "it usually signals the start of the kleptocrat activities."
837.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
> If your bonus is calculated as min(0, percentage profit_generated)* I assume you meant `max(...)`? Otherwise you will at best get zero dollars in bonus, and at worst owe your employer money. ;) (I get min/max backward all the
838.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
I wonder if that person might find it amusing to take down the file the app uses
839.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
> Bit by bit, Apple is loosing it's Desktop position. Apple never really had much of a desktop position to start with. And their desktop position has always been a higher share than Linux, so I don't really see how this chang
840.
▲
by
kelnos
7mo ago
Isn't it just DHS that's shut down? Presumably the people you were talking to are at the IRS, and they're still getting paid.
More ›