kelnos

18 ms·

361.
by kelnos 5mo ago
Good luck only working 36 hours a week at that kind of job, though.
362.
by kelnos 5mo ago
That's incredibly scummy. Article author estimates that "only" 5% of people would expect this outcome for a "try for free", "no credit card required" service, but I think that number is well below 1%. Can
363.
by kelnos 5mo ago
> Firefox will also disable V2 sooner or later. Got a source for that, or is that just unfounded speculation?
364.
by kelnos 5mo ago
I think they mean racial/ethnic.
365.
by kelnos 5mo ago
> They have. It's called insurance. In other words, economists haven't solved the problem. Insurance just kicks the can down the road. > You could also just require a license to scrap copper. That doesn't work. Th
366.
by kelnos 5mo ago
The data doesn't agree with you, as others in this subthread have noted with references.
367.
by kelnos 5mo ago
Both things can be true, that Japan's criminal justice system is awful, and that Japanese people have a strong culture of respect for the commons and community.
368.
by kelnos 5mo ago
That's not a 100% probability of being harmed, though. That's only if you get caught. Most criminals believe they won't get caught.
369.
by kelnos 5mo ago
Economics is a bad place to look for a fix for social problems. Look at incentives, instead: housed, well-fed people with financial security and a feeling of purpose in life tend to commit fewer crimes, so let's fix wealth/income
370.
by kelnos 5mo ago
It wasn't 2 Claude commits. It's 2 releases where the (many) commits were largely co-authored by Claude. > My statistics courses are far behind me, but don't you need at least 30 data points to conclude anything? That
371.
by kelnos 5mo ago
Some of it was indeed driven by sub-par work from the outsourcing firms, as the style of work was new and people on both sides hadn't developed the right skill set and processes to do the work well. Some of it was genuine cultural diff
372.
by kelnos 5mo ago
> Intent and custom both matter quite a bit in law. Indeed, and I'm not aware of any (Western, at least) legal system that would consider it fraud to not disclose that an LLM had generated some code. I'd like to gently point
373.
by kelnos 5mo ago
That's really all anyone is asking of you. It's odd that this is your position, and yet you seem to be arguing (in your other comments) in a way that seems like you think that you should be able to do whatever you want, with any
374.
by kelnos 5mo ago
Consider the rules around copyright. If your part of it is substantive, then it's your own work. If it isn't, then it isn't. I'm not going to define substantive for you. That's something you should feel obligated
375.
by kelnos 5mo ago
Maybe you should step back and see if there's a reason why there's a stigma, instead of stubbornly insisting that there's nothing different between submitting work that you wrote yourself, vs. work done by an LLM.
376.
by kelnos 5mo ago
That's fine; don't contribute to projects that ask for proper attribution, then, and I suppose everyone will be happy.
377.
by kelnos 5mo ago
Yes, and I respect ghostwritten work less than I do a work with a disclosed true author. Same would be true of unattributed AI-generated code.
378.
by kelnos 5mo ago
You can apply that to the outrage too: the people pissed off about this are going off 2 measly data points.
379.
by kelnos 5mo ago
Uninitialized memory is not a problem (the OS is never going to give a program memory that has data in it from another program). The problem is memory that you allocated in the past, have freed, but hasn't been returned to the OS[0].
380.
by kelnos 5mo ago
Unless you're willing to step up and be that person, it's not your place for you to suggest it.
381.
by kelnos 5mo ago
I'm a little confused at this comment, because the person you're replying to didn't say anything to the effect of what you're arguing against here.
382.
by kelnos 5mo ago
> If you don’t mind me probing a little further, what is the motivation to work on it? Not the person you're replying to, but I do it because it's fun. Programming is a passion of mine, and has been a part of my life since m
383.
by kelnos 5mo ago
First off: I don't agree that there's a social contract here at all. That's just some imaginary thing that you (and others) have decided exists. It's funny how lots of people who aren't open source maintainers s
384.
by kelnos 5mo ago
> can you explain why there is no responsibility whatsoever on the part of a maintainer towards the users? Because I don't. It's that simple. There is nothing that says I have a responsibility, and the license I release und
385.
by kelnos 5mo ago
> I can go on YouTube and get step-by-step instructions on how to safely wire an entire house. Sure, and I'd be comfortable doing that with my house. I wouldn't be comfortable with some random person off the street coming up
386.
by kelnos 5mo ago
They're not sacrificing anything, though. They're just deleting their users' code without their consent. That's not honorable or noble.
387.
by kelnos 5mo ago
I know people who insist that the seasons start on the first of March/June/September/December. It makes no sense from the perspective of the Earth's orientation toward the sun (astronomical seasons), but apparently &quo
388.
by kelnos 5mo ago
I assume an imaginary but very real and typical climate change denier.
389.
by kelnos 5mo ago
Sure, but there's nothing in the name "ESP-IDF" that inherently means it can only support ESP32 devices. It could also support a new theoretical ESP33 device. (I don't have an issue with Espressif's ESP32-* naming
390.
by kelnos 5mo ago
The wifi bits are closed-source blobs. The rust embedded community has reverse-engineered some of it for some chips, but not sure how complete that work is.

More ›