Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
keldaris
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
21 ms
·
151.
▲
by
keldaris
7y ago
The three workers wading through water to open the sluice gates did indeed happen, but it's worth noting that all of them survived just fine and at least two were still alive as recently as a few years ago. I agree, though, I love how
152.
▲
by
keldaris
7y ago
It varies. The physics part is oversimplified and, at times, overdramatized (the threat of a megaton-range explosion being a particularly egregious example). The range of characters is highly limited by the format of the series (hence the f
153.
▲
by
keldaris
7y ago
Thank you, I didn't know about this! Currently still on 5.0 for most of my machines, but this will be helpful once I move to 5.2+.
154.
▲
by
keldaris
7y ago
> That's like saying: "nobody was drowned that we know of, whereas there was a significant cost to building the dam that everyone paid". (And also not dissimilar to arguments about doing no major industry/lifestyle ch
155.
▲
by
keldaris
7y ago
> Considering we are referring to attacks that can bypass your PC's security, "prudence" is a better word than hysteria. That statement can be made about any vulnerability whatsoever. The merit of any mitigation can only b
156.
▲
by
keldaris
7y ago
> It is showing low-level architecture details that would be 100% identical between the two cases. To be as charitable as I can possibly be, the only part that could theoretically make sense is that the compiler could emit non-temporal s
157.
▲
by
keldaris
7y ago
The volatile keyword will certainly lead to implications for cache coherency, but it cannot bypass the TLB or somehow magically avoid the need to involve the memory controller. Unless I'm grossly misunderstanding something, a majority
158.
▲
by
keldaris
7y ago
I don't understand these slides. The volatile keyword does not magically bypass the mechanism by which modern CPUs write to main memory. Am I missing something, or are they somehow meant to be ironic?
159.
▲
by
keldaris
7y ago
The conversation was about the (nominally technical as well as more mainstream) press, not the experts. My remark regarding "wild hysteria" was made in that context. Experts and competent users will do the same thing they always d
160.
▲
by
keldaris
7y ago
He isn't so much making an argument as stating a simple and fairly trivial observation. It's rather sad that hysterical alarmism has grown to such proportions as to even necessitate such observations. My only objection to his thes
161.
▲
by
keldaris
7y ago
I'm glad the PC enthusiast space hasn't succumbed to the wild hysteria caused elsewhere by the side channel issues. It's tiresome to see every new variation people come up with reported as a new apocalypse all over again. Hal
162.
▲
by
keldaris
7y ago
> I didn't check what finite difference stencil or finite volume scheme the code uses, though I presume it's a lower order accurate one that probably has a fair amount of numerical viscosity. It's just the basic second ord
163.
▲
by
keldaris
7y ago
Sure. It's a correct implementation of the projection method [1] for solving the 2D incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, so it is in fact using genuine physics. In terms of physical accuracy, there are some caveats - it's using
164.
▲
by
keldaris
7y ago
Because of everything you've outlined in your last paragraph and more, I don't know many competent C++ programmers who would call std::string or std::map "zero cost abstractions" with a straight face. That term is more c
165.
▲
by
keldaris
7y ago
Taking into account close calls is a fine idea, but they have to weighed by not merely how close to disaster they actually came but also by the magnitude of the potential consequences. Very few (but not zero, granted) of the known close cal
166.
▲
by
keldaris
7y ago
"Safe" is a relative term. Chernobyl is the worst disaster in nuclear history by a huge margin and killed between 200 (the uncontroversial short term deaths) and 4000 (according to the most pessimistic cancer attribution methodolo
167.
▲
by
keldaris
7y ago
> Fuck proprietary drivers though, and fuck Nvidia. I'd normally agree, but it's far easier for me to pick and choose software than hardware, and Nvidia makes the best GPUs by a huge margin (particularly if you care about power
168.
▲
by
keldaris
7y ago
Last time (which was when Fedora first shipped it by default) I looked at Wayland, it took me less than an hour to run into several showstopper issues and move right back. The ones I remember include being incompatible with the proprietary
169.
▲
by
keldaris
7y ago
Why do you equate comedy production with obnoxious shouting in public? It doesn't even make sense as a strawman. I don't produce comedies because I'm not a filmmaker. I don't shout random insulting things in public becau
170.
▲
by
keldaris
8y ago
I'm not sure what it is that you're arguing against, where did I advocate shouting abuse outside a school as a productive way of doing anything? Perhaps you could clarify your argument somewhat. Civil debates are great, I'm h
171.
▲
by
keldaris
8y ago
> I don’t know you or your values, often racists disguise their views as some form of freedom and conflate concepts. I have no strong urge to watch comedies poking fun at other people’s sensitive topics perhaps you should consider why yo
172.
▲
by
keldaris
8y ago
Would you happen to know if recent versions of icc still generate horrible code for AMD CPUs (particularly Ryzen/EPYC)?
173.
▲
by
keldaris
8y ago
Why does the no heap requirement preclude C++? Obviously, you couldn't use much of the STL (not really a loss in constrained environments), but I don't see a reason to write off the language itself?
174.
▲
by
keldaris
8y ago
> I'm pretty convinced most stress caused by driving is just people driving way too aggressively. In my experience, the exact opposite seems to be the case. Aggressive drivers tend to move with a purpose, pay attention and react log
175.
▲
by
keldaris
8y ago
I'm someone who didn't have a traditionally dysfunctional home life and wasn't driven enough to be labelled a "prodigy", but I was good enough at chess, piano and math as a child to meet plenty of prodigies at those
176.
▲
by
keldaris
8y ago
Only knowing the undergrad version of those topics would not count as knowing them "well" by any reasonable metric.
177.
▲
by
keldaris
8y ago
Fat is certainly a better option in general, but I'm already eating plenty of it - or at least as much as I can reasonably get without dairy. As for sugar, I pretty much only get it from what little fruit I consume, eggs, nuts and a ti
178.
▲
by
keldaris
8y ago
I'm in exactly the same boat, I can't stand any sweetened drinks including basic fruit juices or tea/coffee with any sugar at all. I actually find it regrettable, since I'm chronically underweight and getting enough calo
179.
▲
by
keldaris
8y ago
Well, there are two at least partly orthogonal points here - the teleological discussion over what computer programming actually is and the practical point regarding which mindset is more likely to lead to better software. I don't know
180.
▲
by
keldaris
8y ago
That's exactly right, thank you. It's a fundamentally simple point often made by embedded and game programmers (perhaps most famously in recent years in Mike Acton's keynote at CppCon [1]), but most programmers seem to have c
More ›