Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
keeda
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
121.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
So my MS research focused on P2P networks, and with the caveat that the area has been out of favor (and hence under-researched) for about 2 decades, I would say it would be extremely hard to build even decent quality search in a purely dece
122.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
One of my predictions for software in the AI age is that we will end up with nano-services. The thinking is this: 1. LLMs perform best with tight, focused context. 2. Encapsulating specific well-defined functionality into a single service,
123.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
But my point it is not an unjust application of the law, the law is specifically structured to treat certain behaviors as worse than others. IMO that is actually fair in theory : We do NOT want to punish people who casually pirate stuff
124.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
Hmm, not familiar with what's happening in Germany or its copyright laws, but I do recall coming across this piece of news, where OpenAI was indeed found guilty of infringement, so I don't think Big Tech is being treated different
125.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
> Not true. Copyright infringement is a civil infraction, but can escalate to a criminal infraction at high enough scale, but that's a judgment call. I don't think it's a judgment call, the level to escalate seems to be
126.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
A key aspect folks should understand about US Copyright Law is that it much more severely penalizes infringement with distributing, or an intent to distribute, unauthorized copies than to just consume privately. Distributing unauthorized
127.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
Un-login walled: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/we-stopped-counting-tokens-lu...
128.
▲
We Stopped Counting Tokens
(medium.com)
2 points
by
keeda
2mo ago
|
1 comments
129.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
Oh for sure, if your physical activity is higher you need to eat commensurately more! What I meant is, for most of us with desk jobs and little physical activity, our bodies need surprisingly little food and this is what fasting reveals. Li
130.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
Awww, I was hoping GP would respond before they realized who they were responding to, could have been a classic exchange in the vein of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35079
131.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
Wellllll, kind of... I've realized hunger is often just another habit because we're used to eating N meals a day, like the GP comment implies. I've done a quasi OMAD (1-meal a day) thing on-and-off for 3+ years now and don&#x
132.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
It might be due to a combination of a few things: 1. The compounding acceleration of tech has numbed us to the marvels that are happening around us. 2. Big Tech, and Capitalism in general, has been getting more and more extractive than inno
133.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
Same reason why the top ad on Google when you search for a brand is for the brand itself -- "brand bidding" is a thing, and if you don't bid on ads for your own brand, a competitor will. If Google can do it why not Amazon! I
134.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
Kind of yeah, but I think more than just the deluge of material it is the nature of that material: even before AI slop, social media has inundated us with short-form content via their algorithmic firehose. Our attention span is dwindling be
135.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
On the contrary, only when we're an immortal, intergalactic species that has mastered the deepest, darkest secrets of the universe, there might be nothing left for us to do and you could make this complaint. Until then the number of
136.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
> None of that sounds really desirable to me. I read that as "death of the anonymous internet", Meta's loss (to the cheers of everyone) is ushering in ubiquitous age verification. This is an interesting point, that Meta&
137.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
I dunno, not a huge fan of TL;DR (even though it definitely has its place for long-winded walls of text) -- I feel like TL;DR is a cause or a symptom or both of our dwindling attention spans. I think this inability to read anything longer t
138.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
I did some napkin math in a comment a little while ago, that if the whole shebang comes to a screeching hard stop where all these investments are written down to 0 and all AI revenue disappears completely, these trillions of debt could be r
139.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
While TFA itself makes sense I disagree with the title and the conclusion. I would not consider referencing working memory during thinking as “remembering” but as a part of thinking itself. Working memory is the RAM to the much larger but h
140.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
Sure feels like it in my corner of the Bay Area, since we had a prolonged earthquake swarm earlier this year, even hitting a record number of earthquakes per day or something like that.
141.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
Actually, I would say trust is an intrinsic part of an engineer's job, because the job is to deliver something that can be trusted to do what it says on the tin. For software engineering, you're perfectly right that reading the
142.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
Feel free to correct the Wikipedia entry (which does not say anything about it being his last contribution though): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DONKEY.BAS And you may also want to correct this one about the Pancake S
143.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
I feel like this is a common format for social sciences or economics papers, e.g. most of the papers I've seen on ssrn.com have a similar structure. To be sure, I always did find those a bit hard to read (they seem to never have evolve
144.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
Coincidentally just last week a relative recounted a conversation with someone who used to be a student counselor (or psychiatrist?) at MIT who said MIT should be even softer on students. WTF, right? The dynamic, the counselor explained, is
145.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
Boris is talking about Anthropic models only of course. In the chart in his tweet Luna has like a 43% chance of being compromised with sufficient attempts. But even the Anthropic models have as high as a 5% chance, which is still far too mu
146.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
I haven't touched Go in over a decade (since before generics!) but I can see why this would be true. My theory is that LLMs absolutely love very tight, focused context. Go inherently restricts how many abstractions you can stuff into y
147.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
Ehh, I don't think Elon is a big fan of ethics. Especially in AI -- https://www.wired.com/story/twitter-ethical-ai-team/ -- which in retrospect, portended whatever's been happening with Grok.
148.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
In the wake of a security incident, the executive that is typically scapegoated is the CISO. However, with all things AI, this is a very weird situation because CISOs are let go when an organization is breached by external attackers; in thi
149.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
> https://finance.yahoo.com/news/microsoft-ceo-says-overbuild-... Oh I think I recall this. However Satya said that more a year and a half ago, eons in AI time, and maybe he even believed it at the time. But sinc
150.
▲
by
keeda
2mo ago
WTF! I just looked at the filing date of March 2026 and assumed this was still an application! I realize now that even for a patent application it had published too early, since they usually get published 18 months after filing. Turns out i
More ›