keane

10 ms·

121.
by keane 2y ago
Anglo-Irish, born in County Kilkenny, Ireland.
122.
by keane 2y ago
#FireMappers 3.1 is found here: https://www.arcgis.com/apps/instant/media/index.html?appid=a...
123.
by keane 2y ago
You might enjoy the book Quintessence : The Quality of Having It by Betty Cornfeld and Owen Edwards. It was recommended by Jerry Seinfeld in his GQ 10 Things interview. https://archive.org/details/quintessence00bett
124.
by keane 2y ago
This feels like the real story. Why are European headlights deemed unacceptable in the US?
125.
by keane 2y ago
I echo your suggestion. Anyone can learn CPR online for free (no in-person session though) through the Disque Foundation (I'm not affiliated): https://disquefoundation.org/cpr-first-aid-aed-certification...
126.
by keane 2y ago
Wow, had no idea. $150 / ships in February. I hate that I might grab it at that price. https://aeropress.com/products/aeropress-coffee-maker-premiu...
127.
by keane 2y ago
The Lansing book is at https://bookshop.org/p/books/endurance/7205642 or https://tertulia.com/book/9780465062881 or https://www.abebooks.com/servlet/SearchResults?an
128.
by keane 2y ago
A science-minded dentist, Ellie Phillips DDS goes in-depth describing some of these routines on her website [0]. On her blog [1] she includes links to the published studies she is drawing best practices from. [0] https://drellie.
129.
by keane 2y ago
I hope at least one of the five cylinders finds its way to the Cylinder Audio Archive: https://cylinders.library.ucsb.edu
130.
by keane 2y ago
On this issue, there's been a lot of discussion along the lines of "the trademark for an open-source project should work the way I prefer which is…" or "if I was in a decision making position I would simply…" or &qu
131.
by keane 2y ago
>>>Your allowed nominative use and/or a software license does not give you *a license* to title your own services with their trademarks. >>Citation? >[academic paper by two lawyers in this space warning exactly that
132.
Passport Without a Visa: Open-Source Software Licensing and Trademarks(jolts.world)
2 points by keane 2y ago|1 comments
133.
by keane 2y ago
Again, take a look at the wording from Red Hat for comparison: https://www.redhat.com/en/about/trademark-guidelines-and-pol... https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Trademark_guidelines#Tr...
134.
Debian–Mozilla Trademark Dispute(en.wikipedia.org)
2 points by keane 2y ago|0 comments
135.
by keane 2y ago
Sure, you can use Disney, Microsoft, Volkswagen, and WordPress marks referentially. You cannot name products or services “Essential Disney”, “Enterprise Outlook”, “The Volkswagen Experiance”, or “Enterprise WordPress”. Your allowed nominati
136.
by keane 2y ago
You absolutely do have a right to use and sell GPL software. But you might be conflating your rights to the software with your rights to specific trademarked terms. Consider the wording that Red Hat includes in their trademark policy: “Noth
137.
by keane 2y ago
I know what you mean but if CNET Downloads advertised themselves as “The Most Trusted Source for Firefox” The Mozilla Foundation/Corporation would not allow this. A consumer new to the term WordPress might be given the impression that
138.
by keane 2y ago
The trademark policy sounds like it falls somewhere between the Mozilla Foundation/Corporation model and the Red Hat/Fedora Project model. This is how open source in practice works.
139.
by keane 2y ago
>Correction Aware of the fork, “creates” still applies. >It was just what you did. Contemporary projects at the time were Movable Type and Blogger, both proprietary. You didn’t have to contribute to open source: it was a philosophy.
140.
by keane 2y ago
I’m imagining they weren’t calling themselves "The most trusted WordPress platform" and "The Most Trusted WordPress Tech Company" 13 years ago. 'Trusted' can be read with the meaning 'seen as trustworthy&#
141.
by keane 2y ago
I’m not sure that data point constitutes evidence that anyone was opposed to commercial uses of the mark that avoided creating confusion around the mark and the project.
142.
by keane 2y ago
I think you may be mistaken. My understanding is that while courts encourage trademark owners to pursue timely enforcement, the Lanham Act does not mention a time limit. Maybe their use of the marks has changed over the years? A court will
143.
by keane 2y ago
Are you unfamiliar with other open-source project’s trademark protections? From Red Hat’s: “Nothing in these Guidelines is meant to limit your rights under the terms of a free and open source software license. Trademarks and copyright are d
144.
by keane 2y ago
I don’t think it’s a wild change. Explicitly enumerated or not, one might assume that any open-source trademark owner does not allow use of their trademark that implies connection to, or authority over, the root project or that “creates con
145.
by keane 2y ago
>Matt is saying that the WordPress Foundation (non profit) gives Automattic an exclusive commercial license to use the trademark. Automattic originally registered the trademark. They donated it to the Foundation and retained the excl
146.
by keane 2y ago
Correct me if I have the timeline wrong but is my assessment correct that this played out roughly: 1) Matt creates WordPress under GPL, his friend coins the software’s name, Matt creates a company to offer commercial services of it, and reg
147.
by keane 2y ago
>Where is the invention? “it would be nice to have the flexibility of Movable Type, the parsing of Textpattern, the hackability of b2, and the ease of setup of Blogger. Someday, right?” Synthesis is a type of invention: https:/&#x2
148.
Red Hat Trademark Guidelines (from Model Trademark Guidelines)(redhat.com)
1 points by keane 2y ago|0 comments
149.
by keane 2y ago
Take a look at Red Hat's guidelines, based on the open-source Model Trademark Guidelines (CC-BY-4.0), for comparison. They advise they consider it acceptable for you to claim "[Your brand] software is built from modified source co
150.
by keane 2y ago
Matt gave away the software he invented and founded a commercial venture to monetize his efforts despite this. Automattic originally registered the trademarks. Years later they donated them to the foundation, to make the marks available for

More ›