Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ke88y
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
Not sure why something that happened when they were 8 years old means that current undergrads aren't allowed to have fun, buy okay.
32.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
Yes [1]. They also provide tuition scholarships for children of staff and graduate students [2] who could not otherwise afford childcare in the Boston area (which runs on average $20K/yr against a post-tax stipend as low as $31K/y
33.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
Sounds generated.
34.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
No, no need to rent. The solution is pretty trivial, and even battle-tested because the problem has already been solved for mortgages (lenders really care whether a piece of property is your primary residence) and for income tax (your prima
35.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
If you are going to do this, it needs to be paired with price controls on rental housing. Otherwise the expense is passed on and becomes a de facto regressive tax on (usually poor) renters. With respect to short term rentals in particular,
36.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
You'd be taking the owner to court, who probably isn't the one delivering the papers.
37.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
> Mmmm… Assuming you’re referring to US high school, I’m going to say that GPT-4 is more useful than a high school graduate. Useful for what? LLMs are largely useless for the vast majority of labor that people with HS degrees tend to
38.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
> Is it actually illegal but such small stakes that nobody ever gets the proper authorities involved? In the USA: Basically yes, but with various incantations required depending on the state to make it illegal. The "too small stak
39.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
The article specifically states that UPS delivered without contacting her and when she wasn't home, and then sent her the bill.
40.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
Same. I sometimes wonder if in these cases it's a cultural/not-intended-audience thing (USA brain vs CAD brain top-1 expansion of B.C.), or objectively bad writing, or intentional.
41.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
No. But also, it's a terrible analogy because a punch to the face is potentially lethal force but delivering a newspaper isn't. Which, obviously, matters. Spraying someone with a hose in this situation is battery. Unless the newsp
42.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
> Sue the paper company? Yes. > For what damages? Your time. It has value. > What court would waste 8 minutes on something like that? Small claims. This sort of thing is what it's there for. Don't get me wrong: the
43.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
> enjoy the stuf This is abandoned property. In some states you can charge storage fees for abandoned property.
44.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
Unlikely. The packages are being sent to her because the fraudster sellers don't want to bother with them. The value of the shoes is likely not worth her time (else it would've been worth the seller's time -- the margins here
45.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
Which would obviously be a load of Reddit-quality IANAL bullshit… yeah? I mean, really, you cannot lie about who authored books you’re selling. Especially if the author is well known and their reputation has value. https://news.
46.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
> Of course the actual entity posting the fraudulent books are probably overseas somewhere Amazon is an international, but is certainly bound by the laws of the United States of America. At least the ones it can't buy itself out o
47.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
The problem is that the alternative isn’t working either. Americas infrastructure trajectory is highly unsustainable even without decimating the gas tax. Eventually something gives. Lately it’s been bridges.
48.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
I think you missed the tongue-in-cheek tone of my comment, and the last paragraph.
49.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
Trail running shoes are patagucci. Wearing trail running shoes for a strenuous hike -- without first building up a lot of ankle strength -- is a good way to get injured.
50.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
Door-to-door missionaries and college endowment call centers are the scum of the earth that intentionally prey on old folks looking for meaning and/or legacy. But I have yet to see dedicated police forces.
51.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
Or as a laborer. (See: literally any thread about RTO, or grad school, or starup culture vs corporate culture, and so on.)
52.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
In case it wasn't obvious: the examples are firmly tounge-in-cheek. The point is simply that markets are designed for maximizing incentives, and "ESG" as commonly defined isn't -- at least definitionally -- aligned with
53.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
The two are totally orthogonal. Passive refers to fund management style, and passive management can certainly be based on inputs that require human judgement or decision making. Eg, the components of the S&P 500 are selected by committe
54.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
> It makes no sense why such ephemeral concepts should somehow lead to better investments. Each component alone makes sense, if interpreted in a way that is consistent with shareholder capitalism. 1. Environmental. Interpreted in terms
55.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
Again, this is such a weird game to play with words. I'm not sure what else to say.
56.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
> but it significantly degrades capabilities On a train/test/eval split. But the degradation is lower on OOD data. Which suggests perhaps the degradation is merely "less overfitting".
57.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
I’ve noticed a trend on commenters making these sorts of demands. I can’t tell if it’s a new (particularly dumb) rhetorical ploy or if they’re just looking for free labor.
58.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
ML is a sub field of CS, in practice. You don’t need a professional license to do math. Lots of computer scientists to harder and more interesting mathematics than their peers in the math dept. In that respect at least, the main substantive
59.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
Sadly no citation on hand. Just experience. I’m sure there are plenty of academic papers observing this fact by now?
60.
▲
by
ke88y
3y ago
It’s not that simple; llms can generate garbage out even without similar garbage in the training data. And robustly so. I agree that the “social hazard” aspect of llm objectionable content generation is way overplayed, especially in persona
More ›