kazoomonger

11 ms·

61.
by kazoomonger 5y ago
Again, I'm not outraged. But the people that are outraged certainly aren't saying to themselves "well, because he's Jewish, I will/won't be outraged about what he's saying"
62.
by kazoomonger 5y ago
s/are allowed to/can/ It was an awkward turn of phrase
63.
by kazoomonger 5y ago
This is kind of a non-sequitur. Jewish people are allowed to have weird gender-based opinions and get fired for them too, just like everyone else. I don't really have a strong opinion on the overall actions by Apple, but people being o
64.
by kazoomonger 5y ago
I wouldn't rather have such a car, it's just the benefits from charging at home are such that I'd still accept it.
65.
by kazoomonger 5y ago
This is honestly a rather bizarre take, but also not true. I almost never run out of battery at the end of the day, because I've got 230 miles of range. I plug the car in overnight, and it's fully charged in the morning, but if th
66.
by kazoomonger 5y ago
The Leaf doesn't have active cooling. From what I understand, charging up to 80% instead of full except on long trips prevents any thermal issues. I've got a 230 mile range, so 80% is not an issue for me for daily driving. I will
67.
by kazoomonger 5y ago
I really just fucking love plugging in at home to charge (and so does my family, and no I'm not just saying that). I don't want "infrastructure". I would take even slower charging if it meant I got to charge at home. As-
68.
by kazoomonger 5y ago
I doubt that. I've got a Leaf that I've had for almost 2 years (i.e. lots of rubber on the road), and I'm not going back. Judging by the number of Teslas I see driving on the road every time I'm out, I don't think o
69.
by kazoomonger 5y ago
I think your example doesn't quite work. If one says "the guys/men in X", that can most likely be interpreted as "the people in X", particularly for male-dominated fields/areas. If someone specifies "
70.
by kazoomonger 5y ago
Out of curiosity, I just tested a 100-comment thread on my phone with Firefox. Folding it was instantaneous, unfolding it took ~4 seconds. That makes me wonder what takes so long, given that the initial page load didn't take anywhere n
71.
by kazoomonger 5y ago
This exists locally to me, you might have something similar near you: https://www.freegeektwincities.org/ They've been great for both buying and selling. They take old cables that don't even work any more and recy
72.
by kazoomonger 5y ago
That looks cool, but from what I can tell, not really something I can use. All of the Selenium testing I'm doing is accessed via localhost, often on bare metal. None of it's available via the internet, which it looks like is requi
73.
by kazoomonger 5y ago
It's not just Selenium, it's anything that has to interact with Shadow DOM. If you want to use pure JS to click the button in my above example, you can't just write this: document.querySelector("#foo").click()
74.
by kazoomonger 5y ago
In a theoretical vacuum, maybe. However we've done a fair amount of exploring ourselves and the way we work, and we haven't found a soul yet. Asserting that humans are somehow special requires explaining the lack of any supporting
75.
by kazoomonger 5y ago
I'm currently working on testing a UI with Selenium that uses Shadow DOM all over the place. It's hot garbage, and I have no idea why anybody thought this was a good idea. Something goes wrong in CI and you'd like to dump the
76.
by kazoomonger 5y ago
Not sure what you mean by that. If you're looking for a rigorous mathematical proof that humans obey the same laws of physics as everything else, I can't offer you one. However, the burden of proof is on someone asserting that hum
77.
by kazoomonger 5y ago
> the fact that dominoes and animals and people appear to behave according to different rules The crux of the issue is that you're wrong here. Humans have this vanity that we're special, but we're really not. We behave acc
78.
by kazoomonger 5y ago
That article is... not informative. It says (paraphrasing) "people didn't pay 91% of their income!" and then just defends that by explaining what a marginal tax system is. Explaining what a marginal tax system is doesn't
79.
by kazoomonger 5y ago
My response was more doubting that Go is going to be used many times more than it is currently 10 years down the line, but the trend on Rust is upwards: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=%2Fm%2F0..
80.
by kazoomonger 5y ago
Not sure what you mean. This chart shows the peak as being in 2019, and declining since then: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=g...
81.
by kazoomonger 5y ago
I doubt Go will be used in the future more by several times than it is now. Looking at Google Trends, we're past peak Go, it's now on the decline: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&a
82.
by kazoomonger 6y ago
What would happen if I wanted only some fields to be required? To borrow from the GP example, something like this: struct Person<F> { pub name: F<String>, pub age: Option<u32>, } With `Person&l
83.
by kazoomonger 6y ago
TBH, that article doesn't really make any sense. Saying "because ideology A shares a few attributes with my favorite ideology, it's really just a subset of my ideology" doesn't really make sense. Also, I don't