Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kasabali
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
66 ms
·
871.
▲
by
kasabali
9y ago
Good luck with that considering they're using Samsung panels.
872.
▲
by
kasabali
9y ago
and a fingerprint scanner
873.
▲
Lenovo Reveals New ThinkPad a Series Powered by AMD PRO
(news.lenovo.com)
3 points
by
kasabali
9y ago
|
0 comments
874.
▲
by
kasabali
9y ago
UDF https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Disk_Format
875.
▲
Stop trying to kill the headphone jack
(thenextweb.com)
77 points
by
kasabali
9y ago
|
115 comments
876.
▲
by
kasabali
9y ago
In Google Analytics issue last month, "legacy" uBlock could block the connection while webextension version couldn't. It can't because it is not allowed to (openness), as a result your privacy is compromised.
877.
▲
Rebuild of Debian using Clang 3.9, 4.0 and 5.0
(sylvestre.ledru.info)
1 points
by
kasabali
9y ago
|
0 comments
878.
▲
by
kasabali
9y ago
Comment threads are a useful way of organizing the discussion, why did you choose to not use it?
879.
▲
by
kasabali
9y ago
> What everybody want's right now is a faster browser. That's the main requested feature. That what's everyone agree on. Talk for yourself, not on everyone's behalf > I've been using Firefox for so long it was
880.
▲
by
kasabali
9y ago
I know that, thanks. I posted it as a real life example of where webextensions are still not as powerful as the so called legacy extensions and wonder if that specific case still applies, is it fixed, planning to be fixed, or are there othe
881.
▲
by
kasabali
9y ago
uBlock Origin on Firefox would be more powerful than uBlock Origin on Chrome, but does it mean that uBlock Origin webextension on Firefox will be as powerful as uBlock Origin "legacy" Firefox extension ? This is a post of gorhill
882.
▲
by
kasabali
9y ago
xfce display switching is horribly unpolished. attach a monitor that is already set as secondary and watch all windows move to the new display.
883.
▲
For software that is cross platform and accessible, forget about Qt
(blind.guru)
147 points
by
kasabali
9y ago
|
79 comments
884.
▲
by
kasabali
9y ago
it is possible today using tab groups and tab groups helper extensions. tab groups provides tab groups and the helper provides suspend/resume of individual groups. sadly they will stop functioning after Firefox 57, because progress, y
885.
▲
by
kasabali
9y ago
Pocket had a great integration with Firefox when it was an extension. Then they decided to integrate it into the browser and ironically it end up being a piece of shit that was not more functional than a bookmarklet. Not only that but they
886.
▲
by
kasabali
9y ago
iirc trash in Windows has a quota so it should trim eventually
887.
▲
by
kasabali
9y ago
Python is not part of the base system (at least it is not installed nor required in minbase debootstrap profile and apt recommends is disabled). I wholeheartedly agree with removing Perl. Also a lot of other questionable packages in the ess
888.
▲
by
kasabali
9y ago
It is not Debian's fault that Google prioritizes ad ridden mailing list mirror links over the neat & clean bugs.debian.org pages.
889.
▲
by
kasabali
9y ago
What is the point of being "transactional" if it can't even handle the most trivial failure scenario resiliently? https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fe...
890.
▲
by
kasabali
9y ago
Send a mail to the contact link in wiki, I'm sure they'll help.
891.
▲
by
kasabali
9y ago
Check http://debdelta.debian.net
892.
▲
by
kasabali
9y ago
Try aptly or debmirror.
893.
▲
by
kasabali
9y ago
This myth about irregular Debian releases need to die. Debian releases every 2 years (give or take few months): Debian 3.1 Sarge (June 2005) Debian 4.0 Etch (April 2007) Debian 5.0 Lenny (February 2009) Debian 6.0 Squeeze (February 2011) De
894.
▲
by
kasabali
9y ago
> This would be super duper when trying to install a standalone package file on a system where the deps aren't already present You mean like "apt install <deb package>"?
895.
▲
by
kasabali
9y ago
I don't think FPGA's count in this context but I did a quick search on Intel fabs and it looks like I'm wrong anyway: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2016/08/intel-will-allow-arm...
896.
▲
by
kasabali
9y ago
Even M4 macros may work. It would be still more in the shell spirit than ruby gems.
897.
▲
by
kasabali
9y ago
Dynamic binary translation is not exactly a huge tech thing.
898.
▲
by
kasabali
9y ago
Intel doesnt let anyone else use their fabs.
899.
▲
by
kasabali
9y ago
Coincidentally both myths originate from the FreeNAS forum.
900.
▲
by
kasabali
9y ago
It's not that they change kernel versions every month to the most recent ones anyway. It's roughly every year and if you check you'll see they're all upstream longterm versions which are supported 2-5 years. A device is
More ›