Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kartoffelsaft
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
31 ms
·
31.
▲
by
kartoffelsaft
1y ago
Not knowing the exact language used by the C standard, I suspect the reason GCC doesn't cause these issues with most programs is that the wording of "array object" refers specifically to arrays with compile-time-known sizes,
32.
▲
by
kartoffelsaft
1y ago
If there are rooms in your house someone else could lock you out of, do you own the house or do they? If someone else could use your car without your permission, do you own the car or do they? If someone could grow their own plants in you b
33.
▲
by
kartoffelsaft
1y ago
I'm sure you can find people making arguments about a lack of quality from machines about textiles, woodworking, cinematography, etc., but digging holes? If you have a source of someone complaining about hole quality I'll be fasci
34.
▲
by
kartoffelsaft
1y ago
Curious what makes you say it'd be less legally dubious than an emulator? To me, it seems this would be at the same legality as the NES emulator because you're basically 'emulating' the environment Roblox game code runs
35.
▲
by
kartoffelsaft
1y ago
I don't think what we have now fits that definition. LLMs are still narrowly good at language generation, and the "many" things it's good at are things that have canonical textual / linguistic representations (code,
36.
▲
by
kartoffelsaft
1y ago
Reminds me of a discussion that Casey Muratori and Robert Martin had over clean code and it's impact on performance... but not because of the subject matter. They were using GitHub as a medium for their discussion, and they ran into so
37.
▲
by
kartoffelsaft
1y ago
It had been written by (at the latest) September 2008: https://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2008/09/best-gmail-error-m...
38.
▲
by
kartoffelsaft
1y ago
I am well below that age and I don't know my MBTI letters.
39.
▲
by
kartoffelsaft
1y ago
The way it is written is to say that this is an important interview question for any software engineering position, and I'm guessing you agree by the way you say it's critical. But by the same logic, should we be asking for the
40.
▲
by
kartoffelsaft
1y ago
It "must" be done in the sense that `dyn Error`, anyhow, and (if we include zig's equivalent) inferred error sets mean something different than setting up an error enum. Using an error enum makes the failures explicit, which
41.
▲
by
kartoffelsaft
1y ago
Honestly, with a lot of HN debating the merits of LLMs for generating code, I wish it were an unwritten rule that everyone states the stack they're using with it. It seems that the people who rave about it creating a whole product line
42.
▲
by
kartoffelsaft
1y ago
This seems written to sound like a profound piece of wisdom, but I find it difficult to not interperet it as a very flowery way of saying "git gud." If that is indeed what you mean then that is fine, but it is still worth acknowle
43.
▲
by
kartoffelsaft
2y ago
The argument is not that this theoretical 3rd party would be a for-profit company, but that there's already existing for-profit companies that exist and could serve that purpose, and that the new 3rd party wouldn't see much use
44.
▲
by
kartoffelsaft
2y ago
Sure, people make mistakes all the time. But would you prefer those mistakes be sprinkled randomly throughout your data crunching, or be systematic errors? The point that that post is making is that a machine isn't going to make a mist
45.
▲
by
kartoffelsaft
2y ago
It really feels as though Amazon's greatest fear is the idea that you might search for something and get no results. If we show you BS you explicitly said you aren't looking for then we're giving up the opportunity of trickin
46.
▲
by
kartoffelsaft
2y ago
I believe a restriction for `constexpr`/`consteval` is that you can do memory allocations but they must all be freed at the end of the evaluation. Arbitrary precision means arbitrary memory usage means allocation that's the runtim
47.
▲
by
kartoffelsaft
2y ago
For whatever reason, Ravenholm didn't particularly unsettle me. I don't know what it is, maybe expectation from the praise it receives left me underwhelmed, or maybe it's the fact that I was quite literally a toddler when the
48.
▲
by
kartoffelsaft
2y ago
There are a few things that come to mind that make this different: 1. This isn't really privacy breaching. For someone who taps the "share to youtube" button without knowing what it means, sure, but even that is pretty explic
49.
▲
by
kartoffelsaft
2y ago
Trump has stated that his biggest regret from his term is that the people he appointed to various positions, while quite competent and/or experienced, would push back on ideas or plans he proposed. In other words, they weren't loy
50.
▲
by
kartoffelsaft
2y ago
Honestly sounds like that's Conway's law, but in reverse. Instead of a project's setup mirroring it's organization, the organization mirrors what they see as the ideal project setup. That's something that I wish mor