Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
karlmdavis
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
61.
▲
by
karlmdavis
10y ago
> The feds forbid LE. Nope! Very much allowed -- at least for almost all applications. Here's just one example from a quick Google search that turned up lots of others: https://www.digitalgov.gov/2016/09/07
62.
▲
by
karlmdavis
10y ago
I used to have this problem a TON, and it drove me absolutely batty. One thing I've found that's drastically cut down on the frequency (possibly eliminated it? not sure) is this: Always wait ten seconds between display state chang
63.
▲
by
karlmdavis
10y ago
Of course that's okay with most folks. Reality is messy, and large swaths of it are unamenable to formalization in laws; human discretion will always be required. Now, we can argue about where the balance is best struck, whether it
64.
▲
by
karlmdavis
10y ago
It would also be nice to break down remote by allowed timezones, which many job postings specify.
65.
▲
by
karlmdavis
10y ago
The coding equivalent of accident rubbernecking.
66.
▲
by
karlmdavis
10y ago
This is perhaps a bit off-topic, but what I really wish more data processing/ETL tools supported is the concept of transactional units. Too many of them seem to start with the worldview that "we need to shove in as many of the sep
67.
▲
by
karlmdavis
10y ago
Probably don't want the default refresh of 2 seconds. And the title/header is probably redundant, as well. Maybe this, instead? $ watch --interval 0.1 --no-title date ;)
68.
▲
by
karlmdavis
10y ago
FWIW, if you fight through the "undocumented features," Jenkins actually ends up being one of the best tools out there to manage via Ansible or whatnot. The Groovy/Java API for Jenkins is incredibly powerful, and by adding Gr
69.
▲
by
karlmdavis
10y ago
Because of the power differential? In the same way that it's different for a short man dealing with harassment from a tall man, or an average man dealing with harassment from a gymbro.
70.
▲
by
karlmdavis
10y ago
Why on earth would Google care enough right now about MS' phone efforts for that to be something they're actively seeking? I think it's far more likely that any movement towards C# on Android would be motivated by: 1) perhaps
71.
▲
by
karlmdavis
10y ago
Or if, 4, you live/operate in the US, and are thus bound by their laws.
72.
▲
by
karlmdavis
10y ago
Ding ding! Hard things are hard. It seems... at least a bit arrogant for a developer that doesn't write any of the languages that rely on these features to claim that they're insane and excessive.
73.
▲
by
karlmdavis
10y ago
I do. I mean... seems pretty hypocritical for a coder who's made most of their income from software NOT to.
74.
▲
by
karlmdavis
10y ago
Here's half an answer: Kerberos. Which SSH does support, btw.
75.
▲
by
karlmdavis
10y ago
Also, if you're interested in issues like that, you'd probably really enjoy joining the http://codefordc.org/ community! I've only attended one Meetup, but it was the most ridiculously welcoming and well-run
76.
▲
by
karlmdavis
10y ago
Wow, uh... I'm not in enterprise software right now, but if I were, I'd be asking you where I could send a check. This is fantastic advice. Thanks for sharing it!
77.
▲
by
karlmdavis
11y ago
What evidence do you have that productivity is elastic in that way? I'm particularly curious how "far out" the effect you're describing goes: is it still elastic enough to cover an extra 3 weeks of vacation per year?
78.
▲
by
karlmdavis
11y ago
On Windows, Manic Time does a beautiful job of this active window tracking. I haven't found anything that does it for Linux, though.
79.
▲
by
karlmdavis
11y ago
There's a set of tradeoffs here. 1) You really, really need feedback from your users as early as possible, to help keep you on-track. 2) Shipping something truly half-baked can kill your chances with most of those users. The trick is i
80.
▲
by
karlmdavis
11y ago
Is that really where we're at? That an "average Java developer" doesn't understand the classpath or environment? I've certainly worked with a lot of folks who didn't, but I guess I've just always hoped tha
81.
▲
by
karlmdavis
11y ago
The only positive here is that Yahoo! is better than Ask, and maybe--just maybe--it'll just be a change to the default search provider, rather than the installation of yet another lousy toolbar (YALT).
82.
▲
by
karlmdavis
11y ago
I was 50/50 on whether or not he was just trying to defend poor decision-making with this post, up until this line: > It’s worth repeating that what’s generally overlooked is that each decision was made by the team and a variety of
83.
▲
by
karlmdavis
11y ago
I use SonarQube myself and have generally found its rules to make sense after a quick Google, at most. Aside from its code formatting rules, which are just silly. They're easy enough to modify or turn off, though, so there's that.
84.
▲
by
karlmdavis
11y ago
While I intuitively agree with the conclusion there, this analysis definitely doesn't prove it... Of course more time was spent editing files with more lines of code. In fact, if your entire application was all contained in one file, I
85.
▲
by
karlmdavis
11y ago
I don't know this for sure, but I seem to recall that lawyer's professional rules of conduct require them to not leave clients in the lurch, without providing them ample warning to find new counsel. I believe this is what the GP p
86.
▲
by
karlmdavis
11y ago
As someone who regularly uses Git (and prefers it), RTC really isn't all that bad. I'd even go so far as to recommend it for some teams/companies.
87.
▲
by
karlmdavis
12y ago
For me, a combination of these three things has proved to be successful: 1) Every day. I've seen this with working out, side projects, or whatever... I can't stick with commitments if I try for an "every other day" or &q
88.
▲
by
karlmdavis
12y ago
Yeah, I noticed the interface types, which seem like a much better/safer design choice. (Again, though, it's entirely possible this is just my strong-typing prejudices coming out.)
89.
▲
by
karlmdavis
12y ago
Perhaps I'm poisoned by my love of strong static types, but... what would you ever use union types like that for? I'm having trouble imagining scenarios where a "list that might have strings or integers" is a good idea.
90.
▲
by
karlmdavis
12y ago
I can understand why they wouldn't have wanted to create an XSD covering all of the possible keys.
More ›