kalleboo

18 ms·

271.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
I would have agreed if they hadn't put in the engineering effort to upgrade the backup disk image to APFS instead of HFS+. They wouldn't have done that if the plan was to deprecate it soon. (IIRC the next version of macOS is also
272.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
> licensing, probably Correct, Apple has dropped everything that switched to GPLv3 which includes newer versions of bash, samba, etc.
273.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
Even on the old world G3s, Mac OS X never had floppy drive support. There was a driver someone had ported from BSD you could install.
274.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
Are you talking about a different article? The one linked says they only had their NS pointed at CloudFlare and the domains weren't registered there
275.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
> unless you happen to have a 400Mhz PII or some equally overmuscled CPU to drive it Oh no!
276.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
In Sweden people notoriously push the law to the extreme by modifying cars with speed limiters etc to legally count as tractors https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/nov/22/when-is-a-car-... > Will y
277.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
> Also, good webapps are often _better_ than native apps, as they can support tabs All the native apps I use support tabs, its a basic feature of the macOS windowing APIs https://developer.apple.com/documentation/a
278.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
Apple and Microsoft reached their peak usability when they employed teams of people to literally sit and watch what users did in real life (and listen to them narrating what they want to do), take notes, and ask followup questions. Everythi
279.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
> I would be absolutely shocked if they ever one day took content from a non-deterministic black box and presented it directly to the user Aren't the notification summaries just that? When they came out there were lots of examples
280.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
Existing units could be sold after the deadline. Basically, what was left on store shelves. Existing models were not grandfathered in. Apple stopped selling the iPhone 14/SE the day before the rule went into effect for this reason
281.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
> Apple wasn't required to use USB-C up until the iPhone 17 release in September 2025 No, starting December 28, 2024 they could no longer import and sell iPhones with Lightning ports, so they had to at the very least make the iPho
282.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
> You can see that in that it's very popular for export It's very popular for export since the US has been forcing their allies to buy them over any alternatives, this was shown in the WikiLeaks cables.
283.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
> As executive chairman, Cook will assist with certain aspects of the company, including engaging with policymakers around the world. It sounds like Cook will continue to get the dirty work of pleasing world leaders while Ternus can fo
284.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
> iPhone 15 released September 22, 2023 > EU’s Common Charger Directive went into effect on December 28, 2024 Years?
285.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
AppleCare covers the 80% capacity/1000 cycles rating, so I always keep an eye on my battery around 1000 cycles praying it will drop under 80% so I can get a new battery for free under AppleCare, and have yet to manage it
286.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
Oh yeah, I had forgotten about the weird "games" exception. At least that means they'll keep parts of Rosetta 2 around in the code, but they could also end up doing some weird whitelisting for the specific games they want to
287.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
I hope they keep around the underpinnings for Rosetta 2 (without the macOS parts) just to keep supporting Intel virtualization for things like Docker. Heck then anyone who really needs to run some old Intel app can run a virtualized older v
288.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
The 50% adoption number is based on Google data which doesn't contain users from China, since Google is blocked there. If you added Chinese users the number would probably be closer to 55%.
289.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
A lot of us don't like this "you will own nothing and you will be happy" kind of energy.
290.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
It uses a tape drive to record observations and radio them back to earth. I find it amazing to imagine a single reel of tape (and the belts in the drive) still being reliable 48 years later...
291.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
Isn't this Japanese Railway Thesis that with the railway you build something in that "very little between"? Have the railway company buy up up all that cheap land, develop it into commute hubs with their own walkable retail a
292.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
I had this issue with my MacBook Pro in the apartment I lived in back in the early 2010's, but never had the issue since, so I always assumed it was some grounding issue.
293.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
> A $10 chinese version wouldn’t work so well You can get $7 MFi licensed versions these days from the dollar store https://kalleboo.com/linked/daiso-airtag.jpg https://www.apple.com/newsroom/
294.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
> That world had massive concerns about the processing cost of NAT The processing cost of NAT is still a problem. There's that classic post by a Native American tribal ISP where it was cheaper for them to pay to replace their clie
295.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
The article mentions that DHCPv6 was an afterthought because DHCP itself barely existed when IPv6 was being designed - they were still using things like RARP or BOOTP! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_Address_Resol
296.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
> if you have ever attempted to use IPv6 you will notice that is significantly slower than IPv4 The link in the OP shows that IPv6 typically gives users 10-20ms lower latency. This confers with my experience since IPv4 is typically g
297.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
On the server side, everyone is moving behind CDNs that support IPv6 by default. On the consumer home internet side, consumer ISPs are slowly one by one lighting up IPv6, and it just works since consumer routers are mostly auto-configure (o
298.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
> v4 was built around the idea of multiple free standing networks linked by gateways It was absolutely not. This is why early companies like Apple and Ford got massive IP allocations - each computer was expected to have a unique IP add
299.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
I'm re-learning this right now since I kind of just set it and forgot it 2 years ago but while my provider typically uses MAP-E it looks like when you use a static IP it switches to using RFC2473 (IPIP6) directly without the extra port
300.
by kalleboo 6mo ago
I'm using en hikari on Flets Cross (10 gigabit) with v6plus. I set it up like 2 years ago but this was in my bookmarks: https://zenn.dev/ebi68k/articles/6df7cfec64c281 edit: looking this all up again to refre

More ›